Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£270RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.9/10

Overall score

Score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 93% of tablets
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 90%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

3.9

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 89%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £270
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

3.9

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

4.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.9

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 86.8% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 70.5% of tablets and equal to those in 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
6,500 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 50.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
730 g
This tablet weighs 730 g which is heavier than 89.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (2041:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    2,041:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 36 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (436 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    436 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (2041:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    2,041:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 36 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (436 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    436 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 14.8% worse value for money
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.18 vs 7.1).
    6.18 vs 7.1
  • 4.81x less popular
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 1,199 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    667 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 83.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 48.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (333 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    333 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 97 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (304 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    304 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    2.1 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 49% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (730 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    730 g vs 490 g
  • 4.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (12.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    12.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 8 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    2011 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
23/02/2011
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
N
neilgrogan.com
27/08/2011
Summary of the review
G
gsmarena.com
Various Dates
Summary of the review
T
theglobeandmail.com
08/04/2011
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
19/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
23/03/2011
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
02/03/2011
Summary of the review
A
app-entwickler-verzeichnis.de
29/10/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
06/11/2026
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
24/05/2011
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
20/06/2011
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
22/05/2011
Summary of the review
M
macwelt.de
06/06/2011
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
08/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
17/07/2011
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
28/04/2011
Summary of the review
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
18/04/2011
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/03/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB)

  • Solid build quality and premium, attractive design
  • Strong battery life, lasting up to 10-12 hours in some tests
  • Large, high-resolution 10.1-inch display with crisp text and good viewing angles
  • First tablet to feature Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), optimized for tablets
  • Powerful hardware, including a dual-core processor for fast performance
  • Useful physical connectivity options like Micro-HDMI output

What we don't like about Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB)

  • Considerably heavier and bulkier than competitors like the iPad 2
  • Software felt rushed at launch, with frequent app 'force closes' and system lag
  • Limited selection of tablet-optimized apps in the Android Market (at launch)
  • The screen can be highly reflective, making outdoor use difficult
  • Initial lack of support for the microSD card slot and Adobe Flash
  • High initial price point compared to other mobile computing options

Verdict

The Motorola XOOM MZ604 WiFi is a pioneer Android tablet featuring a 10.1-inch widescreen display with 1280 x 800 resolution and Corning Gorilla Glass protection. It is powered by a 1GHz dual-core NVIDIA Tegra 2 processor paired with 1GB of RAM, and while this specific configuration lists 64GB of storage, it typically launched with 16GB or 32GB internal flash memory and a microSD slot for expansion. Key characteristics include a 5MP rear camera with dual-LED flash capable of 720p HD video, a 2MP front-facing camera for video chat, and a robust 6500 mAh battery providing up to 10 hours of video playback. Main pros include its responsive high-resolution screen, mini-HDMI output for TV viewing, and its clean interface as the first device to run the tablet-optimized Android 3.0 Honeycomb OS. Notable cons include its significant weight of 1.6 lbs, which can be tiresome to hold, high screen reflectivity that hinders outdoor use, and a limited selection of tablet-specific applications compared to competitors.

Compare Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found