OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£750RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:12.2 inchesChipset:Exynos 5420

Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 56% of tablets
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.5

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.3

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 55% of tablets
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 253 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 68% of tablets
  • samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-note-pro-12-2-3gb-64gb-wifi

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
3GB + 64GB3GB + 32GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

22%

5.7

Performance

20%

5.9

Display

16%

6.5

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software & Features

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.3

Audio & Multimedia

6.3
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 253 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 7.1 points, which is lower than 70% of Tablets.
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

6.6

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
3 GB
RAM capacity
3 GB
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 3 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 8.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Exynos 5420
Chipset
Exynos 5420
â–² Better than 77% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 76.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
Screen resolution
2560×1600
â–² Better than 78% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
247 ppi
Pixel density
247 ppi
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 247 ppi which is higher than that of 67% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
â–² Better than 80% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 3 display glass which is stronger than that on 80.1% of tablets and equal to that on 11.2% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
9,500 mAh
Battery capacity
9,500 mAh
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 9,500 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 84.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
Battery life
13 hours
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
internet usage
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
750 g
Weight
750 g
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 750 g which is heavier than 91.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2.8 ms
Pen latency
2.8 ms
â–² Better than 77% of models
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2.8 ms, which is lower than that of 77% of tablets and equal to that of 11.5% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
?
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 5420
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 5,420 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.1 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.2 inches
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9500 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 5420
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 5,420 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 2.1 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    12.2 inches
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.2 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • More durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 10.3% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    247 ppi
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (247 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    247 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 26 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    247 ppi
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (247 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    247 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    13 hours
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    internet usage
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,500 mAh
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9500 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,500 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 6.2 ms lower pen latency
    Pen latency
    2.8 ms
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2.8 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2.8 ms vs 9 ms
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T628 MP6
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T628 MP6 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T628 MP6 vs Mali-G51
  • 53.1% heavier
    Weight
    750 g
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (750 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    750 g vs 490 g
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    593:1
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (593:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    593:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 2.88x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£750 vs £260).
    £750 vs £260
  • 9.9% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.46 vs 7.1).
    6.46 vs 7.1
  • 2.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.78 vs 8.000).
    7.78 vs 8
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T628 MP6
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T628 MP6 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T628 MP6 vs Mali-G51
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 933 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    933 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (933 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 1 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    3 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 18% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    533 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (533 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    533 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 5% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.9 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    593:1
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (593:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    593:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 53.1% heavier
    Weight
    750 g
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (750 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    750 g vs 490 g
  • 120.3 mm wider
    Width
    295.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (295.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    295.6 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2014
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    February 2014
    2014 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techradar.com
05/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 review
C
cnet.com
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro review: Not (quite) a workstation replacement
T
t3.com
21/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 review
T
time.com
21/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review: The Samsung Galaxy Note Pro is an Oversized Tablet with One Missed Opportunity Would you like more specific technical benchmarks or comparison...
R
reviewed.com
19/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2'' Tablet Review
L
laptopmag.com
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Review
M
mobiletechreview.com
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Review
D
digitaltrends.com
23/08/2019
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Review
C
computerworld.com
07/03/2014
Summary of the review
Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 deep-dive review: Almost a laptop replacement
P
pcmag.com
21/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy NotePRO Review
E
editorial.recombu.com
18/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Review: In Depth
W
wired.com
14/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro review
T
trustedreviews.com
06/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Review
P
phonearena.com
12/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy NotePRO 12.2 Review
C
computerwoche.de
30/04/2014
Summary of the review
Video-Test: Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
17/07/2014
Summary of the review
Android-Tablet: Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 im Test
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
17/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
06/03/2014
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 Tablet
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
15/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy NotePro 12.2 - Test
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
Date non spécifiée
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 - Archive CNET France
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
20/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 - Premières impressions
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
12/12/2019
Summary of the review
Test de la Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, la tablette hors-norme est là
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/03/2014
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, la grande tablette à stylet
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
21/02/2014
Summary of the review
Test de la Samsung Galaxy Note PRO 12.2
(Translated)Show original
L
lesandroides.net
29/04/2018
Summary of the review
Test : Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, haut de gamme et grand format
(Translated)Show original
T
tuexperto.com
12/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2, lo hemos probado
(Translated)Show original
T
teknofilo.com
08/08/2014
Summary of the review
Análisis del Samsung Galaxy NotePRO 12.2
(Translated)Show original
Z
zonamovilidad.es
22/10/2014
Summary of the review
Prueba Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2. Familia Pro series
(Translated)Show original
Z
zonamovilidad.es
22/10/2014
Summary of the review
Prueba Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2. Familia Pro series - Zona Movilidad
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
19/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note PRO 12.2, la recensione (foto e video)
(Translated)Show original
B
batista70phone.com
01/07/2014
Summary of the review
Video recensione Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 - Batista70
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
31/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro Review: zwaargewicht met enorm scherm(www.techzine.nl) | February 21, 2014 | Review: Samsung Galaxy NotePRO 12.2 - Techzine.nl
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
14/02/2014
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy NotePRO 12.2 | FWD
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
19/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung NotePro 12,2" Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
25/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review: Testpanel: Eindbeoordeling van de Samsung Galaxy NotePro 12.2
(Translated)Show original
G
gadgetgear.nl
25/02/2014
Summary of the review
Test: Galaxy NotePRO 12.2 (SM-P900) - GadgetGear.nl
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
11/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review Samsung Galaxy NotePRO 12.2: Groot maar flexibel
(Translated)Show original
N
nl.hardware.info
25/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy NotePro 12.2" review: nieuw gebruiksmodel?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 253 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 101 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB)

  • Large, high-resolution 12.2-inch display that is excellent for multitasking and media consumption.
  • Exceptional S Pen functionality with a large canvas that feels natural for drawing and note-taking.
  • Effective multitasking capabilities with Multi Window mode allowing up to four apps to run simultaneously.
  • Strong battery life that reliably lasts through a full workday for many users.
  • Premium features like MicroSD expansion and loud stereo speakers.
  • Thin and relatively lightweight design considering the massive screen size.

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB)

  • Software optimization issues (TouchWiz) lead to occasional stuttering and lag, even with high-end hardware.
  • High initial price point compared to many other tablet and laptop alternatives.
  • Unwieldy size for one-handed use or portability during travel.
  • Reflective screen and PenTile subpixel structure can occasionally affect outdoor visibility and fine detail sharpness.
  • Excessive pre-installed 'bloatware' that consumes significant internal storage.
  • Flimsy feel of the plastic faux-leather chassis, which some users felt did not match the 'Pro' branding.

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2 WiFi (64GB) is a productivity-focused tablet featuring a large 12.2-inch WQXGA (2560 x 1600) Super Clear LCD display and an integrated S Pen with Wacom technology. Under the hood, the WiFi-only model is powered by a Samsung Exynos 5 Octa processor (1.9 GHz quad-core and 1.3 GHz quad-core), 3GB of RAM, and 64GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSDXC slot up to 64GB. Key pros include its expansive screen for enhanced multitasking (capable of running four apps simultaneously), excellent battery life from a 9,500 mAh cell, and a comprehensive suite of pre-loaded office software. However, users have noted that its significant weight (approx. 750g) and large dimensions make it difficult to hold for long periods, and the plastic build quality can feel less premium compared to metal-clad competitors.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12 2 WiFi (3GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found