OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£510RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.3 inchesChipset:?

reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 42 expert and video reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

35%

5.7

Technical score

30%

5.7

List score

25%

8.3

Reviews score

10%

8.9

Sentiment score

▼Worse than 62% of tablets
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

▼Worse than 83%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

4.0

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

8.0

Design

3%

2.8

Audio

▼Worse than 64%
8.3

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

9.1

Popularity

Grades by review (42)
35 reviews: 20 with a printed score, 15 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 80%
5.7

List score

List score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 136 lists (1%)
★Better than 93%
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
  • remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
remarkable-paper-pro-move-2gb-64gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)

Based on 35 · 7

Reviewers love the compact, light design and writing feel, but find the small screen cramped for reading and the device expensive.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)

Based on 199 owners sharing their experience in online comments

51%positive24%mixed25%negative

Owners value the natural writing feel and portable note-taking, while price, battery life and reading limits frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • PDFs show only a small part of the page at a time in landscape, and EPUB books need font tweaks and lose their hyperlinks.22
  • Owners report about a day with medium use, and Wi-Fi sync drains it, so turning Wi-Fi off or using airplane mode helps.21
  • Owners feel the device costs more than its features justify, with some saying it is overpriced for what it offers.19
  • Menus feel slow and the screen ghosts or lags, especially when scrolling, reading EPUBs, writing in colour and powering on.10
  • Owners find the screen dim and greyish, with a weak backlight that struggles in low light, and colour looks dull.10
  • Writing feels scratchy to some, with broken lines, pen tap issues and a pen that feels worse than on the rM2.10
  • Owners miss a calendar, dictionary, browser, e-reader apps and third-party software, plus custom templates and a Bluetooth keyboard.10
  • Owners must swipe rather than tap to turn pages, and text can be cut off at the sides until margins are changed.10
  • Owners find it thick, with an uncomfortable edge and no steady spot for the palm, and it feels awkward for left-handed writers.7
  • The writing area is narrow, so note taking feels cramped, and some owners find it too small for comfortable handwriting.6

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

4.0

Camera

14%

5.1

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software

5%

8.0

Design

3%

2.8

Audio

5.7
Reviews score
8.3
List score
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
Screen resolution
1696×954
This tablet has a 1696×954 screen, which is less sharp than 64.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
E-Ink
This tablet uses a E-Ink display type. 99.8% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
229 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 229 ppi, which is higher than 64.3% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
N/A
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
2,334 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 2,334 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 99.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
15 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 15 W, which is slower than 52.1% of tablets and equal to 6.3% of tablets.
Battery life
20 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 20 hours, which is longer than that of 95.8% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
?
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
404 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 404 g, which is lighter than 74.3% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
12 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 12 ms, which is higher than that of 65% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
0
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 0, which is fewer than 99.8% of tablets and equal to 0.2% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
0
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 0 speakers, which is fewer than in 99.9% of tablets and equal to the number in 0.1% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 80% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    9.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    35 reviews: 20 with a printed score, 15 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 17.6% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (404 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    404 g vs 490 g
  • 18.6% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 80% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    9.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (42)
    35 reviews: 20 with a printed score, 15 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.3 vs 7.0
  • 18.7% higher sentiment score
    8.9 vs 7.5
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 0.2 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.6% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (229 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    229 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 10 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (20 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    20 hours vs 10 hours
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5).
    5.1 vs 5
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Stylus included
    This tablet includes a stylus, while the average tablet does not. 17.2% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, while the average tablet is not. 40% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 17.6% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (404 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    404 g vs 490 g
  • 1.5 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    6.5 mm vs 8 mm
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.5% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 27.8% lower list score
    List score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 136 lists (1%)
    5.7 vs 7.9
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (E-Ink vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    E-Ink vs IPS LCD
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 64.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,334 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,334 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • 27.8% lower list score
    List score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 136 lists (1%)
    5.7 vs 7.9
  • 96.2% more expensive
    reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£510 vs £260).
    £510 vs £260
  • 7.4% worse value for money
    reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.03 vs 7.6).
    7.03 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 15% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 35.6% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (9.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    9.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (E-Ink vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    E-Ink vs IPS LCD
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1696×954 vs 1920×1200).
    1,696×954 vs 1,920×1,200
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • Non-CMOS image sensor
    This tablet does not have a CMOS sensor, while the average tablet does. 99.4% of tablets have a CMOS sensor.
  • 64.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (2,334 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    2,334 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 16.7% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (15 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    15 W vs 18 W
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    reMarkable Paper Pro Move
    the average tablet
    reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No voice commands
    This tablet does not support voice commands, while the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets offer this.
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.6% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 3 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (12 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    12 ms vs 9 ms
  • 21.3 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (196.6 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    196.6 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No headphone jack
    This tablet does not include a 3.5 mm headphone jack, while the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 2 fewer speakers
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (0 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    0 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

5.0
Vladimir Kostek
≈ estimated
30/12/2025
Long-term test · 3 months of daily use
Verdict
reMarkable Paper Pro Move is good for the right person, but the reviewer is returning it over reading and software shortcomings.
9.0
The Spark!
≈ estimated
11/09/2025
First impressions · unboxing and setup
Verdict
reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a terrific little device, essentially a cut-down Paper Pro, and recommended for now.
Brand video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

3.0
leafandcore.com
≈ estimated
15/10/2025
Hands-on test · Returned after use
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move has a strong writing feel, but a device failure during testing outweighs it.
9.0
wallpaper.com
≈ estimated
03/09/2025
Early trial · Portable e-ink notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move packs the Paper Pro's color screen and two-week battery into a pocketable 7.3-inch body that fits in one hand.
10
techradar.com
✓ explicit
03/09/2025
Hands-on review · Writing tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a focused, pocket-sized notebook with an excellent pen feel, but it has few apps and features and is not an e-reader.
8.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
03/09/2025
Hands-on review · Digital notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a slim, colorful digital notebook for to-do lists and quick notes, but it is too limited for long-form writing.
9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
03/09/2025
Two-week review · Pocket notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is the best reMarkable yet, suiting people who take notes all day, though it is pricey and has shorter battery life.
8.0
6monthslater.net
≈ estimated
31/10/2026
Six-month review · Pocket notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move suits people who need a notebook on the move, while the larger Paper Pro remains better for everyday desk use.
9.0
joshualowcock.com
≈ estimated
03/09/2025
First look · Dual-device use
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move fits a jacket pocket and suits people who want a portable notebook to pair with a larger reMarkable.
8.0
lifehacker.com
✓ explicit
23/04/2026
Hands-on review · E-ink notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a smaller Paper Pro with a great writing feel, but dim light, slow color and a high price hold it back.
9.0
cnn.com
≈ estimated
03/09/2025
Tested review · Color e-ink
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a slim, pocket-sized notebook with color and a reading light, though its price is high and its battery cannot be replaced.
7.0
itpro.com
✓ explicit
08/09/2025
Hands-on test · E-ink tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move has the most paper-like feel of any e-ink device tested and fits in a jacket pocket, though it can freeze and feel cramped.
8.0
au.lifehacker.com
✓ explicit
04/09/2025
Hands-on review · Pocket e-ink notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a pocket-sized Paper Pro with the same great writing feel, held back by a dim front light and weak organization tools.
9.0
pcworld.com
✓ explicit
29/10/2025
Hands-on review · Compact e-ink tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a compact e-ink tablet that feels like paper and suits frequent writers, though its high price and shaky mixed-language conversion hold it back.
9.0
bgr.com
≈ estimated
29/10/2025
Hands-on review · Note-taking tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a light, paper-like note-taker that suits people who take notes all day, though its wide bezels and slow erasing are minor drawbacks.
9.0
9to5mac.com
≈ estimated
21/09/2025
Hands-on review · Portable e-ink notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move keeps the Paper Pro's writing and battery strengths in a smaller body, so it suits people who want focused, portable note-taking.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
13/10/2025
Hands-on review · Portable e-ink tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a narrow, nearly pocketable tablet that feels great to write on, but limited software and reading keep it niche.
9.7
mashable.com
✓ explicit
03/09/2025
Two-week hands-on test · Pocket notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a pocket-sized, reporter's-notebook shaped tablet that writes well, but battery life and PDF reading fall short.
8.0
nymag.com
≈ estimated
20/01/2026
Months of use · Digital notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a paper-feeling digital notebook that suits note-takers who want a distraction-free space, but it is a limited e-reader.
9.0
pcwelt.de
✓ explicit
27/10/2025
Hands-on test · E-ink tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a compact e-ink notebook with a near-paper pen feel and a battery that lasts about two weeks, best for heavy writers.
6.0
allesebook.de
≈ estimated
17/09/2025
Hands-on test · Color notebook
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a light, well-built color notebook, but its narrow screen feels cramped for writing and it is pricey for what it does.
8.1
appgefahren.de
✓ explicit
05/11/2025
Hands-on test · Color e-ink tablet
Verdict
The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is a small writing tablet with a fast, pleasant pen feel, but its bluish blacks and weak backlight limit it.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)

  • Extreme portability; fits in small bags and jacket pockets due to 7.3-inch form factor
  • Near-zero writing latency (approx. 10-14ms) providing a fluid pen-to-screen experience
  • Tactile, paper-like writing feel with improved friction compared to standard tablets
  • Inclusion of a subtle front-light for reading and writing in low-light environments
  • Distraction-free interface with no apps, notifications, or web browsing to interrupt focus
  • Automatic magnetic charging for the new active Marker Plus stylus

What customers don't like about reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB)

  • High price point ($449+) for a single-purpose device with limited features
  • Muted and desaturated color display that lacks the vibrancy of LCD/OLED screens
  • Sluggish navigation and slow screen refresh rates, particularly when using colors
  • Poor PDF and EPUB handling; formatting can be awkward on the smaller 9:16 screen
  • Noticeable ghosting and artifacts that sometimes require manual screen refreshes
  • Mandatory subscription (reMarkable Connect) to unlock features like cloud sync and handwriting-to-text
  • Fragile build quality reported by some users, including screen and pen charging issues

Verdict

The reMarkable Paper Pro Move is an ultra-portable 7.3-inch digital notebook designed for distraction-free productivity on the go. It features a Canvas Color display based on E Ink Gallery 3 technology with a resolution of 1696 x 954 (264 PPI), supporting a nine-colour palette for sketching and annotating. Under the hood, it is powered by a 1.7 GHz dual-core Cortex-A55 processor and 2GB of RAM, providing 64GB of internal storage and a 2,334 mAh battery that offers up to two weeks of life. Key advantages include its pocketable design, adjustable front light for low-light use, and a highly textured glass surface that provides a realistic pen-on-paper writing feel with low 12ms latency. However, it is noted for a premium price point, limited file format support (EPUB and PDF only), and occasional lag when refreshing coloured ink or loading large documents.

Compare reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of reMarkable Paper Pro Move (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found