OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:8.8 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 9400+

Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB)
8.6/10

Overall score

Score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

90%

8.6

Technical score

10%

8.8

User score

★Better than 94% of tablets
8.6

Value for money

Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

★Better than 97%
8.6

Technical score

Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

8.5

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

8.3

Design

3%

6.3

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 94%
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 86%
  • xiaomi-pad-mini-8gb-256gb-wifi
xiaomi-pad-mini-8gb-256gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 256GB12GB + 512GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components:

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.6

Camera

14%

8.5

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.8

Software & Features

5%

8.3

Design

3%

6.3

Audio & Multimedia

8.6
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

7.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 7.6 points, which is lower than 74.3% of Tablets.
7.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 97% of models
Score components:

70%

8.6

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

8.6
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
3 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 3 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 96.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 3.3% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
2,663 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 2,663 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 95.2% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 88.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3008×1880
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3008×1880 which is higher than that of 95.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
165 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 165 Hz which is higher than in 98.8% of tablets and equal to that in 1.2% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
403 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 403 ppi which is higher than that of 99.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 5
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass which is stronger than that on 93.8% of tablets and equal to that on 5.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 63.7% of tablets and equal to those in 1.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
67 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 67 W which is faster than in 95.6% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.9% of tablets.
Battery life
15.5 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 15.5 hours, which is longer than that of 89.8% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
HyperOS 2
This tablet uses the HyperOS 2 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 77%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
326 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 326 g which is lighter than 87.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.75x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 5.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    15.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 86.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.73 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3008×1880 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3008×1880 vs 1920×1200
  • 3.72x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (67 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    67 W vs 18 W
  • 4.31x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (8,153 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,153 points vs 1,891 points
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 21.1% better value for money
    Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (8.6 vs 7.1).
    8.6 vs 7.1
  • 10.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.84 vs 8.000).
    8.84 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 86.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.73 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4.31x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (8,153 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    8,153 points vs 1,891 points
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 3.65x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2,663 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,663 points vs 729 points
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 8,801 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (10,667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    10,667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.58x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    68.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 78.6% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (3 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    3 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.48x faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,612 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,612 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Immortalis-G925 MC12 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Immortalis-G925 MC12 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 2.75x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (165 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    165 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3008×1880 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3008×1880 vs 1920×1200
  • 299 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (700 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    700 nits vs 401 nits
  • 200 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    600 nits vs 400 nits
  • 79.9% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (403 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    403 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    95.5% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 182 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (403 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    403 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 3.1x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (372 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    372 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1400:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,400:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 5.5 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (15.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    15.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 3.72x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (67 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    67 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 14% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    7,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This tablet supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • 33.5% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (326 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    326 g vs 490 g
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.54 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.46 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    September 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 43.27 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (132 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    132.03 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HyperOS 2 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HyperOS 2 vs Android
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 46.2% more expensive
    Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£380 vs £260).
    £380 vs £260
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 1.3 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.28 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.28 vs f/2.2
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (HyperOS 2 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    HyperOS 2 vs Android
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Eufracio López 502
≈ estimated
10/01/2026
Full review · camera, video and feature tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is compact, has a large battery and suits most buyers.
9.0
Eufracio López 502
≈ estimated
10/01/2026
Full review · camera, video and feature tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is compact, has a large battery and suits most buyers.
8.0
NL Tech
≈ estimated
03/10/2025
Review · battery, charging and port tests
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is not perfect, but its excellent size and performance make it tempting to buy.
9.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
24/09/2025
Hands-on review · one-hand use, work and gaming
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is an excellent compact tablet, especially for one-handed use and two-handed gaming.
9.0
Chigz Tech Reviews
≈ estimated
24/09/2025
Full review · hardware, gaming test and pros and cons
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is a small tablet with solid performance, though its cameras and HDR brightness are limited.
9.0
ben's gadget reviews
≈ estimated
24/09/2025
Hands-on review · one-hand use, work and gaming
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is an excellent compact tablet, especially for one-handed use and two-handed gaming.
9.0
Izami Gadget English
≈ estimated
11/11/2025
Hands-on review · one week of daily use
Verdict
Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi is a premium compact flagship that leads on display, battery and charging, but has only an adequate camera.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
30/09/2025
Summary of the review
The Xiaomi Pad Mini is the best Android tablet you can't buy
A
androidcentral.com
29/09/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini is the iPad mini alternative I've always wanted
N
notebookcheck.net
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
Cheaper, faster and more modern than the Apple iPad Mini - Xiaomi Pad Mini tablet review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini review: The best tablet you can't buy
G
gadgetpilipinas.net
01/10/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini Review
P
pinoymetrogeek.com
01/10/2025
Summary of the review
5 Best Features that Make the Xiaomi Pad Mini the Compact Tablet You Need
1
1side0.net
01/12/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini Full Review - A Compact Tablet That Punches Above Its Size
D
designs-now.com
30/09/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini Review: Compact, Powerful, and Ready for Anything
P
pinoymetrogeek.com
01/10/2025
Summary of the review
Sample photo comparison between 1x and 2x zoom for the Xiaomi Pad Mini
N
new.c.mi.com
01/10/2025
Summary of the review
A New Gateway to Power: My Impressions of the Xiaomi Pad Mini Would you like a summary of the pros and cons mentioned in these specific reviews?
N
notebookcheck.com
03/12/2025
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Pad Mini - Notebookcheck.com Externe Tests
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
27/10/2025
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Pad Mini: moins chère, plus rapide et plus moderne que l'Apple iPad Mini
(Translated)Show original
G
global.techradar.com
30/09/2025
Summary of the review
La Xiaomi Pad Mini es la mejor tablet Android que no puedes comprar: impresiones tras probarla - TechRadar
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • High-end performance powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, making it a 'small beast' for gaming.
  • Compact and lightweight 8.8-inch design that is easy to carry and comfortable for one-handed use.
  • Sharp 3K resolution display with a smooth 165Hz refresh rate.
  • Unique dual USB-C port setup allows for simultaneous charging and accessory use (like headphones or external displays).
  • Excellent battery life, with some tests reaching nearly 20 hours of web surfing.
  • Fast 67W wired charging that can provide a near-full charge in approximately one hour.

What customers don't like about Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Lack of a cellular/LTE variant, which limits its portability for users who do not have constant WiFi access.
  • No fingerprint scanner; users must rely on PIN, pattern, or less secure face unlock.
  • Average IPS LCD panel quality, which lacks the deep blacks and high brightness of OLED screens.
  • Sub-par camera performance, described as only serviceable for basic tasks like scanning documents.
  • Limited global availability, making it difficult to purchase in many Western markets.
  • Awkward button placement, specifically the power button being too close to the corner.

Verdict

The Xiaomi Pad Mini (8GB + 256GB) is a high-performance compact tablet featuring an 8.8-inch 3K IPS LCD display with an ultra-fluid 165Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 3008 x 1880 pixels. It is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ 3nm flagship chipset, utilizing LPDDR5X RAM and UFS 4.1 storage for snappy performance in gaming and multitasking. Notable pros include its premium slim unibody metal design, dual USB-C ports, and a substantial 7500mAh battery that supports 67W fast charging and 18W reverse wired charging. However, it lacks a fingerprint sensor, cellular connectivity, and an OLED panel, with some users noting that the LCD’s peak brightness of 700 nits can struggle against direct outdoor reflections.

Compare Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Pad Mini WiFi (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found