OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£420RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 800

Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 47 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB)
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

35%

6.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

7.9

Reviews score

10%

6.4

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 56% of tablets
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 57%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

22%

5.4

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

7.3

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software

5%

5.1

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

â–²Better than 57%
7.9

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

9.2

Popularity

Grades by review (47)
28 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 14 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 52%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
  • nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
nokia-lumia-2520-2gb-32gb-4g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 32GB
Other versions:
2GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB)

Based on 20 · 21

Reviewers love the sharp screen and long battery life, but most dislike Windows RT and its thin app store.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

22%

5.4

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

6.6

Camera

14%

7.3

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.3

Software

5%

5.1

Design

3%

5.7

Audio

6.4
Reviews score
7.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

7.5
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 2 GB of RAM, which is less than 61.3% of tablets and equal to 15.5% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 800
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 800, which is more advanced than 64.1% of tablets and equal to 1.3% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a 1920×1080 screen, which is less sharp than 61.1% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
218 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 218 ppi, which is lower than 51.7% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 2
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass 2, which is more durable than 78.3% of tablets and the same as 1.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
6.7 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 6.7 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9, which is wider than 82.2% of tablets and equal to 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
8,120 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,120 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 74.4% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
30 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 30 W, which is faster than 71.2% of tablets and equal to 3.2% of tablets.
Battery life
11 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11 hours, which is longer than that of 60.8% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
yes
This tablet includes NFC. 89.3% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.2%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
615 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 615 g, which is heavier than 79.3% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 249 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (650 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    650 nits vs 401 nits
  • 250 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (650 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    650 nits vs 400 nits
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • 12.9% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 52% of models

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    9.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (47)
    28 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 14 estimated from the review. 19 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.9 vs 7.0
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 330 vs Mali-G51
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 249 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (650 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    650 nits vs 401 nits
  • 250 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (650 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    650 nits vs 400 nits
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • More durable glass
    This tablet has more durable glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 2 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1281:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,281:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Supports manual shutter speed
    This tablet supports manual shutter speed, while the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets support manual shutter speed.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Supports manual ISO
    This tablet supports manual ISO, while the average tablet does not. 45.9% of tablets support manual ISO.
  • 23% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,120 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,120 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Monitors battery health
    This tablet monitors battery health, while the average tablet does not. 36.7% of tablets monitor battery health.
  • 66.7% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (30 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    30 W vs 18 W
  • 1 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    11 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Includes NFC
    This tablet includes NFC, while the average tablet does not. 10.8% of tablets include NFC.
  • Faster USB ports
    This tablet has faster USB ports than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2).
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
    micro-HDMI port
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 14.7% lower sentiment score
    6.4 vs 7.5
  • 61.5% more expensive
    Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£420 vs £260).
    £420 vs £260
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 30.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (450 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    450 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    November 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,920×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's front camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 1.3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (6.7 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    6.7 MP vs 8 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.6% of tablets support widgets.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • 25.5% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (615 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    615 g vs 490 g
  • 91.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (267 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    267 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
OSReviews
≈ estimated
20/08/2016
Retro review · camera, browser and app tests
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a powerful tablet for Windows RT buyers, but the operating system holds it back.
8.0
BASIC thinking
≈ estimated
31/03/2014
Hands-on review · a week as the only device
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is enough for everyday use on Windows RT, though the keyboard dock and touchpad need work.
9.0
DetroitBORG
≈ estimated
25/01/2014
Unboxing and review · a week of use
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a well-built Windows RT tablet with a sharp screen and loud speakers, a good pick for LTE users.
8.0
All About Windows Phone
≈ estimated
17/01/2014
Hands-on review · hardware, apps and mobility
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a very good first tablet from Nokia, with room for improvement, mainly for mobile Windows users.
8.8
Jon Rettinger
✓ explicit
13/12/2013
Hands-on review · 10 days as main tablet
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a well-built, comfortable tablet with excellent battery life and a very good screen, though it has no stylus.
9.0
Hands-On Tech
≈ estimated
04/12/2013
Hands-on review · display, performance and battery
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a definite buy for anyone who wants Windows RT, though it cannot run older Windows apps.
8.0
GottaBeMobile
≈ estimated
25/11/2013
Full review · display, camera, apps and connectivity
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is an interesting, convincing option for anyone interested in Windows RT tablets.
8.0
MobileTechReview
≈ estimated
22/11/2013
Hands-on review · battery, gaming and carrier options
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a compelling alternative to Surface 2 if you need built-in LTE everywhere, not just Wi-Fi.
8.0
Geek.com
≈ estimated
21/11/2013
Hands-on review · hardware tour, ports and performance
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is one of the nicer Windows RT tablets, smoother than the Surface 2, though the Surface wins on style.
8.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
21/11/2013
Full review · battery, camera and performance tests
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a well-rounded tablet and a good first Nokia effort, though Windows RT's limitations remain.
9.0
Booredatwork.com
≈ estimated
21/11/2013
Hands-on review · camera, apps and charging tests
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is recommended as a Windows 8.1 tablet for the road, thanks to built-in 4G LTE.
9.0
BASIC thinking
≈ estimated
22/10/2013
Hands-on review · keyboard and feature tests
Verdict
Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is the best Windows RT tablet available right now, with a strong design and battery life, though the keyboard has flaws.
More graded video reviews (5)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.5
theverge.com
✓ explicit
22/11/2013
Hands-on review · LTE Windows tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a bright, LTE-equipped tablet for working on the move, but its keyboard cover adds bulk and its trackpad is poor.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
11/12/2013
Hands-on review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 has a bright screen, fast charging and an attractive design, but Windows RT and the lack of a kickstand hold it back.
7.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
20/11/2013
Full review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a bright, fast Windows RT tablet with LTE, but its thick body, yellow-tinted screen and smaller keyboard make the Surface 2 the better buy.
6.0
theguardian.com
✓ explicit
13/12/2013
Full review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 has bold, sturdy hardware and strong battery life, but crashes and lock-ups in Windows RT hold back its software.
6.0
stuff.tv
≈ estimated
06/12/2013
Hands-on review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a bright, eye-catching tablet whose Nokia apps set it apart, though Windows RT's thin app selection and slow Settings hold it back.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
04/01/2014
Full review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 suits web browsing and Office users wanting 4G and great battery life, but missing apps and fiddly tapping hold it back.
7.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
20/11/2013
Lab test · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a bright, fast tablet whose keyboard cover is comfortable to type on, but a limited app selection and tinny speakers let it down.
9.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
01/03/2014
Editor's review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is the best Windows RT tablet, with a slim, light body, bright Full HD screen and LTE, though its app store is thin.
8.0
wired.com
✓ explicit
05/12/2013
Quick review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a slick Windows 8.1 tablet with a fine screen, decent camera and about a day-and-a-half of battery, held back by a thin app store.
8.0
t3.com
✓ explicit
29/11/2013
Full review · Nokia apps tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a slick, fast tablet with standout Nokia apps, though it is a little heavy and its Windows Store still lacks big names.
5.0
gizmodo.com
≈ estimated
21/11/2013
Opinion review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a pretty, fast tablet, but with LTE as its only real extra over the Surface 2, it is hard to recommend.
7.0
allthingsd.com
≈ estimated
12/12/2013
Short-term review · Windows RT tablet
Verdict
The Nokia Lumia 2520 is a solid, speedy Windows tablet that can rival the Surface 2, but its thin app selection and need for a data plan limit it.
C
coolsmartphone.com
03/02/2014
≈ estimated
6.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 - Review Do you need technical specifications for the Nokia Lumia 2520 4G or information on its current software compatibility?
I
itpro.com
17/03/2014
✓ explicit
6.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet review
N
notebookcheck.net
16/05/2014
✓ explicit
8.4
Summary of the review
Review Nokia Lumia 2520 Tablet
C
computing.co.uk
11/12/2013
≈ estimated
8.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 review
A
arstechnica.com
20/11/2013
≈ estimated
8.0
Summary of the review
Hands on with the big, red quad-core Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet Would you like a comparison of the pros and cons mentioned in these reviews, or perhaps i...
E
engadget.com
21/11/2013
≈ estimated
8.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 review: a good Windows tablet, not the best ...
P
pcmag.com
22/11/2013
✓ explicit
7.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 (Verizon Wireless) Review
I
independent.co.uk
28/11/2013
≈ estimated
9.0
Summary of the review
Nokia Lumia 2520 review: Microsoft take note - this is how it's done

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Vibrant 10.1-inch 1080p display with industry-leading outdoor readability and 650 nits brightness
  • Built-in 4G LTE connectivity for always-on internet access
  • Excellent battery life, typically lasting over 10 hours of active use
  • Fast performance powered by the Snapdragon 800 processor
  • Includes full Microsoft Office RT suite (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook)
  • Attractive, colorful polycarbonate design that feels durable
  • Fast charging capabilities compared to contemporary rivals
  • Front-facing stereo speakers that are loud and clear

What customers don't like about Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB)

  • Windows RT 8.1 operating system is highly restrictive and lacks desktop app support
  • Significant lack of high-quality third-party apps in the Windows Store
  • No full-sized USB port on the tablet itself (requires an adapter or keyboard accessory)
  • The display is known to have a noticeable yellowish tint on white backgrounds
  • Pointy corners and slippery glossy finish can make it uncomfortable to hold
  • The optional Power Keyboard accessory is expensive and has a small touchpad
  • Glossy finish is a major fingerprint magnet
  • MicroSD slot is difficult to access, requiring a paperclip or key

Verdict

The Nokia Lumia 2520 4G is a 10.1-inch Windows RT 8.1 tablet featuring a vibrant 1920x1080 Full HD IPS ClearBlack display with an exceptional 650-nit brightness for outdoor readability. It is powered by a 2.2GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 processor paired with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD up to 32GB or 64GB depending on the card. Key characteristics include its signature Lumia polycarbonate unibody design, 4G LTE connectivity, a 6.7MP rear camera with ZEISS optics, and a large 8,000mAh battery supporting fast charging (0–80% in one hour). Its main pros are the outstanding display quality, long battery life, and the inclusion of full Microsoft Office RT. However, significant cons include the limitations of the Windows RT operating system, which cannot run standard desktop apps, and a very restricted selection in the Windows Store.

Compare Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nokia Lumia 2520 4G (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found