OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£45RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:?

Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

35%

5.2

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.2

Reviews score

10%

5.2

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 91% of tablets
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.3

Connectivity

8%

7.2

Software

5%

6.5

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

â–¼Worse than 81%
5.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

5.2

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.5

Popularity

Grades by review (22)
16 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 85%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £45
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 8GB

What reviewers say about the Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB)

Based on 16 · 6

Reviewers enjoy the easy access to Amazon content and good audio, but complain about tiny storage and a limited app store.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.8

Battery

12%

5.3

Connectivity

8%

7.2

Software

5%

6.5

Design

3%

6.9

Audio

5.2
Reviews score
5.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.1
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process, which is larger than 65.1% of tablets and equal to 17.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 16 GB of internal storage, which is less than 78.8% of tablets and equal to 14.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi, which is lower than 52% of tablets and equal to 3.7% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 93.6% of tablets and equal to 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 0.3 MP resolution, which is lower than 93% of tablets and equal to 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,500 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,500 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 92.5% of tablets and equal to 1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 10 W, which is slower than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 33.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 56.9% of tablets offer this.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Fire OS 8
This tablet uses the Fire OS 8 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 80.9%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
337 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 337 g, which is lighter than 85.3% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 31.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (337 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    337 g vs 490 g
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 33 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (433 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    433 nits vs 400 nits
  • 5.78x cheaper
    Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£45 vs £260).
    £45 vs £260
  • 47.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (128 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    128 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 5.78x cheaper
    Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£45 vs £260).
    £45 vs £260
  • 33 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (433 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    433 nits vs 400 nits
  • 31.2% lighter
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (337 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    337 g vs 490 g
  • 47.3 mm narrower
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (128 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    128 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 6 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 25.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    5.2

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    16 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.2 vs 7.0
  • 47% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 25.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    5.2

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    16 reviews: 12 with a printed score, 4 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.2 vs 7.0
  • 30.7% lower sentiment score
    5.2 vs 7.5
  • 6.2% worse value for money
    Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (7.11 vs 7.6).
    7.11 vs 7.55
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 5 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    October 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 14.1% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen
    This tablet has a smaller screen than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 50% slower touch response
    This tablet samples touch more slowly than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet samples touch at 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 4.7 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 47% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No fast charging
    This tablet does not support fast charging, while the average tablet does. 56.8% of tablets support fast charging.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    mixed use
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.4% slower charging
    This tablet charges slower than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire OS 8 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire OS 8 vs Android
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 2.6 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (10.6 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    10.6 mm vs 8 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
22/10/2014
Review · Family-friendly 7-inch tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is a family-friendly tablet with a practical operating system, but its flimsy plastic back and small storage let it down.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
07/11/2014
Hands-on review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 suits Amazon-service fans, but rival tablets at similar prices beat it in most other areas.
6.0
uk.pcmag.com
≈ estimated
06/10/2014
Hands-on review · Amazon tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is a niche device: an easy, cheap way to stream Amazon content over Wi-Fi, but most rival tablets do more.
7.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
10/11/2014
Benchmark review · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 suits Prime members who mainly watch, read and browse, but its plastic build and weak gaming limit it.
7.0
avforums.com
✓ explicit
05/03/2015
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 offers better-than-expected performance for the money, but cramped 8GB storage and poor cameras hold it back.
7.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
21/10/2014
Hands-on test · Rival comparison
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is easy to use and fine for basic browsing, but the Tesco Hudl 2 is the better buy.
8.0
uk.pcmag.com
≈ estimated
16/05/2014
Hands-on review · Content tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 suits people who want Amazon's content with little fuss, but the Nexus 7 remains the better 7-inch tablet.
8.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
11/09/2012
Review · Budget 7-inch tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 has a bright screen and loud speakers, and suits anyone who buys movies, music and books from Amazon.
8.5
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
06/11/2012
Lab test · Amazon-only tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 has a bright outdoor screen and an easy interface, but its Amazon-only software and average hardware suit Amazon fans only.
8.0
digit.in
≈ estimated
01/07/2013
Hands-on review · Amazon-only tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 has a well-built body and a sharp, colour-rich screen, but its locked-down Amazon software and missing GPS limit it.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
16/10/2014
Hands-on review · Family tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is simple enough for young children and Amazon Prime households, but its bulky body and small storage struggle against rivals.
9.5
goodereader.com
✓ explicit
28/09/2012
Hands-on review · Reading and sound
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 has very loud stereo sound, responsive performance and strong Wi-Fi, but many services don't work outside the US.
6.0
connect.de
✓ explicit
12/12/2014
Lab test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is a sturdy tablet with decent performance, neither good nor bad, and its display is weaker than its predecessor's.
8.0
liseuses.net
≈ estimated
11/09/2015
Hands-on test · Amazon tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is a comfortable, sturdy tablet for Amazon content, but its unfamiliar interface and short streaming battery take getting used to.
7.0
smartworld.it
✓ explicit
07/11/2014
Hands-on review · Content tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 suits anyone already buying Amazon films, music and books, thanks to its simple interface and good battery life, but it lacks Google apps.
8.5
notebookcheck.nl
✓ explicit
12/01/2013
Lab test · Amazon-only tablet
Verdict
The Amazon Fire HD 7 is built to sell you Amazon products, suiting Prime members, but its closed software and modest power trail Android rivals.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Incredibly affordable price point, often cited as the best value for a basic budget tablet.
  • Solid battery life, with the 2022 model offering roughly 10 hours of video playback.
  • Compact and lightweight design, making it highly portable for travel and reading.
  • Includes a microSD card slot for expandable storage up to 1TB.
  • Durable build quality, especially the Kids Edition which includes a rugged protective case.
  • Seamless integration with Amazon services like Kindle, Prime Video, and hands-free Alexa.
  • Transition to USB-C charging in recent models for better compatibility.

What customers don't like about Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB)

  • Sluggish and underpowered performance, frequently experiencing lag when switching apps or loading web pages.
  • Sub-HD screen resolution (1024 x 600) with low brightness that is difficult to see in direct sunlight.
  • Limited app selection due to the lack of the official Google Play Store and many popular apps (e.g., YouTube, Google Maps).
  • Very slow charging times, often taking over 4 hours for a full charge with the included 5W adapter.
  • Low-quality 2MP cameras that produce grainy, washed-out images and are only suitable for basic video calls.
  • Base models include intrusive advertisements on the lock screen unless you pay an extra fee to remove them.
  • Limited internal storage on base models (16GB), much of which is consumed by the operating system.

Verdict

The Amazon Fire 7 (9th Generation, 2019) is an entry-level budget tablet featuring a 7-inch IPS display with a 1024 x 600 resolution (171 ppi), a 1.3 GHz quad-core processor, 1GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal storage. Its primary strengths are its extreme affordability, durable plastic build, and deep integration with Amazon services like Alexa, Prime Video, and Kindle, making it a popular choice for children or basic media consumption. It also includes a microSD slot for expanding storage up to 512GB and a 3.5mm headphone jack. However, users often experience sluggish performance during multitasking, a lower-quality non-HD screen, mediocre 2MP cameras, and the lack of native Google Play Store support, which limits the available app selection.

Compare Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Fire HD 7 (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found