Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sigma DP2 Quattro Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£560Sensor size:APS-CWeight:489 gBattery life (CIPA):200 shots

Sigma DP2 Quattro Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.1

Overall score

Score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 90% of cameras
4.1

Technical score

Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.2

Sensor & Image

25%

2.5

Photo Features

18%

3.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.2

Display & Design

8%

3.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

▼Worse than 85% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £560

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sigma DP2 Quattro

Technical score
Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.2

Sensor & Image

25%

2.5

Photo Features

18%

3.2

Video & Audio

14%

5.2

Display & Design

8%

3.7

Battery & Power

7%

2.0

Connectivity & Storage

4.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sigma DP2 Quattro has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.1

Overall score

40%

7.6

Price

5.1
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
29 MP
Main camera megapixels
29 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 29 MP, which is higher than that of 91.2% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.33 µm, which are larger than those in 73.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
320 px
Max video resolution
320 px
This camera supports 320 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 91.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
28 Mbps
Video bitrate
28 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 28 Mbps which is lower than that of 51.9% of cameras and equal to that of 8.7% of cameras.
Video bit depth
12 bit
Video bit depth
12 bit
This camera supports video at 12 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 96% of cameras and equal to that of 3.5% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
489 g
Weight
489 g
This camera weighs 489 g which is heavier than 60.3% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
161.4 mm
Width
161.4 mm
This camera has a width of 161.4 mm which is wider than 99.6% of cameras.
Height
67 mm
Height
67 mm
This camera has a height of 67 mm which is shorter than 59.8% of cameras and equal to that of 1.8% of cameras.
Thickness
81.6 mm
Thickness
81.6 mm
This camera has a thickness of 81.6 mm which is thicker than 79.8% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
200 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 200 shots, which is shorter than that of 90.5% of cameras and equal to that of 3.8% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,200 mAh
Battery capacity
1,200 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,200 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 52.4% of cameras and equal to those in 2.5% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    29 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (29 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    29 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Higher video color depth
    Video bit depth
    12 bit
    This camera supports a higher video bit depth than the average camera (12 bit vs 8 bit). The average camera supports video at 8 bit.
    12 bit vs 8 bit
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 1 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    1
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (1 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    29 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (29 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    29 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Higher video color depth
    Video bit depth
    12 bit
    This camera supports a higher video bit depth than the average camera (12 bit vs 8 bit). The average camera supports video at 8 bit.
    12 bit vs 8 bit
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    320 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (320 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    320 px vs 1920 px
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 2.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    Lower-resolution mode reaches 4.5 fps.
    3.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 20.6% worse value for money
    Sigma DP2 Quattro has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.14 vs 6.2).
    5.14 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Sigma DP2 Quattro is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 93.1% more expensive
    Sigma DP2 Quattro is more expensive than the average camera (£560 vs £290).
    £560 vs £290
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 41.5 mm wider
    Width
    161.4 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (161.4 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    161.4 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 35.6 mm thicker
    Thickness
    81.6 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (81.6 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    81.6 mm vs 46 mm
  • 94 g heavier
    Weight
    489 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (489 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    489 g vs 395 g
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 2.2 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.5 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    Lower-resolution mode reaches 4.5 fps.
    3.5 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    320 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (320 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    320 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 2 Mbps lower video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    28 Mbps
    This camera has a lower video bitrate than the average camera (28 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    28 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • 130 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    200 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (200 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    200 shots vs 330 shots
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
11/07/2014
Summary of the review
S
stevehuffphoto.com
18/08/2014
Summary of the review
L
luminous-landscape.com
01/09/2014
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
M
mirrorlessons.com
08/12/2014
Summary of the review
3
35mmc.com
27/06/2022
Summary of the review
W
wimarys.com
15/08/2014
Summary of the review
P
photoreview.com.au
01/09/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/09/2014
Summary of the review
A
amateurphotographer.com
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
W
whatdigitalcamera.com
01/08/2014
Summary of the review
3
35mmc.com
27/06/2022
Summary of the review
E
ewoodsphoto.com
20/08/2021
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
05/08/2014
Summary of the review
D
dkamera.de
02/10/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
16/07/2014
Summary of the review
K
krolop-gerst.com
05/08/2014
Summary of the review
S
schallundstille.de
12/07/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
07/08/2014
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
N/A
Summary of the review
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
08/07/2014
Summary of the review
E
elconfidencial.com
17/08/2014
Summary of the review
N
naturpixel.com
25/08/2014
Summary of the review
N
nadir.it
No date provided
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
01/12/2014
Summary of the review
C
camerarace.com
No date provided
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
F
fotografie.nl
24/11/2009
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sigma DP2 Quattro

  • Extraordinary image sharpness and pixel-level detail at low ISO settings (100–400)
  • Unique Foveon X3 sensor provides rich, accurate color reproduction and 3D depth
  • Optically superb 30mm f/2.8 fixed lens that is sharp corner-to-corner
  • Improved battery life compared to previous Merrill models (up to ~200 shots)
  • Simple, clean, and highly customizable menu system
  • Excellent build quality with a premium, well-weighted feel
  • Fast manual focus operation with a dedicated ring and helpful 'punch-in' magnification

What we don't like about Sigma DP2 Quattro

  • Poor low-light performance; image quality and dynamic range degrade rapidly above ISO 800
  • Polarizing, elongated body design that is bulky and difficult to fit in standard bags
  • Sigma Photo Pro (SPP) RAW processing software is notoriously slow and difficult to use
  • Proprietary RAW files are largely incompatible with mainstream editors like Lightroom
  • Slow write speeds and buffering times (approx. 5 seconds) after taking a photo
  • Lack of built-in viewfinder (EVF) and no image stabilization
  • Limited autofocus points (only 9) which are restricted to the center of the frame

Verdict

The Sigma DP2 Quattro is a specialized compact camera featuring a unique 29-megapixel APS-C Foveon X3 Quattro CMOS sensor, which utilizes a three-layer design to capture full color information at every pixel, effectively delivering detail comparable to a 39-megapixel Bayer sensor. It is equipped with a high-performance fixed 30mm f/2.8 lens (45mm full-frame equivalent), a TRUE III image processor, and a distinctive elongated body designed for a stable, two-handed grip. Its primary advantages include extraordinary per-pixel sharpness, rich color gradation, and exceptional low-ISO image quality that can rival medium format systems. However, the camera is hampered by poor performance at high ISO settings (typically above ISO 800), slow autofocus and processing speeds, lack of image stabilization or video recording, and a relatively short battery life of approximately 200 shots per charge.

Compare Sigma DP2 Quattro with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sigma DP2 Quattro and other products in the Cameras category

No results found