OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8732

Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 61% of tablets
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 63% of tablets
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 130 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 73% of tablets
  • lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g
  • lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g
  • lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g
lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g
lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g
lenovo-tab-2-a10-70-2gb-16gb-4g

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 16GB
Other versions:
2GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

4.9

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

5.2

Design

3%

5.9

Audio & Multimedia

5.7
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on 130 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) has a user popularity of 6.1 points, which is lower than 60.2% of Tablets.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.0
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8732
Chipset
MediaTek MT8732
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
This tablet uses the MediaTek MT8732 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 88% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
Main camera aperture
f/1.9
â–² Better than 82% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 which is wider than that of 82.2% of tablets and equal to that of 3.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
Battery capacity
7,000 mAh
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 3.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
â–² Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
509 g
Weight
509 g
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 509 g which is heavier than 55.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
yes
Dolby Atmos support
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This tablet supports Dolby Atmos. 68.6% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1440:1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1440:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,440:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1440:1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1440:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,440:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Supports Dolby Atmos
    Dolby Atmos support
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This tablet supports Dolby Atmos, the average tablet does not. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T760 MP2
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T760 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T760 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 5.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.56 vs 8.000).
    7.56 vs 8
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T760 MP2
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T760 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T760 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 15% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.7 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.7 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • 20 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    380 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (380 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    380 nits vs 400 nits
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 47 mm taller
    Width
    247.0 mm
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (247 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    247.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2015
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2015 vs 2019).
    April 2015
    2015 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

F
forums.anandtech.com
12/09/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70 10.1" FHD Tablet Hands On Review YouTube
T
trustedreviews.com
05/03/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo TAB 2 A10-70 Review - Trusted Reviews
P
pocketnow.com
17/10/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70 review: Cutting all the right corners
L
laptopmag.com
14/09/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10 Tablet - Review & Full Benchmarks
P
pcmag.com
30/11/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70 Review - PCMag
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/11/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70 Review - PCMag UK
N
notebookcheck.net
01/10/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70L - Notebookcheck.net External Reviews
N
notebookcheck.com
11/09/2015
Summary of the review
Test Lenovo TAB 2 A10-70 Tablet
(Translated)Show original
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
27/04/2016
Summary of the review
[Topic Unique] Test Tablette Tactile: Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
29/10/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70: l'exception Full HD à petit prix
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
27/04/2016
Summary of the review
Test Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70: bonne surprise à petit prix
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/10/2015
Summary of the review
Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70F - Test, Reviews & Prijzen - Consumentenbond
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
03/03/2015
Summary of the review
Hands-on review Lenovo Tab 2 en Miix 300 tablets | FWD
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 130 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • High-quality 1920x1200 Full HD display that is sharp and color-accurate for its price.
  • Exceptional battery life, often lasting between 7 and 13+ hours depending on usage.
  • Excellent value for money, offering premium display specs in a budget-friendly 10-inch form factor.
  • Powerful audio performance enhanced by Dolby Atmos technology, especially when using headphones.
  • Includes a microSD card slot for easy storage expansion.
  • Runs a mostly stock Android experience with minimal bloatware.

What we don't like about Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • Middling overall performance; it can feel sluggish during multitasking or when switching between apps.
  • Struggles with high-end 3D gaming, experiencing frame rate drops and long load times.
  • Heavier and thicker design than competitors, which can lead to hand fatigue during long sessions.
  • Awkward headphone jack placement on the top/side that can cause cables to obstruct the screen in landscape mode.
  • Reported Wi-Fi connectivity issues, such as frequent dropping of signals or shutting off during sleep mode.
  • Lack of ongoing software support, leaving the device on older Android versions like Lollipop.

Verdict

The Lenovo Tab 2 A10-70 4G is a budget-friendly 10.1-inch tablet featuring a sharp Full HD IPS display (1920 x 1200) and a quad-core 1.7 GHz MediaTek MT8732 processor. This model is equipped with 2GB of LPDDR3 RAM and 16GB of internal eMMC storage, which can be expanded by up to 64GB via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include 4G LTE connectivity, an 8MP autofocus rear camera, a 5MP front camera, and a multi-speaker soundbar enhanced with Dolby Atmos technology. Its main advantages are its high-resolution screen for the price point, immersive audio quality, and a long-lasting 7000mAh battery providing up to 10 hours of use. However, notable drawbacks include middling performance that struggles with heavy gaming, a somewhat bulky and heavy build (approx. 509g), and a frustrating headphone jack placement that can interfere with viewing in landscape mode.

Compare Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Tab 2 A10 70 4G (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found