OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£770RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:12.3 inchesChipset:Intel Core m3-8100Y

Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB)
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

90%

6.8

Technical score

10%

6.8

User score

â–²Better than 64% of tablets
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 67%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

7.6

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.6

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

5.1

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 66%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 88%
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
  • google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
google-pixel-slate-8th-gen-intel-core-m3-8gb-64gb
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

22%

6.4

Performance

20%

6.5

Display

16%

6.8

Camera

14%

7.6

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

8.6

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

5.1

Audio & Multimedia

6.8
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 4 points, which is higher than 55.1% of Tablets.
4.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

6.5

Price

6.7
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
893 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 893 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 54.9% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core m3-8100Y
This tablet uses the Intel Core m3-8100Y chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 61.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
3000×2000
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3000×2000 which is higher than that of 96.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
293 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 293 ppi which is higher than that of 90.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 5
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass which is stronger than that on 93.8% of tablets and equal to that on 5.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 which is wider than that of 85.9% of tablets and equal to that of 14.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Chrome
This tablet uses the Chrome operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 97.6%.
Update support duration
long
This tablet offers long update support, which is longer than the support period of 80% of tablets and equal to that of 20% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
731 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 731 g which is heavier than 90.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3000×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3000×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 70% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core m3-8100Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core m3-8100Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 70% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core m3-8100Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core m3-8100Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.23x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (33.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    33.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3000×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3000×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 30.8% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (293 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    293 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 72 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (293 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    293 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1473:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,473:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Longer update support
    This tablet offers longer update support than the average tablet (long vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    long vs medium
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Chrome vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Chrome vs Android
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 49.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (731 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    731 g vs 490 g
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • 2.96x more expensive
    Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£770 vs £260).
    £770 vs £260
  • 17.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3
    the average tablet
    Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.79 vs 8.000).
    6.79 vs 8
  • 5.7% worse value for money
    Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.72 vs 7.1).
    6.72 vs 7.1
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 53.8% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (300 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    300 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 21.2% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,491 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,491 points vs 1,891 points
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Chrome vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Chrome vs Android
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • 49.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (731 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    731 g vs 490 g
  • 115.6 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (290.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    290.9 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9
9to5google.com
15/06/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate m3: Is the new base model worth buying?
T
thesun.co.uk
27/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review – this half tablet, half laptop is...
T
techradar.com
08/11/2018
Summary of the review
Hands on: Google Pixel Slate review Reddit
Z
zoneoftech.com
31/01/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate Review - ZONEofTECH
J
journalmetro.com
05/12/2018
Summary of the review
Essai: la Pixel Slate entre deux chaises - Journal Métro
(Translated)Show original
9
9to5google.com
15/06/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate m3: Is the new base model worth buying? (Translated/French-focused content available)
(Translated)Show original
E
es.gizmodo.com
28/11/2018
Summary of the review
El Pixel Slate de Google es una respuesta brillante al iPad Pro, pero tiene un problema de identidad
(Translated)Show original
T
techzilla.it
09/10/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate: il nuovo tablet con tastiera di Google con Chrome OS
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB)

  • High-resolution 12.3-inch 'Molecular Display' with excellent clarity and vibrant colors
  • Top-tier front-facing stereo speakers that deliver loud, rich, and full-bodied audio
  • Sleek and lightweight aluminum design that feels premium and well-balanced
  • Excellent battery life, often lasting 10-12 hours for light productivity and media
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button
  • Dual USB-C ports allowing for simultaneous charging and peripheral connection

What customers don't like about Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB)

  • Software bugs and performance jitters in Chrome OS tablet mode, especially with Android app integration
  • High total cost of ownership as essential accessories like the keyboard and pen are sold separately
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD slot for expandable storage
  • Core m3 processor can struggle or lag when handling heavy multitasking or dozens of open tabs
  • Official keyboard accessory is unstable for lap use and can be prone to flexing
  • Large 12.3-inch form factor feels unwieldy or heavy for casual one-handed tablet use

Verdict

The Google Pixel Slate (8th Gen Intel Core m3 / 8GB RAM / 64GB SSD) is a sleek 12.3-inch Chrome OS tablet featuring a high-resolution 'Molecular Display' with 3000 x 2000 pixels (293 ppi) and dual front-firing speakers. Key advantages include its lightweight 1.6 lb anodized aluminium design, approximately 10–12 hours of battery life with fast charging, a secure Titan C security chip, and a power button that doubles as a responsive fingerprint sensor. However, notable drawbacks include the lack of a built-in headphone jack or microSD slot for expandable storage, the requirement to purchase the essential keyboard and stylus separately, and occasional performance stutters during multitasking compared to higher-tier processor configurations.

Compare Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Slate 8th Gen Intel Core M3 (8GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found