OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£480RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 3

Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 22 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components

35%

5.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.4

Reviews score

10%

5.4

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 86% of tablets
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 95%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

5.8

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 76%
5.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

5.4

Mark 7.3 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.0

Average grade

20%

8.5

Popularity

Grades by review (22)
17 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 81%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £480
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
1GB + 32GB1GB + 16GB

What reviewers say about the Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB)

Based on 17 · 7

Reviewers praise the display and battery life, but criticise the camera and gaming; opinions on speed and build are split.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

22%

4.4

Performance

20%

6.0

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

5.8

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software

5%

4.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.4
Reviews score
5.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 3
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 3, which is less advanced than 64.8% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83.1% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi, which is higher than 50.1% of tablets and equal to 11.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1 MP resolution, which is lower than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 1.3% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
9,800 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 9,800 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 86.5% of tablets and equal to 0.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
665 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 665 g, which is heavier than 85% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 48.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (9,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    9,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • 48.5% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (9,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    9,800 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 4 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.3 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    17 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 22.9% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models

    5.4

    Mark 7.3 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.0

    Average grade

    20%

    8.5

    Popularity

    Grades by review (22)
    17 reviews: 14 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 5 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.4 vs 7.0
  • 28.0% lower sentiment score
    5.4 vs 7.5
  • 14.5% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.59 vs 7.6).
    6.59 vs 7.55
  • 84.6% more expensive
    Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£480 vs £260).
    £480 vs £260
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    4 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 64.4% less memory bandwidth
    This tablet has less memory bandwidth than the average tablet (5.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    5.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 7 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    June 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 20% slower GPU clock
    This tablet runs its GPU slower than the average tablet (520 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet runs its GPU at 650 MHz.
    520 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 91 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (309 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    309 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less vivid contrast
    This tablet has less contrast than the average tablet (800:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    800:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 4 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5).
    2.1 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 35.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (665 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    665 g vs 490 g
  • 3 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    11 mm vs 8 mm
  • 59 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (259 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    259 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.9
theverge.com
✓ explicit
29/06/2012
Hands-on review · 1080p tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has a very sharp screen, but its dull design and Nexus 7 competition make it hard to recommend.
6.5
cnet.com
✓ explicit
02/07/2012
Lab test · High-res tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has a sharp screen and comfortable grip, but its processor can't keep up, causing stutters and occasional freezes.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
12/07/2012
Lab test · Quad-core tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has a sharp screen and USB support for keyboards and drives, but its clunky build and few apps for its resolution hold it back.
6.0
gizmodo.com
✓ explicit
16/07/2012
Hands-on test · Movie-watching tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has a pretty screen for movies, but its extra pixels slow it down, and laggy touch makes it probably not worth buying.
7.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
16/07/2012
Hands-on test · USB host tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a sharp 10-inch tablet with loud speakers and USB host for accessories, but dated looks and laggy touch hold it back.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
20/07/2012
Hands-on review · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a good video tablet with a sharp screen and long battery life, but glare and occasional missed taps are its main drawbacks.
6.0
techspot.com
✓ explicit
10/08/2012
Detailed review · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has accurate colors and a sharp screen, but a dim panel, laggy interface and stuttering games make it a poor choice for gamers.
7.0
hothardware.com
✓ explicit
03/10/2012
Feature review · Android tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 comes loaded with preinstalled apps, but its camera struggles in dim rooms.
5.0
eurogamer.net
≈ estimated
06/11/2012
Gaming-focused review · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has a very good screen, but its weaker Tegra 3 chip makes games and menus stutter, so it is hard to pick over rivals.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
14/11/2012
Detailed review · Android tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a competent Android tablet with a sharp screen and easy transfers, but its plastic build and reflective display hold it back.
6.0
laptopmag.com
✓ explicit
27/06/2012
Lab-tested review · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a sharp Full HD tablet with long battery life, but it runs hot and is chunkier than its rivals.
8.2
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
07/09/2012
Lab test · Tegra 3 tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 has an IPS-like screen and fine everyday speed, but reflections and stutters in games and scrolling hold it back.
7.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
22/10/2012
Lab test · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a sharp-screened, long-lasting Android tablet for movies, though its weight and missing cables count against it.
8.0
hardwareluxx.de
≈ estimated
14/05/2013
Full review · High-res Android tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is Acer's best Android tablet, with a rare high-res screen, though its pixel density trails the iPad's.
7.0
hifitest.de
✓ explicit
18/04/2013
Comparison test · Multimedia tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a solid multimedia tablet that plays nearly all video and audio formats in full HD, though its price is steep.
6.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
11/09/2012
Hands-on test · Full HD tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a well-built Full HD tablet with a good screen, but its weight, lack of 3G and occasional stutter in games hold it back.
6.0
tweakers.net
✓ explicit
24/09/2012
Benchmark review · Tegra 3 tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a Full HD sibling of the A510 whose slower Tegra 3 chip and memory may struggle with its Full HD screen.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB)

  • High-resolution 1920x1200 'Full HD' display with sharp text and vivid colors
  • Excellent battery life for all-day use, with some users reporting over 6-9 hours of continuous video or gaming
  • Practical connectivity options including a micro-HDMI port and a microSD slot for storage expansion up to 64GB
  • Comfortable to hold due to a rubberized, textured back that provides a secure grip
  • Better-than-average stereo speakers with Dolby Mobile support

What customers don't like about Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB)

  • Performance stutters and occasional hangs, particularly during 3D gaming or rapid navigation, as the Tegra 3 processor struggles with the high pixel density
  • The tablet can become noticeably warm during demanding tasks like gaming
  • Mediocre camera quality with grainy, dull images and no LED flash
  • The glossy screen is highly reflective, making it difficult to use in direct sunlight
  • Awkward placement of the charging/USB port on the bottom edge (in landscape mode), which can interfere with use while plugged in

Verdict

The Acer Iconia Tab A700 is a 10.1-inch Android tablet distinguished as one of the first to feature a Full HD 1920 x 1200 resolution display, powered by an NVIDIA Tegra 3 quad-core processor (1.3 GHz) with 1GB of RAM and 32GB of internal storage. Its standout characteristics include a high pixel density of 224 PPI for sharp text, 3G connectivity in the A701 variant, and a substantial 9800 mAh battery that supports approximately 8 to 10 hours of video playback. Main pros involve the crisp, high-resolution screen suitable for HD media, the inclusion of micro-HDMI and microSD expansion (up to 64GB), and a comfortable rubberized back for a secure grip. However, notable cons include sluggish performance and occasional stuttering as the processor struggles to drive the high-resolution display, a relatively heavy and thick chassis, and mediocre 5MP rear and 1MP front cameras that lack an LED flash and perform poorly in low light.

Compare Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia Tab A700 3G (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found