Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ660RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon S4

Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

7.2

User score

â–ĽWorse than 70% of tablets
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

â–ĽWorse than 95%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

5.3

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.7

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

4.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

â–ĽWorse than 72%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

â–ĽWorse than 81%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ660
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 64GB2GB + 32GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

5.3

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.7

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.4

Software & Features

5%

4.9

Design

3%

5.5

Audio & Multimedia

5.4
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

5.8

Number of reviews

7.2
Popularity
Popularity
5.8/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 5.8 points, which is lower than 57% of Tablets.
5.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

6.0
RAM capacity
2 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 75.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366Ă—768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366Ă—768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
155 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 155 ppi which is lower than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Display glass type
AGC Dragontrail Glass
This tablet uses AGC Dragontrail Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 54.6% of tablets and equal to that on 2.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
3,640 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,640 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 91.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
30 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 30 W which is faster than in 71.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 3.2% of tablets.
Battery life
7 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 7 hours, which is shorter than that of 85.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
635 g
This tablet weighs 635 g which is heavier than 81.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
?
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 225 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 66.7% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (30 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    30 W vs 18 W
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 225 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 66.7% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (30 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    30 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,640 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,640 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 17.5% worse value for money
    Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.04 vs 7.1).
    6.04 vs 7.1
  • 2.54x more expensive
    Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (ÂŁ660 vs ÂŁ260).
    ÂŁ660 vs ÂŁ260
  • 10.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľâ–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Dell Xps 10 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.21 vs 8.000).
    7.21 vs 8
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 43% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 65 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (335 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    335 nits vs 400 nits
  • 66 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366Ă—768 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920Ă—1200.
    1366Ă—768 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    AGC Dragontrail Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3,640 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    3,640 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 29.6% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (635 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    635 g vs 490 g
  • 1.4 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.4 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.4 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 99.4 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (274.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    274.7 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 7 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    December 2012
    2012 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
28/01/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
10/04/2013
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
22/02/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
06/03/2013
Summary of the review
T
theregister.com
06/02/2013
Summary of the review
I
ibtimes.co.uk
18/02/2013
Summary of the review
B
bmmagazine.co.uk
25/03/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
22/02/2013
Summary of the review
A
accountingweb.co.uk
29/04/2013
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
13/02/2013
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
13/02/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
21/06/2013
Summary of the review
R
rp-online.de
31/07/2013
Summary of the review
P
prad.de
15/03/2013
Summary of the review
R
review-center.de
16/01/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/01/2013
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
07/02/2013
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
04/04/2013
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/01/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Exceptional battery life, reaching over 20 hours when used with the keyboard dock.
  • Highly portable and comfortable to hold due to its lightweight design and rounded edges.
  • Productive keyboard dock that includes additional ports and its own integrated battery.
  • Pleasant tactile feel provided by the soft-touch black plastic finish.
  • Convenient charging options, including the ability to trickle charge via micro-USB.

What customers don't like about Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Extremely limited app selection due to the Windows RT operating system.
  • Incompatibility with standard legacy Windows desktop applications.
  • Mediocre build quality of the tablet itself, with some users reporting creaking and flex in the rear casing.
  • Underwhelming screen resolution (1366 x 768) and lack of vibrancy compared to competitors.
  • Noticeable performance lag and sluggishness when opening programs or multitasking.
  • Keyboard and touchpad usability issues, including small keys and inconsistent responsiveness.

Verdict

The Dell XPS 10 is a 10.1-inch hybrid tablet featuring a 1366x768 resolution IPS touchscreen and running on the Windows RT operating system. It is powered by a dual-core 1.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 processor, 2GB of RAM, and 64GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a microSD slot. Its primary strengths include an exceptionally long battery life—offering up to 10 hours alone and over 20 hours when paired with its optional keyboard dock—as well as a premium soft-touch design and highly comfortable typing experience. However, it is hindered by the limitations of Windows RT, which cannot run traditional desktop (.exe) software, a restricted app ecosystem, and some reported build quality issues like chassis flex and creaking.

Compare Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Dell Xps 10 WiFi (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found