OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:2 GBScreen size:5 inchesChipset:?

Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of tablets
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

3.8

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

4.0

Connectivity

8%

4.7

Software & Features

5%

5.8

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 97% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
  • vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular
vtech-innotab-2-2gb-storage-no-cellular

Best prices

    N/A~ £90

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

5.5

Display

16%

3.8

Camera

14%

3.5

Battery

12%

4.0

Connectivity

8%

4.7

Software & Features

5%

5.8

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

4.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

4.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
65 nm
Process node
65 nm
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 65 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 99.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 0.3% of tablets.
Internal storage
2 GB
Internal storage
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the storage of 99.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
Screen resolution
480×272
Screen resolution
480×272
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 480×272 which is lower than that of 99.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
110 ppi
Pixel density
110 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 110 ppi which is lower than that of 99.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Plastic
Display glass type
Plastic
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
This tablet uses Plastic display glass which is weaker than that on 97.7% of tablets and equal to that on 2.3% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Main camera megapixels
1.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than that of 99.2% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
9 W
Charging speed
9 W
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 9 W which is slower than in 94.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.8% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
This tablet does not support Wi-Fi connectivity. 99.8% of tablets include Wi-Fi.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary
Operating system
Proprietary
â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
This tablet uses the Proprietary operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 99.8%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
App tracking protection
yes
â–² Better than 72% of models
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
372 g
Weight
372 g
â–² Better than 78% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 372 g which is lighter than 78% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • 24.1% lighter
    Weight
    372 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (372 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    372 g vs 490 g
  • Includes app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£90 vs £260).
    £90 vs £260
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£90 vs £260).
    £90 vs £260
  • Includes app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • 24.1% lighter
    Weight
    372 g
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (372 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    372 g vs 490 g
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 6.7 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    1.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    480×272
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (480×272 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    480×272 vs 1920×1200
  • 80% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (0.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    0.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Proprietary vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Proprietary vs Android
  • 50.9% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    110 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (110 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    110 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 13.7% worse value for money
    Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.24 vs 7.1).
    6.24 vs 7.1
  • 4.81x less popular
    Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 80% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (0.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    0.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4.64x larger process node
    Process node
    65 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (65 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    65 nm vs 14 nm
  • 5 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (1 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    1 vs 6
  • 96.9% less storage
    Internal storage
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (2 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    2 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 72.3% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    180 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (180 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    180 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    480×272
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (480×272 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    480×272 vs 1920×1200
  • 50.9% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    110 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (110 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    110 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 5.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    5 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Plastic
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Plastic vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 111 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    110 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (110 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    110 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6.7 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    1.3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    272 x 15 fps
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (272x15 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    272x15 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 50% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    9 W
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (9 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    9 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet does not have Wi-Fi connectivity, the average tablet does. 99.8% of tablets feature Wi-Fi.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Proprietary
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Proprietary vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Proprietary vs Android
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet does not support voice commands, the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets include voice command support.
  • No widgets
    Widgets support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 17 mm thicker
    Thickness
    25 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (25 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    25 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    2012 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
the-gadgeteer.com
09/12/2012
Summary of the review
V-Tech InnoTab Tablet for children review - The Gadgeteer
M
mummyslittlestars.com
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
Innotab 2 by Vtech - Review - Mummy's Little Stars
M
mylifeunexpected.co.uk
28/10/2012
Summary of the review
The Innotab 2 Review - Life Unexpected
O
ourkidsmom.com
18/09/2012
Summary of the review
vTech Innotab 2 Learning App Tablet For Kids Review
W
whatsgoodtodo.com
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
VTech Innotab 2 Review - What's Good To Do Would you like to see a comparison of the InnoTab 2's storage capabilities against the newer InnoTab 2S?
B
babybudgeting.co.uk
17/09/2012
Summary of the review
Review: InnoTab 2 by Vtech – Simply explained!
M
mummyslittlestars.com
26/11/2012
Summary of the review
Vtech's InnoTab 2 v Leapfrog's LeapPad 2 - Mummy's Little Stars
S
stressedrach.co.uk
19/07/2013
Summary of the review
Vtech InnoTab 2 - Stressed Rach
G
galaxus.ch
01/03/2026
Summary of the review
Bewertungen für VTech 2 in 1 Tablet (Deutsch, 4 - Galaxus Amazon.de
(Translated)Show original
D
dadslife.de
10/01/2026
Summary of the review
Bester Lerncomputer für Kinder: Unsere Favoriten 2026 im Test
(Translated)Show original
P
papacube.com
15/11/2012
Summary of the review
Test de la STORIO 2 de Vtech (INNOTAB 2)
(Translated)Show original
F
familledegeeks.fr
27/09/2011
Summary of the review
Parole de Flo : la Storio de VTech - Famille de Geeks
(Translated)Show original
W
webzine.souris-grise.fr
01/12/2012
Summary of the review
Vtech Storio 2 : vraiment adaptée aux jeunes enfants
(Translated)Show original
S
souris-grise.fr
01/12/2012
Summary of the review
Vtech Storio 2 : vraiment adaptée aux jeunes enfants
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB)

  • Extremely durable and robust build quality, able to withstand drops by toddlers
  • Rotating 180-degree camera is a favorite feature for children to take selfies and videos
  • Excellent educational content including e-books, logic games, and creative art tools
  • Expandable storage up to 32GB via SD card for movies and music
  • Safe, closed environment with no unsupervised internet access
  • Ergonomic design with buttons and stylus sized well for small hands

What we don't like about Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB)

  • High battery consumption, often requiring 4 new AA batteries daily with heavy use
  • Slow processor leads to long loading times between apps, sometimes frustrating children
  • Resistive touch screen can be unresponsive or requires significant pressure
  • Additional costs for cartridges and downloadable apps can be expensive
  • Screen quality is relatively low resolution and difficult to see in direct sunlight
  • AC adapter and rechargeable battery packs are sold separately

Verdict

The VTech InnoTab 2 is a durable 5-inch color touchscreen learning tablet designed for children aged 3 to 9, featuring 2GB of onboard storage that is expandable up to 32GB via an SD card slot. This non-cellular model includes a 180° rotating 1.3MP camera for photos and videos, a built-in microphone, and a tilt sensor for motion-controlled gameplay. Its primary strengths lie in its rugged, child-friendly design, 4-user profile personalization, and a wide library of educational cartridges and downloadable apps that teach reading, logic, and creativity. However, notable drawbacks include its reliance on four AA batteries which can drain quickly, the lack of a built-in camera flash, and a relatively slow processing speed that may lead to long loading times for applications.

Compare Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vtech Innotab 2 Storage No Cellular (2GB) and other tablets

No results found