Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£270RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.0

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 93% of tablets
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

â–¼Worse than 90%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.2

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 89%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £270
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

4.0

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.6

Camera

14%

4.8

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.2

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

9.1

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 86.8% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 70.5% of tablets and equal to those in 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
6,500 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,500 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 50.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
730 g
This tablet weighs 730 g which is heavier than 89.5% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (2041:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    2,041:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 36 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (436 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    436 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (2041:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    2,041:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 36 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (436 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    436 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 14.6% worse value for money
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.2 vs 7.1).
    6.2 vs 7.1
  • 4.81x less popular
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 75% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 83.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    2.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 48.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (333 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    333 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 97 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (304 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    304 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 72 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    2.1 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 49% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (730 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    730 g vs 490 g
  • 4.9 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (12.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    12.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 8 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    March 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • 73.8 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (249.1 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    249.1 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
23/02/2011
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
29/06/2011
Summary of the review
N
neilgrogan.com
27/08/2011
Summary of the review
G
gsmarena.com
Various Dates
Summary of the review
T
theglobeandmail.com
08/04/2011
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
19/04/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
23/03/2011
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
02/03/2011
Summary of the review
A
app-entwickler-verzeichnis.de
29/10/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
05/11/2026
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
24/05/2011
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
20/05/2011
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
20/06/2011
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
22/05/2011
Summary of the review
M
macwelt.de
06/06/2011
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
08/06/2011
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
17/07/2011
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
28/04/2011
Summary of the review
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
18/04/2011
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/03/2011
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Solid build quality and premium, attractive design
  • Strong battery life, lasting up to 10-12 hours in some tests
  • Large, high-resolution 10.1-inch display with crisp text and good viewing angles
  • First tablet to feature Android 3.0 (Honeycomb), optimized for tablets
  • Powerful hardware, including a dual-core processor for fast performance
  • Useful physical connectivity options like Micro-HDMI output

What we don't like about Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Considerably heavier and bulkier than competitors like the iPad 2
  • Software felt rushed at launch, with frequent app 'force closes' and system lag
  • Limited selection of tablet-optimized apps in the Android Market (at launch)
  • The screen can be highly reflective, making outdoor use difficult
  • Initial lack of support for the microSD card slot and Adobe Flash
  • High initial price point compared to other mobile computing options

Verdict

The Motorola XOOM MZ604 is a 10.1-inch Wi-Fi-only tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 resolution widescreen display and a dual-core 1GHz NVIDIA Tegra 2 processor. This specific model includes 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal flash storage, expandable via a microSD card slot. Its hardware is highlighted by a 5MP rear camera with dual LED flash capable of 720p HD video capture, a 2MP front-facing camera for video calls, and integrated stereo speakers. Main pros include its solid build quality, responsive multitasking performance for its era, and dedicated micro-HDMI output for television connectivity. However, notable cons include its relatively heavy weight (730g), high screen reflectivity, and a lack of modern app compatibility due to its legacy Android operating system.

Compare Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Motorola Xoom Mz604 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found