OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£410RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z2760

Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB)
5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

6.9

User score

▼Worse than 76% of tablets
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

▼Worse than 87%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 77%
6.9

User score

User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 87%
  • asus-vivotab-smart-2gb-64gb-wifi
asus-vivotab-smart-2gb-64gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.9

Camera

14%

4.7

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.3
User score
User score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

5.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.9
Popularity
Popularity
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models
Popularity:
Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 5.7 points, which is lower than 56% of Tablets.
5.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.3
RAM capacity
2 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 82.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2760
This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z2760 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 81.9% of tablets and equal to those in 1.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366×768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366×768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
155 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 155 ppi which is lower than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,750 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,750 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 51.7% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
9.5 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 61.5% of tablets and equal to that of 1.2% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
580 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 580 g which is heavier than 70.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 16.1% lower user score
    User score
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi
    the average tablet
    Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.89 vs 8.000).
    6.89 vs 8
  • 12.6% worse value for money
    Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.3 vs 7.1).
    6.3 vs 7.1
  • 57.7% more expensive
    Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£410 vs £260).
    £410 vs £260
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX545 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX545 vs Mali-G51
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 18% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (533 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    533 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 51 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    350 nits vs 401 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (800:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    800:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (350 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    350 nits vs 400 nits
  • 66 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1366×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 0.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 18.4% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (580 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    580 g vs 490 g
  • 1.7 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 87.2 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (262.5 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    262.5 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 6 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    January 2013
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
SSLFamilyDad
≈ estimated
11/02/2014
Long-term review · about 90 days of regular use
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi is a strong, versatile budget Windows tablet that clearly deserves its price.
8.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
20/02/2013
Hands-on review · display, battery, camera and keyboard tests
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi is impressive for the price, with a decent display, though you need a keyboard for typing.
7.0
UltrabookReview
≈ estimated
31/01/2013
Hands-on review · design, screen, performance and battery
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi suits buyers who need desktop Windows software on a tablet, but it is not for everyone.
9.0
Tablet-News.com
✓ explicit
09/01/2013
Full review · design, desktop Windows, Photoshop and accessories
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi does well across design, software and hardware, with a few reservations.
8.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
12/05/2013
Unboxing and first look · first impressions of setup and interface
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi looks like a better buy than a Surface RT, and early impressions are very positive.
9.0
Linus Tech Tips
≈ estimated
08/02/2013
First look · unboxing and first setup
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi is still a portable tablet with good battery life, and it runs any desktop program you choose.
8.0
BASIC thinking
≈ estimated
13/12/2012
Unboxing and first impressions · packaging, apps and camera
Verdict
Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi looks like a bargain worth watching, and early impressions are positive.
Overview video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
trustedreviews.com
10/01/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart Review - Trusted Reviews
U
uk.pcmag.com
15/02/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS Vivo Tab Smart ME400C - Review 2013 - PCMag UK
L
laptopmag.com
14/02/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS VivoTab Smart Review | Windows 8 Tablet Reviews
P
pocket-lint.com
16/04/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart - Pocket-lint
P
pcworld.com
05/04/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Asus VivoTab Smart offers full Windows 8 OS in hybrid - PCWorld(www.techradar.com) | March 19 2013 | Asus VivoTab Smart ME400 review - TechRad...
A
avforums.com
02/07/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart Windows 8 Tablet Review - AVForums
S
statetechmagazine.com
10/04/2013
Summary of the review
The ASUS VivoTab Supports Full Array of Windows 8 - StateTech
P
pcmag.com
21/02/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart ME400C Review
T
techradar.com
19/03/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart ME400 review
W
whosthemummy.co.uk
01/02/2013
Summary of the review
Review: The Asus VivoTab Smart
P
pcwelt.de
26/03/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart ME400C im Test, (www.netzwelt.de) | 07.03.2013 | Asus VivoTab Smart ME400C im Test: Windows-Tablet zum Kampfpreis, (www.chip.de) |...
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
10/04/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Vivo Tab Smart LTE im Test, (www.inside-digital.de) | 22.04.2013 | Asus VivoTab Smart ME400C im Test: Günstiges Windows-Tablet mit Ausdauer, (www...
(Translated)Show original
F
futurezone.at
18/02/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab: Kompaktes Windows-8-Gerät im Test. Detailed reviews and performance metrics for the device are available at these links.
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
17/07/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Vivo Tab Smart LTE - Tablets im Test - sehr gut - hifitest.de www.connect.de
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
06/03/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart in prova: il tablet “per tutti i giorni” | DDay.it
(Translated)Show original
S
saggiamente.com
18/05/2013
Summary of the review
Recensione: ASUS VivoTab Smart, un tablet per far girare Windows 8 | Saggiamente
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
23/12/2012
Summary of the review
Autonomia e prestazioni - Asus VivoTab Smart
(Translated)Show original
H
hwupgrade.it
05/04/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart: un tablet con Windows 8
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
07/03/2013
Summary of the review
Asus VivoTab Smart - Tom's Hardware
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
11/01/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS Vivo Tab Smart ME400C Windows 8 tablet te koop in Nederland
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Full Windows 8 experience allowing desktop software installation
  • Highly portable, thin, and lightweight design for a 10-inch device
  • Vibrant IPS display with excellent viewing angles
  • Competitive pricing compared to higher-end Windows tablets like the Surface Pro
  • Strong battery life, often lasting a full workday of 7 to 9 hours
  • Upgradable storage via a built-in microSD card slot
  • Includes helpful connectivity features like NFC and GPS

What customers don't like about Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Intel Atom processor can lead to sluggish performance and intermittent lag
  • Limited 2GB of RAM makes multitasking with multiple apps or browser tabs difficult
  • Poor speaker quality (low volume and tinny sound)
  • Lack of full-size USB ports or SD slots requires separate adapters
  • Plastic chassis feels less premium and is prone to scratches compared to metal rivals
  • The 1366x768 screen resolution results in slightly pixelated text compared to Retina displays
  • WiFi performance can be slow and lacks support for 5GHz bands

Verdict

The Asus VivoTab Smart WiFi (ME400C) is a 10.1-inch tablet featuring a dual-core Intel Atom Z2760 processor (1.8GHz), 2GB of RAM, and 64GB of eMMC storage, running a full 32-bit version of Windows 8. Its key characteristics include a slim 9.7mm profile, a lightweight 580g build, and a vibrant IPS display with a 1366 x 768 resolution and 178-degree viewing angles. Main pros include its competitive pricing for a full Windows experience, impressive 9.5-hour battery life, and high-quality cameras (8MP rear/2MP front) with NFC support. However, notable cons include the lack of full-sized USB and SD ports, a plastic construction that lacks a premium feel, and performance limitations when handling demanding desktop applications or intensive multitasking.

Compare Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Vivotab Smart WiFi (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found