OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£90RAM capacity:6 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:8.7 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 680

Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

90%

6.7

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 62% of tablets
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

6.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.0

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 63% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £90

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
6GB + 128GB4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

7.0

Camera

14%

6.0

Battery

12%

7.4

Connectivity

8%

9.1

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.0

Audio & Multimedia

6.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
RAM capacity
6 GB
RAM capacity
6 GB
â–² Better than 65% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 6 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 65.3% of tablets and equal to that of 7% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Process node
6 nm
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
416 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
416 points
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 416 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 64.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 4% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
â–² Better than 59% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 58.7% of tablets and equal to those in 1.8% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1340×800
Screen resolution
1340×800
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1340×800 which is lower than that of 64.2% of tablets and equal to that of 1.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Refresh rate
90 Hz
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 90 Hz which is higher than in 73.8% of tablets and equal to that in 6.5% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
179 ppi
Pixel density
179 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 179 ppi which is lower than that of 74.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
â–² Better than 49% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,900 mAh
Battery capacity
6,900 mAh
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,900 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 53.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
17.75 hours
Battery life
17.75 hours
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 17.75 hours, which is longer than that of 93.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android 15
Operating system
Android 15
★ Better than 92% of models
This tablet uses the Android 15 operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 91.9%.
Update support duration
?
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
On-device AI
yes
â–² Better than 72% of models
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
365 g
Weight
365 g
â–² Better than 79% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 365 g which is lighter than 78.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 7.75 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    17.75 hours
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (17.8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    17.75 hours vs 10 hours
  • 224 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    625 nits
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (625 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    625 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 15
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 15 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 15 vs Android
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    500 nits
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.4 GHz
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£90 vs £260).
    £90 vs £260
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 610
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 20% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    2.4 GHz
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    Process node
    6 nm
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    6 GB
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (6 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 43% higher memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    21.3 GB/s
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    21.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 224 nits higher peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    625 nits
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a higher peak brightness than the average tablet (625 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    625 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% higher refresh rate
    Refresh rate
    90 Hz
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 100 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    500 nits
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (500 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    500 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1500:1
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1500:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,500:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • 7.75 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    17.75 hours
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (17.8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    17.75 hours vs 10 hours
  • More advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Android 15
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    This tablet has a more advanced operating system than the average tablet (Android 15 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Android 15 vs Android
  • Includes on-device AI
    On-device AI
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    Dynamic theme
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • 25.5% lighter
    Weight
    365 g
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (365 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    365 g vs 490 g
  • 6 newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2025 vs 2019).
    July 2025
    2025 vs 2019
  • 50.5 mm narrower
    Width
    124.8 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (124.8 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    124.8 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 75.2 mm shorter
    Width
    124.8 mm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (124.8 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    124.8 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    179 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • Narrower color gamut
    Color gamut
    NTSC
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 1.4 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    8.7 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 42.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    416 points
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (416 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    416 points vs 729 points
  • 4.81x less popular
    Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 42.9% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    416 points
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (416 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    416 points vs 729 points
  • 22.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,466 points
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1466 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,466 points vs 1,891 points
  • 20.1% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    179 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Narrower color gamut
    Color gamut
    NTSC
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 1.4 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    8.7 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    8.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1340×800
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1340×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1340×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 42 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    179 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (179 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    179 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pocketmags.com
02/01/2026
Summary of the review
Honor Pad X7 | PC Pro January 2026 - Pocketmags Nota: Fai attenzione a non confondere questo tablet con lo smartphone "Honor X7" (uscito nel 2022), ch...
(Translated)Show original
P
pocketmags.com
02/01/2026
Summary of the review
Honor Pad X7
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Excellent battery life with a large 7,020mAh capacity and 56-day standby time
  • Premium-feeling aluminum metal back panel that is durable and resists fingerprints
  • Smooth 90Hz display refresh rate, which is uncommon for tablets in its budget category
  • Compact and lightweight design (365g) making it easy to hold for reading and gaming
  • Includes Google Mobile Services (GMS) and ships with recent software like Android 15
  • Good value for money, often described as an 'incredible bargain'
  • Supports reverse wired charging to power up other small devices like earbuds

What we don't like about Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB)

  • Extremely slow 10W charging speed for such a large battery
  • Modest HD+ screen resolution (1340x800) with a noticeable gap between the glass and touchscreen
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Significant screen bezels compared to higher-end models
  • Underwhelming camera quality, with reviewers noting a 'fake' second camera lens used only for design symmetry
  • Occasional app compatibility issues reported on the Play Store by some users
  • Limited viewing angles that require staying in the 'sweet spot' to avoid dimness

Verdict

The Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) is a compact 8.7-inch budget tablet featuring an IPS LCD with a 90Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 1340 x 800 pixels. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 octa-core chipset, paired with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage that can be expanded up to 1TB via microSD. The device includes a large 7,020mAh battery with 10W wired and reverse charging, an 8MP rear camera, a 5MP front camera, and runs on Android 15. Key pros include its smooth 90Hz display, lightweight 365g metal build, and robust battery life, while primary cons are the slow 10W charging speed, lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack, and modest HD+ screen resolution.

Compare Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Honor Pad X7 4G (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found