OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£160RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8788

Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB)
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

35%

6.3

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.4, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 51% of tablets
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–²Better than 64%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

7.6

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

8.0

Software

5%

4.3

Design

3%

7.5

Audio

â–²Better than 55%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.4.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
fossibot-dt1-lite-4gb-64gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

22%

6.6

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

7.6

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

8.0

Software

5%

4.3

Design

3%

7.5

Audio

6.3
Reviews score
7.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

7.8
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 4 GB of RAM, which is more than 47.2% of tablets and equal to 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process, which is smaller than 53.2% of tablets and equal to 13.9% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 64 GB of internal storage, which is more than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 17% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8788
This tablet runs on MediaTek MT8788, which is less advanced than 84.2% of tablets and equal to 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
This tablet has a 2000×1200 screen, which is sharper than 58.1% of tablets and equal to 8.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
225 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 225 ppi, which is higher than 61.7% of tablets and equal to 1.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
AGC Dragontrail Glass
This tablet protects its screen with AGC Dragontrail Glass, which is less durable than 54.6% of tablets and the same as 2.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 13 MP resolution, which is higher than 73.9% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
16 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 16 MP resolution, which is higher than 97% of tablets and equal to 1.4% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2, which is wider than 30.1% of tablets and equal to 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
11,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 11,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 95.6% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
6.5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 91.1% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
gaming
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
?
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.7% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet supports app tracking protection. 71.6% of tablets offer this.
Show more
IP rating
IP68/IP69K
This tablet's IP rating is IP68/IP69K, which is more protected than 98.3% of tablets and the same as 1.7% of tablets.
Weight
792 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 792 g, which is heavier than 94.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 11 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (16 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    16 MP vs 5 MP
  • 66.7% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (11,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    11,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68/IP69K vs not rated).
    IP68/IP69K vs not rated
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (Mali-G72 MP3 vs Mali-G51).
    Mali-G72 MP3 vs Mali-G51
  • 4 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    June 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 14.3% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (12 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.6% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 40 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (440 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    440 nits vs 400 nits
  • 0.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Sharper display
    This tablet has a sharper screen than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200).
    2,000×1,200 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 39 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (440 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    440 nits vs 401 nits
  • 1.8% sharper screen detail
    This tablet has sharper screen detail than the average tablet (225 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    225 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 11 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (16 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    16 MP vs 5 MP
  • 5 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (13 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    13 MP vs 8 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 66.7% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (11,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    11,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports app tracking protection
    This tablet supports app tracking protection, while the average tablet does not. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68/IP69K vs not rated).
    IP68/IP69K vs not rated
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 3.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    gaming
    6.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 61.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (792 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    792 g vs 490 g
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Less durable glass
    This tablet has less durable glass than the average tablet (AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). The average tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass.
    AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (1000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 3.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    gaming
    6.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • 61.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (792 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    792 g vs 490 g
  • 6.6 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (14.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    14.6 mm vs 8 mm
  • No keyboard accessory
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Exceptional ruggedness with IP68/IP69K and MIL-STD-810H certifications for water, dust, and drop protection
  • Massive 11,000mAh battery providing long usage times, often lasting a full day or more
  • Sharp and bright 10.4-inch 2K FHD+ display that remains usable in sunlight
  • Solid build quality with reinforced corners and a grippy, textured back
  • Includes helpful modern features like Android 13 and quad stereo speakers

What customers don't like about Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Noticeably heavy and bulky (approx. 792g and 20.5mm thick) compared to standard tablets
  • Limited processing power that may struggle with graphically intensive games or heavy multitasking
  • Conflicting reports regarding the microSD card slot, with some users unable to find one despite descriptions suggesting expandable storage
  • Slow 10W charging speed for such a large battery capacity
  • Potential reliability issues including reports of sudden screen flickering or total hardware failure after a few months
  • Unreliable GPS performance reported by some users specifically for navigation tasks
  • Lack of a physical 3.5mm headphone jack

Verdict

The Fossibot DT1 Lite is a rugged Android 13 tablet featuring a 10.4-inch 2K IPS display (2000 x 1200) and an expansive 11,000mAh battery that supports reverse charging via OTG. Powered by a MediaTek MT8788 octa-core processor with 4GB of physical RAM (expandable to 7GB via virtual memory) and 64GB of internal storage, it is designed for durability with IP68, IP69K, and MIL-STD-810H certifications for water, dust, and shock resistance. Its main pros include an exceptionally long battery life of up to 1,000 hours standby, a high-resolution screen with 400 nits brightness, and clear audio from quad stereo speakers. However, notable cons include its significant weight and bulk due to the rugged build, a relatively slow 10W charging speed for such a large battery, and the lack of a SIM card slot in this WiFi-only version.

Compare Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fossibot DT1 Lite WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found