OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:3 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:6.95 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 4 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

35%

5.8

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.8

Reviews score

10%

5.8

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 75% of tablets
7.2

Value for money

Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 72%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

4.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.4

Audio

â–¼Worse than 58%
5.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

5.8

Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

6.6

Popularity

Grades by review (4)
4 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 72%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £220
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
3GB + 64GB2GB + 16GB3GB + 32GB4GB + 32GB4GB + 64GB

What reviewers say about the Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB)

Based on 4

Reviewers like the long battery life and simple software, but the camera is consistently seen as weak.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB)

Based on 44 owners sharing their experience in online comments

34%positive5%mixed61%negative

Owners praise its big, capable screen and gaming speed, but recurring software, calling, and playback problems frustrate them most.

What owners dislike

  • Calls and mobile signal are unreliable: calls may not connect or ring, the phone drops from 4G to 3G or loses signal, and the Calls function can stop working.6
  • Performance feels slow in everyday use, with the home screen and interface lagging, especially on the 2 GB RAM version.5
  • Software updates fail to install or never arrive, with an error message appearing after the download.4
  • Video playback problems4
  • Screen brightness is weak, the display can look dim or pale, and some owners report the screen shifting or breaking.4
  • Sound comes from only one speaker in some units, and the built-in radio has interference and static.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.9

Display

16%

6.9

Camera

14%

4.1

Battery

12%

7.3

Connectivity

8%

8.5

Software

5%

6.3

Design

3%

6.4

Audio

5.8
Reviews score
5.8
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.2
RAM capacity
3 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 3 GB of RAM, which is less than 52.9% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process, which is smaller than 44.6% of tablets and equal to 8.5% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
332 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 332 points in single-core tests, which is lower than 79.5% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
This tablet runs on Qualcomm Snapdragon 450, which is more advanced than 55% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2160×1080
This tablet has a 2160×1080 screen, which is sharper than 57.9% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
350 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 350 ppi, which is higher than 98.3% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 13 MP resolution, which is higher than 73.9% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 5 MP resolution, which is higher than 48.6% of tablets and equal to 19.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
5,180 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,180 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 62.6% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
yes
This tablet has built-in LTE. 57.1% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
?
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
195 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 195 g, which is lighter than 99.8% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.7% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 58.4% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (350 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    350 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • 60.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (195 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    195 g vs 490 g
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51).
    Adreno 506 vs Mali-G51
  • 58.4% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (350 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    350 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2160×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    2,160×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports LTE
    This tablet supports LTE, while the average tablet does not. 42.9% of tablets support LTE.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Fingerprint unlocking
    This tablet supports fingerprint unlocking, while the average tablet does not. 16% of tablets offer this.
    Rear-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • 60.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (195 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    195 g vs 490 g
  • 88.8 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (86.5 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    86.5 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.3% of tablets support LDAC.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 3.15 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    6.95 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 17.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    6.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (4)
    4 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.8 vs 7.0
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • 59.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (762 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    762 points vs 1,891 points
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • 17.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.4 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    6.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (4)
    4 reviews: 0 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.8 vs 7.0
  • 22.7% lower sentiment score
    5.8 vs 7.5
  • 4.2% worse value for money
    Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.25 vs 7.6).
    7.25 vs 7.55
  • 59.7% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (762 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    762 points vs 1,891 points
  • 933 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    933 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 54.5% lower single-core score
    This tablet has a lower single-core score than the average tablet (332 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests.
    332 points vs 729 points
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 49.9% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (7.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    7.46 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 1 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (3 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    3 GB vs 4 GB
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 3.15 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    6.95 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 51 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 21.5% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,180 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,180 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5).
    4.2 vs 5
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
trustedreviews.com
≈ estimated
25/02/2019
Hands-on test · Big-screen phablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab V7 is a big-screen device for budget buyers with clean Android and a long-lasting battery, but its camera falls short.
6.0
androidauthority.com
≈ estimated
25/02/2019
Hands-on first look · Tablet-phone hybrid
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab V7 is a big phone-tablet hybrid that is light enough to hold in one hand and has a big battery, but its modest processor will not win any speed tests.
8.0
engadget.com
≈ estimated
24/02/2019
Hands-on test · Big-screen phone
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab V7 is a 6.9-inch phone with smooth performance and a huge battery, well suited to long bus rides, but its cameras underwhelm.
7.0
fonearena.com
≈ estimated
06/08/2019
Week-long review · Dual-SIM phablet
Verdict
The Lenovo Tab V7 is a decent mid-range phablet for calls and everyday battery life, but its gaming performance lags behind.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB)

  • Large 6.9-inch Full HD IPS display with an 18:9 aspect ratio is ideal for streaming Netflix and YouTube.
  • Massive 5,180 mAh battery easily lasts an entire day or more on a single charge.
  • Dual front-facing speakers with Dolby Audio provide clear and loud sound for movies.
  • Slim, lightweight design (under 200g) makes it portable enough to fit in some pockets.
  • Includes essential features like a 3.5mm headphone jack, fingerprint scanner, and dual-SIM support.

What customers don't like about Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB)

  • Snapdragon 450 processor is underpowered, leading to noticeable stuttering in menus and Chrome.
  • Cameras are basic; the 13MP rear sensor struggles significantly in low light and produces washed-out colors.
  • Charging speed is limited to 10W, which takes a long time to fill the large battery.
  • The 6.9-inch size can be awkward for one-handed use, particularly when reaching for the fingerprint sensor or camera shutter.
  • Stuck on older Android versions (Android 9) with no path for modern OS updates.

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab V7 is a versatile tablet-smartphone hybrid featuring a 6.95-inch Full HD (1080 x 2160) IPS display with an 18:9 aspect ratio and 350 nits of brightness. It is powered by an octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 processor and this specific model includes 3GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, expandable up to 128GB via a dedicated microSD slot. Key characteristics include 4G LTE connectivity with dual-SIM support, a 13MP autofocus rear camera, a 5MP front camera, and a large 5,180mAh battery providing up to 10 hours of video playback. Pros include its ultra-portable, slim design that allows for one-handed use, loud front-facing speakers with Dolby Audio, and dual biometric security with both a rear fingerprint sensor and face unlock. However, its main cons include a dated Android 9.0 Pie operating system with limited update prospects, slow 10W charging speeds, and a mid-range processor that may exhibit stuttering during heavy multitasking or demanding gaming.

Compare Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab V7 (3GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found