Scored using VR headsets Methodology v1.0
VR headsets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo VR headsets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v1.0

Google Daydream View Review | 89 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Weight:220 gResolution:N/ARefresh rate:N/A HzDisplay type:N/ADevice type:smartphone VR

Google Daydream View Review: Compare 89 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the VR headset's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best VR headsets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.6

Technical Score

20%

7.2

User score

▼Worse than 88% of vr-headsets
4.6

Technical Score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

58%

3.9

Display & Optics

22%

4.8

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

4.1

Connectivity

3%

7.0

Design & Power

▼Worse than 92% of vr-headsets
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 1,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 86% of vr-headsets
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
  • google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view
google-daydream-view

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of VR headset Google Daydream View

Technical Score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the VR headsets category across these key areas: Display & Optics, Tracking & Sensors, Connectivity, Controls & Audio, Hardware, Design & Power.
When it matters
When you want to compare VR headsets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

58%

3.9

Display & Optics

22%

4.8

Tracking & Sensors

10%

7.6

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

4.1

Connectivity

3%

7.0

Design & Power

4.6
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.7

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 1,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the VR headset.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Google Daydream View has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than 71.4% of VR headsets.
8.6
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.6
Resolution
N/A
Screen size
N/A
Refresh rate
N/A
Visible FoV (horizontal)
90 °
Visible FoV (horizontal)
90 °
This vr headset offers a horizontal FoV of 90 ° which is narrower than that of 87% of VR headsets.
Visible FoV (vertical)
N/A
Show more
Tracking type
3DoF internal sensors
360° head tracking
yes
360° head tracking
yes
This vr headset supports full 360° head tracking. 2% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
0
N. of cameras
0
N. of cameras
0
This vr headset has 0 cameras which is fewer than in 64.6% of VR headsets and equal to that in 35.4% of VR headsets.
Uses smartphone camera.
Tracking frequency
N/A
Show more
Operating system
Android
OpenXR support
no
OpenXR support
no
This vr headset does not support OpenXR. 63.3% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
no
Wireless PC streaming
no
This vr headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 38.8% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Third-party phone-streaming apps only.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This vr headset does not have Wi-Fi. 38.8% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Uses smartphone Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
Touch controllers
yes
Touch controllers
yes
This vr headset includes touch controllers. 28.6% of VR headsets come with dedicated hand controllers.
Includes one 3DoF controller.
Game controller included
yes
Game controller included
yes
This vr headset includes a game controller. 36.7% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
yes
Spatial audio
yes
This vr headset supports spatial audio. 10.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
Supported via Google VR SDK / Resonance Audio.
N. of speakers
0
N. of speakers
0
This vr headset has 0 speakers which is fewer than in 63% of VR headsets and equal to that in 37% of VR headsets.
N. of microphones
0
N. of microphones
0
This vr headset includes 0 microphones, which is fewer than 71.1% of VR headsets and equal to 28.9% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
smartphone VR
Chipset
N/A
CPU clock speed
N/A
GPU model
N/A
RAM capacity
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Weight
220 g
Weight
220 g
This vr headset weighs 220 g which is lighter than 95.6% of VR headsets.
1st generation.
Headstrap type
elastic strap
Headstrap type
elastic strap
This vr headset uses a elastic strap headstrap, which is less comfortable than the design on 61.2%.
Body material
plastic
Show more

Google Daydream View vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplay & OpticsTracking & SensorsConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    aspheric
    This vr headset uses aspheric lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    Original 2016 model.
    aspheric vs fresnel
  • 62.3% lighter
    Weight
    220 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (220 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    1st generation.
    220 g vs 583 g
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Via Google Assistant / supported Daydream apps.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    Daydream handheld controller.
  • 74.2% lighter controllers
    Controller weight
    40 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (40 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    40 g vs 155 g
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Shows phone battery in dashboard.
  • 23.2 mm narrower
    Width
    166.8 mm
    This vr headset is narrower than the average VR headset (166.8 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    166.8 mm vs 190 mm
  • Better lens type
    Lens type
    aspheric
    This vr headset uses aspheric lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    Original 2016 model.
    aspheric vs fresnel
  • Supports voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This vr headset supports voice commands, the average VR headset does not. 43.8% of VR headsets include voice command functionality.
    Via Google Assistant / supported Daydream apps.
  • Includes remote control
    Remote control
    yes
    This vr headset includes a remote control, the average VR headset does not.
    Daydream handheld controller.
  • 74.2% lighter controllers
    Controller weight
    40 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (40 g vs 155 g). The average controller weighs 155 g.
    40 g vs 155 g
  • 62.3% lighter
    Weight
    220 g
    This vr headset is lighter than the average VR headset (220 g vs 583 g). The average VR headset weighs 583 g.
    1st generation.
    220 g vs 583 g
  • Battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    yes
    This vr headset has a battery level indicator, the average VR headset does not. 46% of VR headsets include a battery level indicator.
    Shows phone battery in dashboard.
  • 23.2 mm narrower
    Width
    166.8 mm
    This vr headset is narrower than the average VR headset (166.8 mm vs 190 mm). The average VR headset has a width of 190 mm.
    166.8 mm vs 190 mm
  • No adjustable IPD
    Adjustable IPD
    no
    This vr headset does not support adjustable IPD, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer adjustable lens spacing.
  • 10 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    90 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (90 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    90 ° vs 100 °
  • 8 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    42 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (42 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    Approximate value.
    42 mm vs 50 mm
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • Fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This vr headset includes fewer microphones than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset includes 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer cameras
    N. of cameras
    0
    This vr headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    Uses smartphone camera.
    0 vs 2
  • No accelerometer
    Accelerometer
    no
    This vr headset does not have an accelerometer, the average VR headset does. 86% of VR headsets include an accelerometer.
  • Fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    0
    This vr headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • 10.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the VR headset.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a VR headset performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Daydream View
    the average VR headset
    Google Daydream View has a lower user score than the average VR headset (7.24 vs 8.000).
    7.24 vs 8
  • No adjustable IPD
    Adjustable IPD
    no
    This vr headset does not support adjustable IPD, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer adjustable lens spacing.
  • 10 ° narrower horizontal FoV
    Visible FoV (horizontal)
    90 °
    This vr headset has a lower horizontal visible FoV than the average VR headset (90 ° vs 100 °). The average VR headset offers a horizontal visible FoV of 100 °.
    90 ° vs 100 °
  • 8 mm smaller lens diameter
    Lens diameter
    42 mm
    This vr headset has a lower lens diameter than the average VR headset (42 mm vs 50 mm). The average VR headset has a lens diameter of 50 mm.
    Approximate value.
    42 mm vs 50 mm
  • No accelerometer
    Accelerometer
    no
    This vr headset does not have an accelerometer, the average VR headset does. 86% of VR headsets include an accelerometer.
  • 2 fewer cameras
    N. of cameras
    0
    This vr headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    Uses smartphone camera.
    0 vs 2
  • No OpenXR support
    OpenXR support
    no
    This vr headset does not support OpenXR, the average VR headset does. 62% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
  • Lacks USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    This vr headset lacks a USB Type-C port, the average VR headset includes one. 58% of VR headsets use USB-C ports.
    USB-C is only on the separate controller.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    This vr headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 60% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
    Controller uses 3.5 mm audio via the phone, not the headset.
  • No haptic feedback
    Haptic feedback
    no
    This vr headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 64% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • Fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This vr headset includes fewer microphones than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset includes 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    0
    This vr headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • Inferior headstrap type
    Headstrap type
    elastic strap
    This vr headset uses a elastic strap headstrap, while the average VR headset uses rigid halo.
    elastic strap vs rigid halo
  • 2 older release date
    Release date
    2016
    This vr headset is older than the average VR headset (2016 vs 2018). The average VR headset was released in 2018.
    November 2016
    2016 vs 2018

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theverge.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
theguardian.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
R
roadtovr.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
time.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
M
mashable.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
N
nymag.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
M
mirror.co.uk
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
A
adamfowlerit.com
13/01/2017
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
B
businessinsider.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
D
droid-life.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
canadianreviewer.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
W
wsj.com
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
Z
zeit.de
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
25/11/2016
Summary of the review
R
rp-online.de
11/11/2016
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
10/11/2017
Summary of the review
F
faz.net
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
M
mixed.de
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
S
schieb.de
14/11/2016
Summary of the review
R
realite-virtuelle.com
02/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
thierryvanoffe.com
29/06/2023
Summary of the review
E
es.gizmodo.com
05/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
pisapapeles.net
01/02/2017
Summary of the review
W
wired.it
05/10/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
29/11/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,856 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Google Daydream View

  • Lightweight and comfortable design featuring soft, breathable fabric
  • Intuitive and easy-to-use motion controller included
  • Highly portable and simpler to set up compared to competitors
  • Affordable entry point into virtual reality
  • Removable and washable face padding for better hygiene
  • Fits well over prescription glasses for many users
  • Seamless integration with Google services like YouTube VR and Street View

What we don't like about Google Daydream View

  • Frequent phone overheating issues during extended use
  • Noticeable light leakage around the nose bridge
  • Limited field of view (FOV) compared to high-end headsets
  • Small library of high-quality games and apps
  • Controller frequently suffers from 'drift' and requires recalibration
  • No support for iOS (iPhone) devices
  • Lacks advanced tracking (3DoF only; no positional tracking)
  • Significant 'screen door effect' (visible pixels) depending on the phone used

Verdict

The Google Daydream View is a lightweight, fabric-clad mobile VR headset designed for 'Daydream-ready' Android smartphones, weighing approximately 220g (2016 model) to 261g (2017 model). It features custom lenses—with the 2017 version utilizing Fresnel optics for an improved 90-degree field of view—and includes a 3DoF wireless motion controller equipped with a clickable touchpad, 9-axis IMU sensors, and a 220mAh rechargeable battery. Main characteristics include its breathable cloth construction, NFC auto-launch capabilities, and a dedicated storage slot for the controller. Its primary pros are its exceptional comfort for glasses wearers, portability, and user-friendly setup that bypasses complex cables. However, notable cons include a limited library of compatible apps, light leakage around the nose area, and the potential for compatible phones to overheat during extended VR sessions.

Compare Google Daydream View with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Daydream View and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found