Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

Oculus Quest Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90Weight:571 gResolution:1440x1600Refresh rate:72 HzDisplay type:OLEDDevice type:standalone

Oculus Quest Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.2

Technical Score

20%

8.7

User score

▲Better than 55% of vr-headsets
6.2

Technical Score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

5.4

Display & Optics

22%

7.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.7

Controls & Audio

4%

4.1

Hardware

3%

6.8

Connectivity

3%

5.5

Design & Power

▼Worse than 57% of vr-headsets
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 6,613 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 88% of vr-headsets
  • oculus-quest
oculus-quest

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset Oculus Quest

Technical Score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

5.4

Display & Optics

22%

7.5

Tracking & Sensors

10%

8.7

Controls & Audio

4%

4.1

Hardware

3%

6.8

Connectivity

3%

5.5

Design & Power

6.2
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 6,613 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Oculus Quest has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 89.8% of VR headsets.
10
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
Resolution
1440x1600
Resolution
1440x1600
This vr headset has a screen resolution of 1440x1600 which is lower than that of 51.3% of VR headsets and equal to that of 15.4% of VR headsets.
Screen size
3.5 inches
Refresh rate
72 Hz
Refresh rate
72 Hz
This vr headset supports a refresh rate of 72 Hz which is lower than in 92.3% of VR headsets and equal to that in 5.1% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (horizontal)
95 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
95 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 95 ° which is narrower than that of 78.3% of VR headsets and equal to that of 4.4% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
92 °
Visible FoV (vertical)
92 °
This vr headset offers a vertical FoV of 92 ° which is narrower than that of 71.4% of VR headsets and equal to that of 2.9% of VR headsets.
Show more
Tracking type
inside-out
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
4
N. of cameras
4
N. of cameras
4
This vr headset has 4 cameras which is more than in 60.4% of VR headsets and equal to that in 12.5% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Android
OpenXR support
yes
OpenXR support
yes
This vr headset supports OpenXR. 38.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Native support since v19.
Wireless PC streaming
no
Wireless PC streaming
no
This vr headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 38.8% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Third-party apps only.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This vr headset has Wi-Fi. 63.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 5
This vr headset supports Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5, which is more advanced than 67.4% of VR headsets and equal to 8.2% of VR headsets.
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
Oculus spatial-audio support.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
This vr headset has 2 speakers which is more than in 39.1% of VR headsets and equal to that in 60.9% of VR headsets.
Integrated stereo speakers.
N. of microphones
2
N. of microphones
2
This vr headset includes 2 microphones, which is more than 46.7% of VR headsets and equal to 46.7% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
standalone
Chipset
Snapdragon 835
Chipset
Snapdragon 835
This vr headset uses the Snapdragon 835 processor model which is slower than processors in 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to processors in 11.1% of VR headsets.
CPU clock speed
2.45 GHz
CPU clock speed
2.45 GHz
This vr headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.45 GHz which is lower than that of 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to that of 11.1% of VR headsets.
Peak performance-core clock.
GPU model
Adreno 540
GPU model
Adreno 540
This vr headset uses the Adreno 540 GPU model, which is less advanced than that used in 66.7%.
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
This vr headset has 4 GB of RAM, which is less than 66.7% of VR headsets and equal to 11.1% of VR headsets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,648 mAh
Battery capacity
3,648 mAh
This vr headset has a battery capacity of 3,648 mAh which is lower than that of 70.6% of VR headsets.
One source cites 5,000 mAh.
Charging time
2.5 h
Charging time
2.5 h
This vr headset recharges in 2.5 h, which is slower than 73.3% of VR headsets and equal to 6.7% of VR headsets.
Official estimate with the included 18W adapter.
Weight
571 g
Weight
571 g
This vr headset weighs 571 g which is lighter than 53.3% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
elastic strap
Headstrap type
elastic strap
This vr headset uses a elastic strap headstrap, which is less comfortable than the design on 61.2%.
Body material
plastic
Show more

Oculus Quest vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Grayscale passthrough.
  • Supports hand tracking
    Hand tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
    Added by software update.
  • Wider IPD adjustment range
    IPD adjustment range
    58–72 mm
    This vr headset has a higher IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (58–72 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
    58–72 mm vs 60–70 mm
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Voice Commands / Meta AI.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    4 vs 2
  • Larger tracking area
    Tracking area
    15 x 15 m
    This vr headset has a higher tracking area than the average VR headset (15x15 m vs 10x10 m). The average VR headset supports a tracking area of 10x10 m.
    15x15 m vs 10x10 m
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Visible in headset UI.
  • Wider IPD adjustment range
    IPD adjustment range
    58–72 mm
    This vr headset has a higher IPD adjustment range than the average VR headset (58–72 mm vs 60–70 mm). The average VR headset supports an IPD adjustment range of 60–70 mm.
    58–72 mm vs 60–70 mm
  • See-through mode
    See-through mode
    yes
    This vr headset supports see-through mode, the average VR headset does not. 44% of VR headsets offer passthrough viewing.
    Grayscale passthrough.
  • Supports hand tracking
    Hand tracking
    yes
    This vr headset supports hand tracking, the average VR headset does not. 24% of VR headsets support hand tracking.
    Added by software update.
  • 2 more cameras
    N. of cameras
    4
    This vr headset has more cameras than the average VR headset (4 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    4 vs 2
  • Larger tracking area
    Tracking area
    15 x 15 m
    This vr headset has a higher tracking area than the average VR headset (15x15 m vs 10x10 m). The average VR headset supports a tracking area of 10x10 m.
    15x15 m vs 10x10 m
  • Has Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This vr headset has Wi-Fi, the average VR headset does not. 38% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
  • Compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    yes
    This vr headset is compatible with iOS, the average VR headset is not. 34.7% of VR headsets support iPhone or iPad integration.
    Meta Horizon app required.
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Voice Commands / Meta AI.
  • 12.9% lighter controllers
    Controller weight
    135 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (135 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    Without battery.
    135 g vs 155 g
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Visible in headset UI.
  • 5 °C higher maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    40 °C
    This vr headset has a higher maximum operating temperature than the average VR headset (40 °C vs 35 °C). The average VR headset reaches a maximum operating temperature of 35 °C.
    40 °C vs 35 °C
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    This vr headset uses OLED for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    OLED vs Micro-OLED
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    72 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • 5 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    95 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (95 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    95 ° vs 100 °
  • 3.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    92 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (92 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    92 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1440x1600
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1440x1600 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1440x1600 vs 1830x1464
  • 12.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    538 ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Inferior headstrap type
    Headstrap type
    elastic strap
    This vr headset uses a elastic strap headstrap, while the average VR headset uses rigid halo.
    elastic strap vs rigid halo
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    2
    This vr headset has fewer memory channels than the average VR headset (2 vs 4). The average VR headset supports 4 memory channels.
    2 vs 4
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    This vr headset uses OLED for display type, while the average VR headset uses Micro-OLED.
    OLED vs Micro-OLED
  • 20% lower refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    72 Hz
    This vr headset has a lower refresh rate than the average VR headset (72 Hz vs 90 Hz). The average VR headset has a refresh rate of 90 Hz.
    72 Hz vs 90 Hz
  • 5 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    95 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (95 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    95 ° vs 100 °
  • 3.5 ° narrower vertical FoV
    Visible FoV (vertical)
    92 °
    This vr headset has a lower vertical visible FoV than the average VR headset (92 ° vs 95.5 °). The average VR headset offers a vertical visible FoV of 95.5 °.
    92 ° vs 95.5 °
  • Lower screen resolution
    Resolution
    1440x1600
    This vr headset has a lower screen resolution than the average VR headset (1440x1600 vs 1830x1464). The average VR headset has a screen resolution of 1830x1464.
    1440x1600 vs 1830x1464
  • 12.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    538 ppi
    This vr headset has a lower pixel density than the average VR headset (538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi). The average VR headset has a pixel density of 615.5 ppi.
    538 ppi vs 615.5 ppi
  • Old Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This vr headset supports an older Bluetooth version than the average VR headset (5 vs 5.2). The average VR headset uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • 2 fewer memory channels
    Memory channels
    2
    This vr headset has fewer memory channels than the average VR headset (2 vs 4). The average VR headset supports 4 memory channels.
    2 vs 4
  • 4 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    4 GB
    This vr headset has a lower RAM capacity than the average VR headset (4 GB vs 8 GB). The average VR headset has a RAM capacity of 8 GB.
    4 GB vs 8 GB
  • 3,467 MHz slower memory speed
    RAM speed
    1,866 MHz
    This vr headset has a lower RAM speed than the average VR headset (1866 MHz vs 5333 MHz). The average VR headset has a RAM speed of 5333 MHz.
    1,866 MHz vs 5,333 MHz
  • 566.5 lower single-core score
    Geekbench 5 single-core score
    256
    This vr headset has a lower Geekbench 5 single-core score than the average VR headset (256 vs 822.5). The average VR headset has a Geekbench 5 single-core score of 822.5.
    256 vs 822.5
  • 0.39 GHz lower CPU clock speed
    CPU clock speed
    2.45 GHz
    This vr headset has a lower CPU clock speed than the average VR headset (2.5 GHz vs 2.84 GHz). The average VR headset has a CPU clock speed of 2.84 GHz.
    Peak performance-core clock.
    2.45 GHz vs 2.84 GHz
  • 1,197.5 lower multi-core score
    Geekbench 5 multi-core score
    774
    This vr headset has a lower Geekbench 5 multi-core score than the average VR headset (774 vs 1,971.5). The average VR headset has a Geekbench 5 multi-core score of 1,971.5.
    774 vs 1,971.5
  • 3 nm larger process node
    Process node
    10 nm
    This vr headset has a higher process node than the average VR headset (10 nm vs 7 nm). The average VR headset uses a process node of 7 nm.
    10 nm vs 7 nm
  • Inferior headstrap type
    Headstrap type
    elastic strap
    This vr headset uses a elastic strap headstrap, while the average VR headset uses rigid halo.
    elastic strap vs rigid halo
  • 0.5 h slower charging
    Charging time
    2.5 h
    This vr headset has a higher charging time than the average VR headset (2.5 h vs 2 h). The average VR headset reaches a charging time of 2 h.
    Official estimate with the included 18W adapter.
    2.5 h vs 2 h
  • 12.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,648 mAh
    This vr headset has a lower battery capacity than the average VR headset (3648 mAh vs 4162 mAh). The average VR headset has a battery capacity of 4162 mAh.
    One source cites 5,000 mAh.
    3,648 mAh vs 4,162 mAh

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gamestar.de
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
03/05/2019
Summary of the review
W
welt.de
05/05/2019
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
21/05/2019
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
05/06/2019
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
07/03/2020
Summary of the review
N
netzpiloten.de
10/02/2020
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.de
13/06/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/05/2019
Summary of the review
F
fr.ign.com
02/05/2019
Summary of the review
L
leparisien.fr
20/05/2019
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2020
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
10/03/2021
Summary of the review
A
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
27/09/2019
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
R
realovirtual.com
14/10/2020
Summary of the review
E
es.ign.com
30/05/2019
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.es
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
30/04/2026
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
03/05/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
06/05/2019
Summary of the review
I
it.ign.com
15/05/2019
Summary of the review
V
vr-italia.org
10/08/2019
Summary of the review
X
xgn.nl
18/05/2019
Summary of the review
W
want.nl
30/04/2019
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
02/08/2019
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
26/12/2019
Summary of the review
G
gadgetgear.nl
01/12/2019
Summary of the review
I
immersivetraining.be
21/05/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 6,613 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Oculus Quest

  • Standalone wireless design with no PC or external sensors required
  • High-quality OLED display with vibrant colors and true blacks
  • Accurate 6DOF (six degrees of freedom) head and controller tracking
  • Quick and easy setup with the Guardian boundary system
  • Support for PC VR titles via Oculus Link cable
  • Decent built-in spatial audio

What we don't like about Oculus Quest

  • Heavy and front-loaded design causing discomfort during long sessions
  • Relatively short battery life (approximately 2–3 hours)
  • Rigid side straps can make it bulky to pack for travel
  • Lower 72Hz refresh rate compared to newer models and PC headsets
  • Noticeable screen-door effect due to lower pixel density
  • Occasional tracking issues in bright sunlight or very dark rooms

Verdict

The Oculus Quest is a pioneering standalone VR headset featuring dual PenTile OLED displays with a resolution of 1440x1600 per eye and a 72Hz refresh rate. Powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 chipset and 4GB of RAM, it offers true six-degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) tracking without the need for external sensors or a PC. Its main strengths include a completely wireless experience, vibrant colors and deep blacks thanks to the OLED panels, and a manual IPD adjustment slider for visual comfort. However, it is often criticized for being front-heavy at approximately 571g, having a relatively short battery life of about 2 to 2.5 hours, and utilizing an aging processor that limits the graphical complexity of newer titles compared to its successors.

Compare Oculus Quest with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oculus Quest and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found