Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Ricoh GR Digital IV Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£310Sensor size:1/1.7"Weight:219 gBattery life (CIPA):390 shots

Ricoh GR Digital IV Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

5.3

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 54% of cameras
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

5.5

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.6

Display & Design

8%

5.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 51% of cameras
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 113 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 83% of cameras
  • ricoh-gr-digital-iv
ricoh-gr-digital-iv

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Ricoh GR Digital IV

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

4.9

Sensor & Image

25%

5.5

Photo Features

18%

3.7

Video & Audio

14%

6.6

Display & Design

8%

5.9

Battery & Power

7%

2.8

Connectivity & Storage

5.0
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on 113 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Ricoh GR Digital IV has a popularity score of 7.4, which is higher than 70.8% of cameras.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.3

Overall score

40%

8.9

Price

6.4
Sensor size
1/1.7"
Sensor size
1/1.7"
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/1.7"; it is smaller than the sensor in 57.3% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 2.3% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
10 MP
Main camera megapixels
10 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 10 MP, which is lower than that of 97.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
2.04 µm
Main camera pixel size
2.04 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 2.04 µm, which are smaller than those in 57.7% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
640 px
Max video resolution
640 px
This camera supports 640 px video recording which is lower quality than that of 90.6% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
?
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
Motion JPEG
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
219 g
Weight
219 g
This camera weighs 219 g which is lighter than 74.5% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
108.6 mm
Width
108.6 mm
This camera has a width of 108.6 mm which is narrower than 69.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
59.8 mm
Height
59.8 mm
This camera has a height of 59.8 mm which is shorter than 79.8% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Thickness
32.5 mm
Thickness
32.5 mm
This camera has a thickness of 32.5 mm which is thinner than 73.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
390 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
390 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 390 shots, which is longer than that of 65.9% of cameras and equal to that of 0.9% of cameras.
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
Battery capacity
1,250 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 1,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.4% of cameras and equal to those in 3.9% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
Uses 2x AA batteries.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 176 g lighter
    Weight
    219 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (219 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    219 g vs 395 g
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.04 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.04 GB vs 0 GB
  • 60 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    390 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (390 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    390 shots vs 330 shots
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 150 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    180 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (180 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    180 s vs 30 s
  • 176 g lighter
    Weight
    219 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (219 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    219 g vs 395 g
  • 2 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    2
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (2 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • 14.1 mm shorter body
    Height
    59.8 mm
    This camera is shorter than the average camera (59.8 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    59.8 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 13.5 mm thinner
    Thickness
    32.5 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (32.5 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    32.5 mm vs 46 mm
  • 11.3 mm narrower
    Width
    108.6 mm
    This camera is narrower than the average camera (108.6 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    108.6 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 150 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    180 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (180 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    180 s vs 30 s
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 60 shots more shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    390 shots
    This camera has longer battery life than the average camera (390 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    390 shots vs 330 shots
  • 130 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,250 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (1250 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    1,250 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • 0.04 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.04 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.04 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.7"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.7" vs APS-C).
    1/1.7" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    640 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (640 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    640 px vs 1920 px
  • 4.16 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.54 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.54 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 2.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ricoh GR Digital IV
    the average camera
    Ricoh GR Digital IV has a lower user score than the average camera (7.81 vs 8.000).
    7.81 vs 8
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.7"
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.7" vs APS-C).
    1/1.7" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    10 MP
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (10 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    10 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Lower RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    12-bit
    This camera supports lower RAW bit depth than the average camera (12-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    12-bit vs 14-bit
  • 1.3 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    2.04 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (2 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    2.04 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • 2 older
    Release date
    2011
    This camera is older than the average camera (2011 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    October 2011
    2,011 vs 2,013
  • 4.16 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    1.54 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (1.5 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    1.54 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 0.8 stops less CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    3.2 stops
    This camera offers less CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (3.2 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    3.2 stops vs 4 stops
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • Lower video resolution
    Max video resolution
    640 px
    This camera records lower-resolution video than the average camera (640 px vs 1920 px). The average camera records at 1920 px.
    640 px vs 1920 px
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    focus locked at recording start
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    1.3
    This camera uses HDMI 1.3, while the average camera uses HDMI 1.4.
    1.3 vs 1.4

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
whatdigitalcamera.com
27/12/2011
Summary of the review
C
cameraderie.org
27/12/2011
Summary of the review
C
cameraderie.org
29/01/2012
Summary of the review
T
theinspiredeye.net
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
30/12/2011
Summary of the review
D
d-pixx.de
09/11/2011
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
15/03/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
20/05/2012
Summary of the review
C
connect-living.de
01/02/2012
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
09/04/2026
Summary of the review
F
frankwandelt.nl
21/08/2025
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
07/01/2026
Summary of the review
S
shoot.be
14/01/2026
Summary of the review
B
beeldnet.nl
15/01/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 113 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Ricoh GR Digital IV

  • legendary ergonomics and one-handed operation
  • sharp f/1.9 fast lens (28mm equivalent)
  • extremely pocketable and discreet design
  • iconic 'Snap Focus' mode for instant shooting
  • exceptional macro performance (as close as 1cm)
  • effective image stabilization for low light
  • unique film-like CCD color rendering and B&W profiles
  • fast startup time and overall responsiveness

What we don't like about Ricoh GR Digital IV

  • small 1/1.7-inch CCD sensor lacks detail compared to modern APS-C
  • poor low-light performance with high noise above ISO 400-800
  • video recording limited to 640x480 VGA resolution
  • slow RAW file writing speeds
  • lack of weather sealing and prone to sensor dust
  • autofocus struggles in low-contrast scenes
  • no built-in viewfinder

Verdict

The Ricoh GR Digital IV is a premium enthusiast compact featuring a 10-megapixel 1/1.7-inch CCD sensor paired with a fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 fixed prime lens. This model introduced a hybrid autofocus system for significantly faster focus speeds and a high-resolution 3.0-inch 1.23 million-dot LCD screen with a white sub-pixel for improved outdoor visibility. Its main strengths lie in its exceptional ergonomics, pocketable magnesium alloy build, and built-in sensor-shift image stabilization, making it a cult favorite for street photography. However, it is limited by its small sensor size compared to modern APS-C compacts, lacks a built-in viewfinder, and its video capabilities are considered outdated by current standards.

Compare Ricoh GR Digital IV with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ricoh GR Digital IV and other products in the Cameras category

No results found