OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£250RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:8 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 51% of tablets
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

8.0

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 55% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £250

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

22%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

8.0

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

7.6

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.5

Audio & Multimedia

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Process node
14 nm
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
353 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
353 points
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 353 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 76.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
â–² Better than 57% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 57.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Pixel density
283 ppi
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 283 ppi which is higher than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 4.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Battery life
8 hours
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
On-device AI
yes
â–² Better than 72% of models
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
342.5 g
Weight
342.5 g
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 342.5 g which is lighter than 83.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
?
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 512
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 512 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports PDAF
    Phase-detection autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 26.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    283 ppi
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 512
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 512 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 512 vs Mali-G51
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.2 GHz
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 26.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    283 ppi
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 62 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    283 ppi
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (283 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 77 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    478 nits
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (478 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    478 nits vs 401 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1200:1
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1200:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,200:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    Phase-detection autofocus
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes on-device AI
    On-device AI
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • 30.1% lighter
    Weight
    342.5 g
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (342.5 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    342.5 g vs 490 g
  • 55 mm narrower
    Width
    120.3 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (120.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    120.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    8 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 51 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    349 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (349 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    349 nits vs 400 nits
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Chemically Strengthened Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 4.81x less popular
    Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 41.7% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,102 points
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1102 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,102 points vs 1,891 points
  • 51.6% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    353 points
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (353 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    353 points vs 729 points
  • 2.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    8 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 51 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    349 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (349 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    349 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Chemically Strengthened Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 8.8% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    6,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
chekyang.com
06/08/2019
Summary of the review
Mi Pad 4 – Part 2 - Musings Would you like more technical details on the LTE bands supported by this specific model or information on how to install G...
R
review-hub.co.uk
22/12/2018
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Review
T
techtablets.com
15/07/2018
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Review - TechTablets
T
techrvw.com
10/02/2020
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Review - Budget Tablet, Great Performance
T
techexplorer.de
20/08/2018
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 – Testbericht / Review
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
25/07/2018
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Testbericht - Die Tablet-Zukunft
(Translated)Show original
C
china-gadgets.de
21/07/2019
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4: 8" Tablet mit LTE & 64 GB Speicher im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
13/09/2018
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (LTE) Tablet - Notebookcheck
(Translated)Show original
P
planetenumerique.com
17/08/2018
Summary of the review
Test tablette Android MI PAD 4 XIAOMI, tout pour être une référence
(Translated)Show original
T
top-for-phone.fr
02/08/2018
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi Mi Pad 4: qualité et célérité pour 150 Euros
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
15/11/2018
Summary of the review
Test Xiaomi Mi Pad 4: une petite bombe à prix mini
(Translated)Show original
P
planetenumerique.com
17/08/2018
Summary of the review
Test tablette Android MI PAD 4 XIAOMI, tout pour être une référence
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.org
18/09/2018
Summary of the review
Review del Tablet Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (LTE)
(Translated)Show original
X
xiaomitoday.it
30/07/2018
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 / Un multitasking da salotto
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
30/07/2018
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Mi Pad 4: piccolo e versatile
(Translated)Show original
M
mifans.nl
16/11/2021
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4: de android tablet voor iedereen - MiFans
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
17/09/2018
Summary of the review
Kort testrapport Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (LTE) Tablet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Excellent battery life with up to 10-12 hours of screen-on time and strong standby performance
  • Smooth gaming and multitasking performance powered by the Snapdragon 660 chipset
  • Compact and portable 8-inch form factor with a 16:10 aspect ratio ideal for reading and media
  • High value for the price compared to other tablets in the same size category
  • Inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack and expandable storage via microSD
  • Reliable LTE connectivity and built-in GPS exclusive to the LTE variant

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of Widevine L1 certification, limiting streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime to SD (480p) resolution
  • Software limitations including no pre-installed Google Play Services on original Chinese ROMs and wonky notifications
  • Slower charging speeds due to the absence of official Quick Charge support
  • No fingerprint sensor, relying instead on face unlock which can be unreliable in low light
  • LTE model missing Band 20, which can affect 4G coverage in certain regions like parts of Europe
  • MIUI interface issues such as oversized UI elements and lack of tablet-specific optimization

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE is a compact 8-inch tablet featuring a 1920x1200 Full HD IPS display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and 283 ppi. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 AIE octa-core processor, paired with 4GB of LPDDR4x RAM and 64GB of eMMC 5.1 internal storage, which is expandable via microSD up to 256GB. Key characteristics include a premium unibody metal design, 4G LTE cellular connectivity with GPS support (exclusive to this variant), and a large 6,000mAh battery that offers up to 12 hours of video playback. Its primary pros are its portable one-handed form factor, smooth gaming performance for its class, and loud stereo speakers. However, notable cons include the lack of a fingerprint sensor (relying solely on face unlock), the absence of Widevine L1 support which limits Netflix streaming to 480p, and a camera that lacks a flash.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 LTE (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found