OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:7.9 inchesChipset:Mediatek MT8176

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 53% of tablets
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 52% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £180

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

22%

5.2

Performance

20%

5.8

Display

16%

7.7

Camera

14%

5.9

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

6.1
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
327 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
327 points
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 327 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 80.2% of tablets.
Chipset
Mediatek MT8176
Chipset
Mediatek MT8176
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This tablet uses the Mediatek MT8176 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 90.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2048×1536
Screen resolution
2048×1536
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2048×1536 which is higher than that of 68.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Pixel density
326 ppi
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 326 ppi which is higher than that of 94.8% of tablets and equal to that of 2.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 13 MP which is higher than that of 74% of tablets and equal to that of 21.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,600 mAh
Battery capacity
6,600 mAh
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,600 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 50.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Battery life
12 hours
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
328 g
Weight
328 g
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 328 g which is lighter than 87.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • 45.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    326 ppi
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (326 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 33.1% lighter
    Weight
    328 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (328 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    328 g vs 490 g
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1500:1
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 105 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    326 ppi
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (326 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 5% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.1 GHz
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 45.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    326 ppi
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (326 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1500:1
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 105 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    326 ppi
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (326 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2048×1536
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2048×1536 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2048×1536 vs 1920×1200
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    450 nits
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • 5 MP higher main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a higher main camera resolution than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet main camera has 8 MP megapixels.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Wider front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • 33.1% lighter
    Weight
    328 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (328 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    328 g vs 490 g
  • 1 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7 mm
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 42.7 mm narrower
    Width
    132.6 mm
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (132.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    132.6 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 2.2 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7.9 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 4.81x less popular
    Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 55.1% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    327 points
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (327 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    327 points vs 729 points
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR GX6250
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR GX6250 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR GX6250 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 2.2 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7.9 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
    HDMI port
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.1
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.1 vs 5.0
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tabletpccomparison.net
21/02/2020
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 Review (2021) - Tablet PC Comparison
E
en.techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 review - cheap iPad alternative?
R
review-hub.co.uk
23/05/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 (7.9″ Tablet) Review
T
techadvisor.com
19/05/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 review
A
androidpolice.com
12/06/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 review: For those who dream of owning an iPad mini but want it to run Android
M
mynexttablet.com
08/08/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 Review: An almost perfect iPad Mini clone?
H
hifitest.de
13/04/2023
Summary of the review
Test - technische Daten Tablets - Xiaomi Mi Pad 3
(Translated)Show original
T
techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 Testbericht - Günstige iPad Alternative?
(Translated)Show original
H
heise.de
18/08/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3: iPad-Mini-Konkurrent für 200 Euro im Test
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Test du Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 - Alternative iPad bon marché?
(Translated)Show original
P
planetenumerique.com
15/04/2017
Summary of the review
Test tablette XIAOMI MI PAD 3, L'iPad mini Chinois version Android
(Translated)Show original
T
top-for-phone.fr
25/05/2017
Summary of the review
Test de la Xiaomi MiPad 3: une tablette sans surprise
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
22/06/2017
Summary of the review
Test: Xiaomi Mi Pad 3, la petite tablette qui fait de l’ombre à l’iPad mini
(Translated)Show original
E
es.techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Revisión de Xiaomi Mi Pad 3: ¿alternativa barata de iPad? Would you like a comparison of the technical specifications between this model and the newer...
(Translated)Show original
G
gizlogic.com
22/04/2017
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3, análisis en profundidad de esta nueva tablet
(Translated)Show original
E
elconfidencial.com
29/05/2017
Summary of the review
Probamos el 'iPad barato' de Xiaomi: por qué el Mi Pad 3 es la mejor tableta china El Confidencial
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
25/10/2026
Summary of the review
Scheda tecnica Xiaomi Mi Pad 3
(Translated)Show original
I
it.techreviewer.de
04/05/2017
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 - techreviewer.it
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
15/05/2017
Summary of the review
Recensione Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 - Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
E
en.techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 review - cheap iPad alternative? (Note: This is the Dutch-language domain equivalent providing a comprehensive test report) Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.techreviewer.de
07/10/2024
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 review - goedkoop iPad-alternatief?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Premium all-metal unibody construction with excellent build quality
  • High-resolution 7.9-inch IPS display (2048 x 1536) that is sharp and color-vivid
  • Lightweight and highly portable design, similar to an iPad Mini
  • Good overall performance for daily tasks and multitasking with 4GB of RAM
  • Solid battery life for media consumption, typically reaching 8-10 hours of screen-on time
  • Includes a 3.5mm headphone jack with clean and loud audio output

What we don't like about Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Lack of a microSD card slot for expandable storage
  • Mediocre gaming performance with occasional lag and overheating in intensive 3D titles
  • Camera quality is weak with poor detail and high noise in low light
  • Rear-firing speaker placement can lead to sound being muffled when held in landscape mode
  • Software limitations, including high standby battery drain and lack of a global ROM for some versions
  • Maximum screen brightness is insufficient for comfortable use in direct sunlight
  • No GPS module or SIM slot, limiting its utility as a mobile navigation device

Verdict

The Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi is a compact 7.9-inch tablet featuring a high-resolution IPS LCD (2048 x 1536) with a 326 ppi density and a premium all-metal unibody design. It is powered by a MediaTek MT8176 hexa-core processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, delivering smooth multitasking and a fluid user experience on MIUI 8.2 (Android 7.0). Key pros include its sharp 'Retina class' display, excellent build quality, and a large 6,600 mAh battery that provides reliable life for media consumption. However, notable cons include the lack of a microSD card slot for storage expansion, the absence of a global ROM (often limited to Chinese/English), and higher-than-average standby battery drain.

Compare Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Xiaomi Mi Pad 3 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found