OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£420RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1

Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 7 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

35%

6.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

6.8

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 51% of tablets
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

22%

7.7

Performance

20%

7.6

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software

5%

6.0

Design

3%

6.7

Audio

â–²Better than 64%
6.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models

6.8

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.7

Average grade

20%

7.3

Popularity

Grades by review (7)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 59%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £420
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB)

Based on 7

Reviewers like the controller, battery life and cloud gaming, but most are unhappy with the display and software.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

22%

7.7

Performance

20%

7.6

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.7

Software

5%

6.0

Design

3%

6.7

Audio

6.8
Reviews score
6.8
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

7.4
RAM capacity
6 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 6 GB of RAM, which is more than 65% of tablets and equal to 7.1% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process, which is smaller than 88.1% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 128 GB of internal storage, which is more than 56.2% of tablets and equal to 20% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
1,587 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 1,587 points in single-core tests, which is higher than 77.7% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1, which is more advanced than 84.6% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2400×1080
This tablet has a 2400×1080 screen, which is sharper than 67.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 144 Hz screen, which is smoother than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 7.4% of tablets.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
This tablet uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 92.5% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
387 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 387 ppi, which is higher than 99.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 6
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 6, which is more durable than 99.6% of tablets and the same as 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,000 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 70% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 45 W, which is faster than 83.8% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
10.6 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10.6 hours, which is longer than that of 60.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
?
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
This tablet does not support direct OS updates. 79.8% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
?
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
264 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 264 g, which is lighter than 98.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
yes
This tablet supports aptX Adaptive. 93.2% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • 50% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 75.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (387 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    387 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon G3X Gen 1 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 50% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR5 vs LPDDR3
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.03x higher multi-core score
    This tablet has a higher multi-core score than the average tablet (3,834 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    3,834 points vs 1,891 points
  • 2.18x higher single-core score
    This tablet has a higher single-core score than the average tablet (1,587 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    1,587 points vs 729 points
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs Mali-G51).
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs Mali-G51
  • 44 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (48 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    48 vs 4
  • 2 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 71.8% more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 4 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    January 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 2.4x faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Better display type
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • 75.1% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (387 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    387 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 6 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2400×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    2,400×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • Supports HDR10
    This tablet supports HDR10, while the average tablet does not. 21.7% of tablets support HDR10.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 2.5x faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 0.6 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (10.6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    10.6 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.3% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5).
    5.2 vs 5
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    via USB-C video-out adapter
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • 46.1% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (264 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    264 g vs 490 g
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports aptX Adaptive
    This tablet supports aptX Adaptive, while the average tablet does not. 6.8% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports aptX Low Latency
    This tablet supports aptX Low Latency, the average tablet does not. 2.6% of tablets support aptX Low Latency.
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • 61.5% more expensive
    Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£420 vs £260).
    £420 vs £260
  • 2.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models

    6.8

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.7

    Average grade

    20%

    7.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (7)
    7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    6.8 vs 7.0
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 10 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (390 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    390 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 24.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No direct OS updates
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, while the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 3 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    11 mm vs 8 mm
  • 84.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (260 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    260 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 60 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (260 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    260 mm vs 200 mm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
13/04/2023
Hands-on review · Android gaming handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge is a capable Android handheld for game streaming and emulation, lasting longer than the Steam Deck but with a clunky Android interface.
7.0
press-start.com.au
≈ estimated
04/12/2023
Hands-on review · Android gaming handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge is a good niche handheld for cloud and Android gaming, but a modern Android phone can do much of the same.
9.0
cnn.com
≈ estimated
05/01/2023
Hands-on preview · Gaming handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge is an impressive Android gaming handheld with a fast 144Hz screen and optional 5G, but its price suits only dedicated mobile gamers.
5.0
allround-pc.com
✓ explicit
28/10/2023
Hands-on test · Cloud gaming handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge suits cloud and Android gaming, but its constant fan, wide 20:9 screen and dated Android 12 make it less convincing than established handhelds.
7.0
frandroid.com
✓ explicit
20/09/2023
Hands-on review · Android handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge is a 144 Hz Android handheld that doesn't fully suit mobile or cloud play, and its speakers and lack of a game launcher disappoint.
8.6
profesionalreview.com
✓ explicit
04/10/2023
Hands-on review · Gaming tablet
Verdict
The Razer Edge is a gaming tablet with a 144Hz screen and fan cooling, strong for Android and cloud games, but it lacks fingerprint unlock and mobile data.
8.0
elchapuzasinformatico.com
≈ estimated
21/09/2023
Hands-on review · Cloud gaming handheld
Verdict
The Razer Edge is a 6.8-inch Android tablet with a 144Hz screen, built for cloud gaming and long sessions, though its price feels high.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB)

  • Stunning 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a smooth 144Hz refresh rate
  • Excellent performance for high-end Android gaming and console emulation (up to PS2/GameCube)
  • Premium build quality with a comfortable, ergonomic feel during long sessions
  • Versatile design allows it to be used as a standalone mini-tablet for reading or media
  • Active cooling system effectively manages thermals during intensive gameplay
  • Low latency and strong network performance for cloud gaming via Wi-Fi 6E

What customers don't like about Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB)

  • Unconventional 20:9 aspect ratio leads to significant black bars (pillar-boxing) in most games
  • High standby battery drain when the controller is left attached to the tablet
  • Aggressively rounded screen corners can cut off critical UI elements in some apps
  • Android 12 software feels clunky and unoptimized for a dedicated handheld console
  • The included Kishi V2 Pro controller feels less premium than dedicated console controllers
  • Internal cooling fan can become noticeably loud during heavy processing tasks
  • Lack of essential features like a built-in kickstand or biometric (fingerprint) unlock

Verdict

The Razer Edge 2023 (Wi-Fi) is a specialized Android gaming handheld featuring a 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a 144Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 2400 x 1080. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 chipset with active fan cooling, paired with 6GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128GB of UFS 3.1 internal storage, which is expandable up to 2TB via microSD. Key characteristics include its modular design bundled with a Razer Kishi V2 Pro controller, a 5,000 mAh battery, and a 5MP front-facing camera. Its main pros are the vibrant, high-refresh OLED screen, excellent performance for native Android gaming and emulation, and the inclusion of high-quality tactile controls with haptic feedback. However, notable cons include a non-standard 20:9 aspect ratio that causes letterboxing in many games, noticeable fan noise under load, and a price point that rivals more powerful dedicated handhelds or high-end smartphones.

Compare Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Razer Edge Pro 2023 (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found