OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Oneplus Pad 3 China Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:11.61 inchesChipset:MediaTek Dimensity 8350

Oneplus Pad 3 China Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

8.5/10

Overall score

Score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

90%

8.5

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 92% of tablets
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

â–²Better than 86%
8.5

Technical score

Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

7.7

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.7

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

7.7

Audio & Multimedia

★Better than 91%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £620
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Oneplus Pad 3 China

Technical score
Technical score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Score components:

22%

9.6

Performance

20%

8.7

Display

16%

8.5

Camera

14%

7.7

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.7

Software & Features

5%

6.7

Design

3%

7.7

Audio & Multimedia

8.5
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Oneplus Pad 3 China has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 86% of models
Score components:

70%

8.5

Overall score

30%

7.2

Price

8.1
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
4 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 88.2% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
2,994 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 2,994 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 97.5% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Dimensity 8350
This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 83.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2800×2000
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2800×2000 which is higher than that of 95.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
144 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 144 Hz which is higher than in 91.2% of tablets and equal to that in 7.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
296 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 296 ppi which is higher than that of 91.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
12,140 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 12,140 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 98.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
80 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 80 W which is faster than in 98.3% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.6% of tablets.
Battery life
8.88 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.88 hours, which is shorter than that of 69.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP41
This tablet has an IP rating of IP41 which is higher than that of 84.7% of tablets.
Weight
675 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 675 g which is heavier than 86.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
2 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 2 ms, which is lower than that of 88.9% of tablets and equal to that of 11.1% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Oneplus Pad 3 China vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 8,350 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2800×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2800×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 830 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 830 vs Mali-G51
  • 5.32x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (10059 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,059 points vs 1,891 points
  • 4.44x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (80 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    80 W vs 18 W
  • 67.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.35 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 84.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12140 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 14.5% better value for money
    Oneplus Pad 3 China has better value for money than the average tablet (8.13 vs 7.1).
    8.13 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    MediaTek Dimensity 8,350 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 830 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 830 vs Mali-G51
  • 5.32x higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (10059 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    10,059 points vs 1,891 points
  • 67.5% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.35 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4.11x higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (2994 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    2,994 points vs 729 points
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 5.15x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    76.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR5X vs LPDDR3
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 71.4% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (4 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    4 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2,400 MHz faster RAM speed
    This tablet has a higher RAM speed than the average tablet (4266 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    4,266 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes neural engine
    This tablet includes a neural engine, the average tablet does not. 25.7% of tablets include a neural engine.
  • 2.4x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    144 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2800×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2800×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 499 nits higher peak brightness
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (900 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    900 nits vs 401 nits
  • 200 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 32.1% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (296 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    296 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1.51 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.61 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Wider color gamut
    This tablet supports a wider color gamut than the average tablet (DCI-P3 vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    98% DCI-P3 coverage reported.
    DCI-P3 vs sRGB
  • 75 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (296 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    296 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports HDR10+ support
    This tablet supports HDR10+, the average tablet does not. 8% of tablets include HDR10+ support.
  • 4.5x higher touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a higher touch sampling rate than the average tablet (540 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    540 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Better main-camera video
    This tablet supports better main-camera video recording than the average tablet (2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    2160x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4.44x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (80 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    80 W vs 18 W
  • 84.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (12140 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    12,140 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • More Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports more Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz/5GHz/6GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.4 vs 5.0
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP41 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP41 vs not rated
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • 1.7 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.3 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 7 ms lower pen latency
    This tablet has lower pen latency than the average tablet (2 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    2 ms vs 9 ms
  • 5 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2024 vs 2019).
    December 2024
    2024 vs 2019
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Supports Bluetooth LE Audio
    This tablet supports Bluetooth LE Audio, the average tablet does not. 11.5% of tablets support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • 37.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (675 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    675 g vs 490 g
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 1.12 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8.88 hours vs 10 hours
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Oneplus Pad 3 China is more expensive than the average tablet (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Oneplus Pad 3 China is more expensive than the average tablet (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • 4.81x less popular
    Oneplus Pad 3 China is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 1.12 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8.88 hours vs 10 hours
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • 37.8% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (675 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    675 g vs 490 g
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
gsmarena.com
27/12/2024
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 (China) - User opinions and reviews - page 2 Would you like a comparison of the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 performance against the Global S...
G
gsmarena.com
29/12/2024
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 (China) - User opinions and reviews
U
uswitch.com
07/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 Review - Uswitch
T
trustedreviews.com
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 Review: The only Android tablet you should buy
C
community.oneplus.com
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
[The Lab] OnePlus Pad 3 - A Practical Review!
E
expertreviews.co.uk
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 review: The best Android tablet around
U
uk.pcmag.com
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 - Review 2025 - PCMag UK
N
notebookcheck.net
03/09/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3: Why we reviewed the same tablet three times
S
sudinfo.be
16/06/2025
Summary of the review
Test – OnePlus Pad 3: une tablette qui monte encore un peu plus en gamme
(Translated)Show original
F
francoischarron.com
03/07/2025
Summary of the review
Testé: OnePlus Pad 3 une tablette proche de la perfection
(Translated)Show original
I
itdaily.fr
02/09/2025
Summary of the review
Test du OnePlus Pad 3 - ITdaily
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/06/2025
Summary of the review
Test OnePlus Pad 3: une alternative sérieuse aux tablettes haut de gamme
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
11/09/2025
Summary of the review
Test OnePlus Pad 3: notre avis complet
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 Review - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original
C
ct.nl
15/09/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 review: interessant voor zakelijke gebruikers?
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
28/08/2025
Summary of the review
Top tablet eindelijk wereldwijd verkrijgbaar - OnePlus Pad 3 tablet review
(Translated)Show original
M
mixedgrill.nl
15/08/2025
Summary of the review
Review: OnePlus Pad 3 - Mixed Grill
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
28/07/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 review: gewoon de beste Android-tablet van 2025
(Translated)Show original
A
androidplanet.nl
05/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 review: krachtpatser met weinig concessies
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
14/06/2025
Summary of the review
OnePlus Pad 3 review: neusje van de zalm
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Oneplus Pad 3 China

  • Cutting-edge performance powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor
  • Massive 13.2-inch 3.4K display with high resolution and smooth 144Hz refresh rate
  • Exceptional 12,140mAh battery capacity with very long standby time and 80W fast charging
  • Premium aluminum unibody design that feels high-end and sturdy
  • Immersive 8-speaker audio system (4 woofers, 4 tweeters) with deep bass and high volume
  • Advanced multitasking features like 'Open Canvas' for smooth split-screen and floating window use

What we don't like about Oneplus Pad 3 China

  • Lack of OLED panel; contrast can appear poor in dark environments compared to high-end rivals
  • Subpar camera quality, particularly the front-facing sensor for video calls
  • No physical fingerprint scanner, relying on PIN or facial recognition which struggles in low light
  • Significant software optimization issues with some apps not supporting landscape mode or split-screen
  • Accessories like the Stylo 2 and magnetic keyboard are expensive and sometimes reported as finicky or unstable on laps
  • No IP rating for water or dust resistance

Verdict

The OnePlus Pad 3 (released in China as the OnePlus Pad Pro) is a high-performance tablet featuring a 13.2-inch 3.4K LCD display with a 144Hz refresh rate, 900 nits peak brightness, and a unique 7:5 aspect ratio. It is powered by the flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite processor with up to 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM and 512GB of UFS 4.0 storage, supported by a massive 12,140mAh battery with 80W fast charging. Main pros include its desktop-class processing power for gaming and multitasking, an exceptionally slim 5.97mm metal unibody, and an immersive eight-speaker system. However, notable cons include the lack of an OLED panel, no microSD slot for expandable storage, the absence of a fingerprint sensor, and mediocre camera performance.

Compare Oneplus Pad 3 China with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Oneplus Pad 3 China and other tablets

No results found