Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:9 inchesChipset:NVIDIA Tegra 3

Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

6.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 89% of tablets
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 92%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 88%
  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £80
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 8GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

4.9
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) has a user popularity of 5.9 points, which is lower than 58.1% of Tablets.
5.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
1 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 86.8% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
NVIDIA Tegra 3
This tablet uses the NVIDIA Tegra 3 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 64.8% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
168 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 168 ppi which is lower than that of 81.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
3 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 3 MP which is lower than that of 92.5% of tablets and equal to that of 0.9% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 4.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
web browsing
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
570 g
This tablet weighs 570 g which is heavier than 69.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
?
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the NVIDIA Tegra 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    NVIDIA Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 3.25x cheaper
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£80 vs £260).
    £80 vs £260
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 3.25x cheaper
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£80 vs £260).
    £80 vs £260
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the NVIDIA Tegra 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    NVIDIA Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 5 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3 MP vs 8 MP
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 17.4% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.81 vs 8.000).
    6.81 vs 8
  • 8.6% worse value for money
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.53 vs 7.1).
    6.53 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 75% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 36% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (416 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    416 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 181 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (220 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    220 nits vs 401 nits
  • 25% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (168 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    168 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 53 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (168 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    168 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 1.1 inches smaller screen size
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (9 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    9 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 5 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (3 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    3 MP vs 8 MP
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    web browsing
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 8.8% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    3.0 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 3.65 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.65 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 16.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (570 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    570 g vs 490 g
  • 7 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    August 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 59.8 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (259.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    259.8 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
tabletpccomparison.net
18/02/2020
Summary of the review
C
computing.co.uk
18/01/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
17/10/2012
Summary of the review
A
androidcommunity.com
09/10/2012
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
08/10/2012
Summary of the review
A
androidpolice.com
06/10/2012
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
04/09/2012
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
12/10/2012
Summary of the review
S
sueddeutsche.de
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
H
hifitest.de
29/01/2013
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
28/11/2012
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
12/10/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Powerful quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3 processor provides snappy performance for daily tasks and gaming
  • Durable build quality featuring a brushed aluminum back that feels solid and premium
  • Includes essential connectivity and expansion options like a microSD card slot and micro-HDMI port
  • Reliable battery life that can last through a full day of normal usage or around 7–10 hours of continuous video/browsing
  • Competitive budget-friendly price point for a 9-inch tablet
  • Surprisingly loud and clear speakers that outperform many other budget tablets

What we don't like about Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Subpar TN display with poor color reproduction, grainy resolution, and extremely narrow viewing angles
  • Chunky and heavy design at 0.5 inches thick, making it less portable and tiring to hold for long periods
  • Poor camera performance, specifically low-frame-rate video recording and grainy still images
  • Hidden and difficult-to-access microSD card slot located under a hard-to-pry plastic strip
  • Loaded with a significant amount of pre-installed bloatware that can occasionally cause interface lag
  • Lack of standard accessories and support compared to more popular rivals like the Google Nexus 7

Verdict

The Lenovo IdeaTab A2109 is a 9-inch Android 4.0 tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 WXGA LED display and a sturdy brushed-aluminum construction. It is powered by a 1.2GHz quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a microSD card slot hidden behind a removable panel. Key advantages include its snappy performance for web browsing and gaming, the inclusion of a micro-HDMI port for external display connectivity, and a solid build quality at an affordable price point. However, the tablet suffers from several notable drawbacks, including a display with very poor viewing angles, a bulky and relatively heavy design, and mediocre camera performance that produces noisy stills and low-frame-rate video.

Compare Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Ideatab A2109 (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found