OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Casio EXILIM EX TR50 Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£580Sensor size:1/1.7"Weight:167 gBattery life (CIPA):240 shots

Casio EXILIM EX TR50 Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.4

Overall score

Score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

90%

4.4

Technical score

10%

4.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 80% of cameras
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

28%

5.3

Sensor & Image

25%

1.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

3.6

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 75% of cameras
4.9

User score

User score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 99% of cameras
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
  • casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50
casio-exilim-ex-tr50

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Casio EXILIM EX TR50

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

28%

5.3

Sensor & Image

25%

1.8

Photo Features

18%

4.2

Video & Audio

14%

7.4

Display & Design

8%

3.6

Battery & Power

7%

5.1

Connectivity & Storage

4.4
User score
User score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

User ratings

30%

2.5

Number of reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
4.9
Popularity
Popularity
2.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
Casio EXILIM EX TR50 has a popularity score of 2.5, which is higher than 50.5% of cameras.
2.5
Value for money
Value for money
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

4.4

Overall score

40%

7.5

Price

5.3
Sensor size
1/1.7"
Sensor size
1/1.7"
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
This camera uses a sensor classified as 1/1.7"; it is smaller than the sensor in 57.3% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 2.3% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
11.1 MP
Main camera megapixels
11.1 MP
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
This camera has a sensor resolution of 11.1 MP, which is lower than that of 95.4% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
1.86 µm
Main camera pixel size
1.86 µm
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 1.86 µm, which are smaller than those in 59.1% of cameras and the same size as those in 0.5% of cameras.
Base ISO
80
Base ISO
80
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <80 – >200
This camera has a base ISO of 80 which is lower than that of 80.3% of cameras and equal to that of 15.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 3200 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 3,200
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 3,200, which is lower than that of 62.9% of cameras and equal to that of 22.7% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
N/A
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
1
N. of focus points
1
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <9 – >399
This camera has 1 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 95.4% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 4.6% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
no
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
This camera does not support phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.5% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
no
AF tracking
no
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This camera does not support AF tracking. 88.1% of cameras support this feature.
Show more
Max video resolution
1920 px
Max video resolution
1920 px
â–² Better than 29% of models
This camera supports 1920 px video recording which is higher quality than that of 28.7% of cameras and equal to that of 47.1% of cameras.
Video bitrate
40 Mbps
Video bitrate
40 Mbps
â–² Better than 64% of models
Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
This camera has a video bitrate of 40 Mbps which is higher than that of 63.5% of cameras and equal to that of 1.1% of cameras.
Video bit depth
8 bit
Video bit depth
8 bit
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This camera supports video at 8 bit, a bit depth higher than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 80.6% of cameras.
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
Video chroma subsampling
4:2:0
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This camera supports 4:2:0 video chroma subsampling which is more advanced than that of 7.8% of cameras and equal to that of 69.9% of cameras.
Video codecs
H.264
Show more
Type
compact
Weight
167 g
Weight
167 g
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <142 g – >812 g
This camera weighs 167 g which is lighter than 85.5% of cameras.
Width
126 mm
Width
126 mm
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
This camera has a width of 126 mm which is wider than 63.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.6% of cameras.
Height
64 mm
Height
64 mm
â–² Better than 69% of models
Market range: <57.6 mm – >105.8 mm
This camera has a height of 64 mm which is shorter than 69.1% of cameras and equal to that of 0.8% of cameras.
Thickness
15 mm
Thickness
15 mm
★ Better than 100% of models
Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
This camera has a thickness of 15 mm which is thinner than 99.8% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
240 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
240 shots
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 240 shots, which is shorter than that of 76.6% of cameras and equal to that of 2.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
950 mAh
Battery capacity
950 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 950 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 73.2% of cameras and equal to those in 0.7% of cameras.
NP-150 battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
â–² Better than 52% of models
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
802.11b/g/n
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
â–² Better than 54% of models
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) which is newer than that of 54.2% of cameras and equal to that of 35.6% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 23% of models
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
â–¼ Worse than 15% of models
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Casio EXILIM EX TR50 vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 512 fps high-speed video.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 228 g lighter
    Weight
    167 g
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (167 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    167 g vs 395 g
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11b/g/n
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via EXILIM Remote
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Fully articulated screen
    Flip-out screen
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This camera has a fully articulated screen, the average camera does not.
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 228 g lighter
    Weight
    167 g
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <142 g – >812 g
    This camera is lighter than the average camera (167 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    167 g vs 395 g
  • 31 mm thinner
    Thickness
    15 mm
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <21.9 mm – >92 mm
    This camera is thinner than the average camera (15 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    15 mm vs 46 mm
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Supports slow-motion video
    Slow-motion video
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This camera supports slow-motion video, the average camera does not.
    Supports up to 512 fps high-speed video.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 10 Mbps higher video bitrate
    Video bitrate
    40 Mbps
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <12 Mbps – >237 Mbps
    This camera has a higher video bitrate than the average camera (40 Mbps vs 30 Mbps). The average camera records at 30 Mbps.
    40 Mbps vs 30 Mbps
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11b/g/n
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
    via EXILIM Remote
  • 0.05 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    0.0499 GB
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.07 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (0 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    0.0499 GB vs 0 GB
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.7"
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.7" vs APS-C).
    1/1.7" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    11.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (11.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    11.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • 16% worse value for money
    Casio EXILIM EX TR50 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.34 vs 6.2).
    5.34 vs 6.2
  • 61.9% lower user score
    User score
    4.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
    When it matters
    When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Casio EXILIM EX TR50
    the average camera
    Casio EXILIM EX TR50 has a lower user score than the average camera (4.94 vs 8.000).
    4.94 vs 8
  • 2x more expensive
    Casio EXILIM EX TR50 is more expensive than the average camera (£580 vs £290).
    £580 vs £290
  • No hot shoe
    Hot shoe
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This camera does not have a hot shoe, the average camera does.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
    LED light only, not flash.
  • 6.1 mm wider
    Width
    126 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <96 mm – >142.6 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (126 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    126 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • Smaller sensor
    Sensor size
    1/1.7"
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This camera has a smaller sensor than the average camera (1/1.7" vs APS-C).
    1/1.7" vs APS-C
  • Lower sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    11.1 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This camera has a lower sensor resolution than the average camera (11.1 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    11.1 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 1.48 µm smaller sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    1.86 µm
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <1.33 µm – >5.94 µm
    This camera has smaller sensor pixels than the average camera (1.9 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    1.86 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3,200 ISO lower maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    3,200 ISO
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1.6k ISO – >40k ISO
    This camera has a lower maximum sensitivity than the average camera (3200 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    3,200 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • No AF tracking
    AF tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    This camera does not support AF tracking, the average camera does. 88% of cameras support it.
  • 22 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <9 – >399
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (1 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    1 vs 23
  • No RAW photo capture
    RAW photo capture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This camera does not support RAW photo capture, the average camera does. 62.8% of cameras support RAW formats.
  • No manual focus mode
    Manual focus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual focus, the average camera does. 71.7% of cameras include a manual focus mode.
    Fixed-focus design.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This camera does not support manual exposure, the average camera does. 72% of cameras support manual exposure controls.
    No true manual exposure mode.
  • 29 s shorter maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    1 s
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <4 s – >1.8k s
    This camera supports a shorter maximum exposure than the average camera (1 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    1 s vs 30 s
  • 85.9% less optical zoom
    Optical zoom
    1 x
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 x – >35 x
    40% less optical zoom: this camera offers 1 x, compared with 7.1 x on the average camera.
    The fixed built-in lens has no optical zoom range, equivalent to 1x.
    1 x vs 7.1 x
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (1 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    1 vs 2
  • 90 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    240 shots
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <210 shots – >700 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (240 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    240 shots vs 330 shots
  • 170 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    950 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <700 mAh – >2.2k mAh
    This camera has a lower battery capacity than the average camera (950 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    NP-150 battery.
    950 mAh vs 1,120 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
marcuslowphotos.wordpress.com
25/05/2015
Summary of the review
Why Casio TR is the craziest camera on earth {review}
S
superadrianme.com
29/12/2014
Summary of the review
CASIO TR50, MR1 & ZR50 - Which Is Better For You?

Third-party reviews

Based on 2 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Casio EXILIM EX TR50

  • Unique hinged body and swiveling frame allow for creative composition and hands-free use
  • Excellent for self-portraits with dedicated 'Make-up Plus' modes and skin tone bracketing
  • High-speed 1/1.7-inch CMOS sensor provides improved image quality over previous models
  • Includes built-in Wi-Fi for easy smartphone connectivity and remote shooting
  • Bright LED flash helps capture better photos in dark or backlit conditions
  • Extremely pocketable and lightweight design makes it an ideal street or travel camera

What we don't like about Casio EXILIM EX TR50

  • Very high initial price point, often described as 'overpriced' for its niche focus
  • Fixed 21mm wide-angle lens lacks optical zoom, limiting its versatility for non-selfie subjects
  • Touchscreen uses resistive technology rather than capacitive, which can feel less responsive
  • Highly specialized 'selfie' marketing may not appeal to general photography enthusiasts
  • Audio recording for video is monaural only

Verdict

The Casio Exilim EX-TR50 is a specialized compact 'selfie' camera featuring a unique 360-degree rotating frame and a 270-degree swiveling 3-inch 921k-dot touchscreen for flexible composition. It is equipped with an 11.1-megapixel 1/1.7-inch BSI-CMOS sensor, a fast F2.8 21mm equivalent wide-angle lens, and the Exilim Engine HS Ver. 3 for high-speed processing. Key pros include its advanced Make-up Plus modes for skin enhancement, built-in Wi-Fi for instant smartphone sharing, and a high-brightness LED for low-light portraits. However, cons include a fixed focal length with no optical zoom, relatively short battery life of approximately 240 shots, and the lack of a traditional viewfinder or physical image stabilisation.

Compare Casio EXILIM EX TR50 with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Casio EXILIM EX TR50 and other products in the Cameras category

No results found