OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon S4

Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 77% of tablets
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

3.9

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

5.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 73% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £350

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 16GB2GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

6.3

Camera

14%

3.9

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

5.3

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

5.4

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Process node
32 nm
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 82.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 75.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
226 ppi
Pixel density
226 ppi
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 226 ppi which is higher than that of 63.5% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
▲ Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
▼ Worse than 86% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.2 MP which is lower than in 86.3% of tablets and equal to that in 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,760 mAh
Battery capacity
6,760 mAh
▲ Better than 52% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,760 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 51.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8.3 hours
Battery life
8.3 hours
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8.3 hours, which is shorter than that of 71.4% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
580 g
Weight
580 g
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 580 g which is heavier than 70.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 1.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 320
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 320 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1304:1
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1304:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,304:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 320
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 320 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 320 vs Mali-G51
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    8
    ▲ Better than 68% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1304:1
    ▲ Better than 57% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1304:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,304:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Allows manual focus
    Manual focus
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 101 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    300 nits
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    3.0
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    3.0 vs 5.0
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 4.81x less popular
    Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 11.1% worse value for money
    Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.39 vs 7.1).
    6.39 vs 7.1
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    Process node
    32 nm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.5 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 38.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    400 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 43% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    8.5 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    8.5 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 101 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    300 nits
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • Narrower color gamut
    Color gamut
    NTSC
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet supports a narrower color gamut than the average tablet (NTSC vs sRGB). The average tablet covers sRGB color gamut.
    NTSC vs sRGB
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • 1.7 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8.3 hours
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8.3 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8.3 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    3.0
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    3.0 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 18.4% heavier
    Weight
    580 g
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (580 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    580 g vs 490 g
  • 1.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    September 2013
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
expertreviews.co.uk
09/10/2013
Summary of the review
Asus MemoPad FHD 10 Review - Expert Reviews
P
phonearena.com
03/02/2014
Summary of the review
Asus MeMo Pad FHD 10 Review (Mentions LTE/Qualcomm variant differences)
N
notebookcheck.net
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 - Notebookcheck.net External Reviews
H
hardwareluxx.de
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
25/11/2013
Summary of the review
Asus MemoPad FHD 10 LTE (ME302KL-1B047A) (Tablet-PC)
(Translated)Show original
H
hardwareluxx.de
30/08/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10 LTE im Nachtest
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
23/10/2013
Summary of the review
Test tablette Asus MeMo Pad FHD 10
(Translated)Show original
A
actu.meilleurmobile.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
Test Asus MeMo Pad FHD 10 - Meilleur Mobile
(Translated)Show original
L
lesandroides.net
26/01/2014
Summary of the review
Test : Asus Memo Pad FHD 10, une tablette fullHD à prix raisonnable
(Translated)Show original
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
23/10/2013
Summary of the review
[Topic Unique] Test Tablette Tactile : Asus MeMo Pad FHD 10
(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
29/08/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS MeMo Pad FHD 10 y MeMo Pad HD 7
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
24/10/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10, la recensione
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
15/02/2014
Summary of the review
Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 - Reviews Androidworld.nl
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
05/06/2013
Summary of the review
Asus Memo Pad FHD 10: Android-tablet met Intel Inside
(Translated)Show original
A
androidworld.nl
16/08/2013
Summary of the review
Review ASUS MeMO Pad FHD 10: full HD-tablet met aantrekkelijke prijs
(Translated)Show original
F
fwd.nl
27/12/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10 (ME302C)
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
12/09/2013
Summary of the review
ASUS Memo Pad FHD 10 review: 10-inch Full HD voor een prikkie
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
13/08/2013
Summary of the review
Kort testrapport Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 Tablet
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • High-resolution 1920x1200 IPS display with wide viewing angles
  • Lightweight and comfortable design with a grippy, matte-textured back
  • Includes useful connectivity options like a microSD card slot and micro-HDMI port
  • Competitive pricing for a 10-inch Full HD tablet
  • Solid audio quality via stereo speakers and SonicMaster technology
  • Minimal bloatware and useful pre-installed ASUS apps like 'Splendid' for color calibration

What we don't like about Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB)

  • Slow loading times for large apps and graphics-heavy games
  • The x86-based Intel Atom processor has compatibility issues with some Google Play games
  • Display is prone to heavy fingerprint smudging and has poor outdoor visibility
  • Battery life drops significantly (down to ~5 hours) when used at full brightness
  • Occasional lag when waking the device from sleep or using the power button
  • Lack of an LED flash for the rear-facing 5MP camera

Verdict

The Asus MeMO Pad FHD 10 4G (ME302KL) is a 10.1-inch Android tablet featuring a high-resolution 1920 x 1200 IPS display, 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal storage expandable via microSD. Unlike the Wi-Fi-only version, this 4G model typically utilizes a quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro processor to handle LTE connectivity. Its main strengths include a sharp screen with wide viewing angles, a lightweight 580g design with a grippy 'micro-weave' finish, and integrated SonicMaster stereo speakers for enhanced multimedia. However, notable drawbacks include its aging Android 4.2 software, a glossy screen prone to heavy smudging and glare, and a processor that can struggle with long load times for high-end 3D games.

Compare Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Memo Pad FHD 10 4G (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found