OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using VR headsets Methodology v3.0
VR headsets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum VR headsets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore VR headsets Methodology v3.0

Heromask Neo review: 90 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Weight:420 gResolution:N/ARefresh rate:N/A HzDisplay type:N/ADevice type:smartphone VR

Heromask Neo Review: Compare 90 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the VR headsets category and whether it is worth buying.

Heromask Neo
6.9/10

Overall score

Score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models
Score components

35%

6.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

▲Better than 56% of VR headsets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 82%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components

58%

7.5

Display

22%

3.9

Tracking

10%

5.4

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

4.4

Connectivity

3%

7.8

Design & Power

▲Better than 50%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
  • heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
heromask-neo
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

VR headsets model ranking

Ranked #24 of 63 models in VR headsets (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of VR headset Heromask Neo

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Score components:

58%

7.5

Display

22%

3.9

Tracking

10%

5.4

Controls & Audio

4%

4.0

Hardware

3%

4.4

Connectivity

3%

7.8

Design & Power

6.3
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the VR headset's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a VR headset with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 82% of models
Score components:

70%

6.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.9
Resolution
N/A
Screen size
N/A
Refresh rate
N/A
Visible FoV (horizontal)
?
Visible FoV (vertical)
?
Show more
Tracking type
3DoF internal sensors
360° head tracking
yes
This VR headset supports full 360° head tracking. 1.6% of VR headsets support this tracking mode.
N. of tracking sensors
0
N. of cameras
0
Market range: <0 – >6
This VR headset has 0 cameras which is fewer than in 55.6% of VR headsets and equal to that in 44.4% of VR headsets.
Tracking frequency
?
Show more
Operating system
Android/iOS
OpenXR support
no
This VR headset does not support OpenXR. 57.8% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
Wireless PC streaming
no
This VR headset does not support wireless PC streaming. 31.3% of VR headsets support cable-free PC VR streaming.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This VR headset does not have Wi-Fi. 31.3% of VR headsets have Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Show more
Touch controllers
?
Game controller included
no
This VR headset does not include a game controller. 60.3% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
Spatial audio
no
This VR headset does not support spatial audio. 85% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
N. of speakers
0
Market range: <0 – >2
This VR headset has 0 speakers which is fewer than in 58.3% of VR headsets and equal to that in 41.7% of VR headsets.
N. of microphones
0
Market range: <0 – >2
This VR headset includes 0 microphones, which is fewer than 61% of VR headsets and equal to 39% of VR headsets.
Show more
Device type
smartphone VR
Chipset
N/A
CPU clock speed
N/A
GPU model
N/A
RAM capacity
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery life
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Weight
420 g
Market range: <295 g – >800 g
This VR headset weighs 420 g which is lighter than 69% of VR headsets and equal to the weight of 1.7% of VR headsets.
Headstrap type
?
Show more

Heromask Neo vs the average VR headset

246810TotalDisplayTrackingConnectivityControls & AudioHardwareDesign & Power
  • Better lens type
    This VR headset uses aspheric lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    aspheric vs fresnel
  • Adjustable diopter
    This VR headset supports adjustable diopter, the average VR headset does not. 21.9% of VR headsets offer built-in diopter adjustment.
  • 25% lighter
    This VR headset is lighter than the average VR headset (420 g vs 560 g). The average VR headset weighs 560 g.
    420 g vs 560 g
  • Compatible with iOS
    This VR headset is compatible with iOS, the average VR headset is not. 40.6% of VR headsets support iPhone or iPad integration.
  • Better lens type
    This VR headset uses aspheric lenses, while the average VR headset uses fresnel lenses.
    aspheric vs fresnel
  • Adjustable diopter
    This VR headset supports adjustable diopter, the average VR headset does not. 21.9% of VR headsets offer built-in diopter adjustment.
  • Compatible with iOS
    This VR headset is compatible with iOS, the average VR headset is not. 40.6% of VR headsets support iPhone or iPad integration.
  • 25% lighter
    This VR headset is lighter than the average VR headset (420 g vs 560 g). The average VR headset weighs 560 g.
    420 g vs 560 g
  • No haptic feedback
    This VR headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 55.4% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • No spatial audio
    This VR headset does not support spatial audio, the average VR headset does. 83.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
  • 2 fewer cameras
    This VR headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer speakers
    This VR headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • No OpenXR support
    This VR headset does not support OpenXR, the average VR headset does. 56.9% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
  • No game controller included
    This VR headset does not include a game controller, the average VR headset does. 59.4% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
  • Lacks USB Type-C
    This VR headset lacks a USB Type-C port, the average VR headset includes one. 55.6% of VR headsets use USB-C ports.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    This VR headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 54.7% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • 2 fewer cameras
    This VR headset has fewer cameras than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 cameras.
    0 vs 2
  • No OpenXR support
    This VR headset does not support OpenXR, the average VR headset does. 56.9% of VR headsets support this cross-platform VR standard.
  • Lacks USB Type-C
    This VR headset lacks a USB Type-C port, the average VR headset includes one. 55.6% of VR headsets use USB-C ports.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    This VR headset does not include a 3.5 mm audio jack, the average VR headset does. 54.7% of VR headsets include wired audio output.
  • No haptic feedback
    This VR headset does not support haptic feedback, the average VR headset does. 55.4% of VR headsets offer haptics in the headset or controllers.
  • No spatial audio
    This VR headset does not support spatial audio, the average VR headset does. 83.6% of VR headsets support spatial audio.
  • 2 fewer speakers
    This VR headset has fewer speakers than the average VR headset (0 vs 2). The average VR headset has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2
  • No game controller included
    This VR headset does not include a game controller, the average VR headset does. 59.4% of VR headsets ship with controllers in the box.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This VR headset includes fewer microphones than the average VR headset (0 vs 1). The average VR headset includes 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Heromask Neo

  • Adjustable eye spacing and focus help the picture suit each user.
  • Aspheric lenses keep the picture sharp from edge to edge.
  • Better light blocking keeps outside light out of the view.
  • Head turns are tracked in 360°, so the view follows where you look.
  • It works with both iPhone and Android phones.
  • Anti-fog ventilation keeps the lenses clearer during use.

What customers don't like about Heromask Neo

  • At 420 g it feels heavy after a long session.
  • Head tracking covers turns only, so you cannot walk through a game.
  • There are no speakers, so sound comes from the phone or headphones.
  • There are no controllers, so your hands cannot take part in games.

Verdict

A phone player who wants fast action will like the Heromask Neo, a headset for adults with aspheric lenses. Eye spacing and focus can both be adjusted for each user, which keeps the picture sharp from edge to edge. Better light blocking keeps outside light out, so nothing pulls you out of the game. Head turns are tracked in three directions, so you can look around in games, roller coaster rides and 360° videos. Side openings let a headphone cable pass out, and anti-fog ventilation keeps the lenses clear. The trade-off is weight: at 420 g it feels heavy after a long session. It suits someone whose phone screen fits 16.5 x 8 cm and who wants games, films and rides, and can live with the extra weight.

Compare Heromask Neo with other products in the VR headsets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Heromask Neo and other products in the VR headsets category

No results found