OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 2 T20

Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 33 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

35%

4.6

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.6

Reviews score

10%

9.2

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 88% of tablets
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 95%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

4.3

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.7

Software

5%

4.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 97%
4.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

4.6

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.5

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (33)
24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 98%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
  • acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
acer-iconia-tab-a500-32gb-1gb-32gb-3g
Where to buy
    N/A~ £440
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)

Based on 24 · 9

Reviewers praise the ports, dock and quick performance, but find it heavy and bulky, with a glossy screen prone to glare.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)

Based on 104 owners sharing their experience in online comments

67%positive9%mixed24%negative

Owners prize its flexibility, ports, and value, while crashes, slowing performance, and boot failures are the main frustrations.

What owners dislike

  • Apps often force close or freeze mid-use, especially games and the browser; closing background apps helps reduce crashes.9
  • It slows down over time and starts lagging when the home screen has many live wallpapers, widgets and apps.7
  • Some tablets get stuck on the Acer logo and never start, or show a message that the system was interrupted after a modification procedure.6
  • Owners say it is heavier than an iPad, about a kilo, and wish for a smaller, lighter option.5
  • The charger uses an unusual proprietary plug and its cable is short, about three feet, and replacement chargers are hard to find.4
  • Video playback buffers or struggles4
  • External drives work only in FAT32 unless the tablet is rooted, and some owners had a USB port that stopped working.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

22%

4.1

Performance

20%

4.3

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.8

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.7

Software

5%

4.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

4.6
Reviews score
4.6
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
1 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 1 GB of RAM, which is less than 78% of tablets and equal to 19.1% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 2 T20
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 2 T20, which is less advanced than 70.5% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1280×800
This tablet has a 1280×800 screen, which is less sharp than 68.1% of tablets and equal to 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi, which is lower than 86.8% of tablets and equal to 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet protects its screen with Corning Gorilla Glass, which is more durable than 45.4% of tablets and the same as 32.8% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 5 MP resolution, which is lower than 63.7% of tablets and equal to 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 2 MP resolution, which is lower than 53.8% of tablets and equal to 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.8, which is narrower than 89.6% of tablets and equal to 3.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
3,260 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 3,260 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 94.8% of tablets and equal to 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 18 W, which is faster than 48% of tablets and equal to 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
?
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
730 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 730 g, which is heavier than 89.5% of tablets and equal to 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1340:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,340:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 22.7% higher sentiment score
    9.2 vs 7.5
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • 22.7% higher sentiment score
    9.2 vs 7.5
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 2 T20 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (8 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    8 vs 4
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (1340:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    1,340:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • Supports cellular data
    This tablet supports cellular data, while the average tablet does not. 47.4% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 34.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (33)
    24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.6 vs 7.0
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 50.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,260 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,260 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 34.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models

    4.6

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (33)
    24 reviews: 15 with a printed score, 9 estimated from the review. 9 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.6 vs 7.0
  • 13.9% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.63 vs 7.6).
    6.63 vs 7.55
  • 69.2% more expensive
    Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£440 vs £260).
    £440 vs £260
  • 6 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has fewer CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 8). The average tablet has 8 CPU threads.
    2 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 50% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 1,466 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not support big.LITTLE architecture, while the average tablet does. 51.7% of tablets support big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 8 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    April 2011
    2011 vs 2019
  • More basic memory type
    This tablet uses less advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR2 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 32.6% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 59 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (342 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    342 nits vs 401 nits
  • 95 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (305 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    305 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200).
    1,280×800 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 3 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3 MP lower rear resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not support manual white balance, while the average tablet does. 51.5% of tablets support manual white balance.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    This tablet has a narrower main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.8 vs f/2.2
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 50.6% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (3,260 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    3,260 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (2.1 vs 5).
    2.1 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average of independent expert reviews and videos, graded by us; missing reviews count as 7/10.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how independent test sites and video reviewers rate the product in real use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, while the average tablet does. 73.8% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy
    This tablet does not support location privacy, while the average tablet does. 76.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 49% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (730 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    730 g vs 490 g
  • 5.3 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (13.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    13.3 mm vs 8 mm
  • 60 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (260 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    260 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
InfinitelyGalactic
≈ estimated
05/12/2011
Hands-on review · ports, software and app tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G is great value at its price and still an excellent choice despite a few drawbacks.
8.0
Mrwhosetheboss
≈ estimated
28/08/2011
Hands-on review · gaming and performance tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G is a good tablet with strong games and graphics, worth buying though it can feel laggy.
6.0
UltrabookReview
≈ estimated
16/05/2011
Hands-on review part 1 · video playback and media tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G plays standard video and YouTube well, but HD video format support is limited.
7.0
butterscotchcom
≈ estimated
09/05/2011
Hands-on review · screen, hardware and game tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G is a capable Android tablet with a cheap-feeling build and few games tuned for its chip yet.
8.0
Laptop Mag
≈ estimated
18/04/2011
First impressions · design, audio, camera and Wi-Fi tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G is pleasant to use with no lag so far, with a full review still to come.
9.0
BASIC thinking
≈ estimated
06/04/2011
First look · pre-release unit, app and game tests
Verdict
Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G makes a good first impression: well built, strong for gaming, and more enjoyable than its rival.
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
26/05/2011
Hands-on review · Multimedia tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a sturdy, bright tablet for 720p video, but its bulkier design and shorter battery life leave it behind the Motorola Xoom.
7.0
mobiletechreview.com
≈ estimated
30/04/2011
Hands-on review · Affordable tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is an attractive, well-equipped Android tablet with lots of value, but early glitches and weak 1080p playback hold it back.
8.5
notebookcheck.net
✓ explicit
27/05/2011
Lab test · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a solid tablet with a high-contrast screen and quick hardware, but it trails the iPad in games and sound.
7.0
cnet.com
✓ explicit
21/04/2011
Full review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 packs a full-size USB port, HDMI and Android 3 at a reasonable price, but it is thick and heavy for a tablet.
7.0
uk.pcmag.com
✓ explicit
16/09/2011
Lab test · Media tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 suits media fans, with plenty of ports and TV output, but its tinny speakers and off-center front camera hold it back.
7.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
20/06/2011
Full review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 looks like every other Honeycomb tablet, with a nice screen and good connections, but its plain, generic design lets it down.
8.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
16/04/2013
Full review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 has the USB and microSD slots most rivals lack, but its clunky design and weak video support hold it back.
5.0
techlicious.com
✓ explicit
23/05/2011
Full review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a solid budget Android option with a bright screen and full USB port, but Honeycomb still has glitches and few tablet apps.
9.0
rayazmuthalif.wordpress.com
≈ estimated
19/11/2011
Owner's review · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a well-built, powerful Honeycomb tablet suited to business use, but it is hard to see in direct sunlight.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
26/05/2011
Hands-on test · Media playback
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 has a sharp screen for photos and music, but movies lag at times and you cannot rent films, so you must load your own.
phonearena.com
05/05/2011
Not graded yet
8.5
notebookcheck.com
✓ explicit
20/05/2011
Lab test · Android tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a quiet, solid tablet with a bright, high-contrast screen, but its reflective glass is hard to use in daylight.
6.9
computerwoche.de
✓ explicit
12/08/2011
Lab test · Home tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia A500 is a good-value home tablet with many ports and fast browsing, but slow touch response and no 3G hold it back.
7.2
computerbild.de
✓ explicit
07/07/2011
Short test · Port-rich tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 offers plenty of ports, but no mobile data and a separate charger limit how mobile it is.
7.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
11/05/2011
Hands-on test · Android tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is fast with a bright, sharp screen, but it won't play common video formats until a promised update.
8.0
journaldugeek.com
≈ estimated
02/05/2011
Hands-on test · Multimedia tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is a fast, well-equipped early Honeycomb tablet at an attractive price, but its weight, weak speakers and mains-only charging hold it back.
7.0
frandroid.com
≈ estimated
16/04/2014
Hands-on test · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 suits home use, where its large screen makes the lack of 3G easier to live with.
5.0
clubic.com
✓ explicit
04/05/2011
Hands-on test · Honeycomb tablet
Verdict
The Acer Iconia A500 has solid connectivity and tablet-friendly home screens, but its 756g weight and USB host that ignores mice hold it back.
8.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
29/04/2011
Lab test · Screen and build
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 has a high-contrast screen with wide viewing angles, but its colours are inaccurate and a newer Iconia model has overtaken it.
7.0
lesandroides.net
≈ estimated
27/04/2018
Hands-on test · Ports and battery
Verdict
The Acer Iconia Tab A500 is an honest, well-equipped tablet with good value for money, though it is thick and heavy and its battery life falls short of claims.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)

  • Plentiful connectivity options including full-size USB host, micro-USB, and micro-HDMI ports
  • Competitive and affordable pricing compared to rivals like the iPad 2 and Motorola Xoom
  • Solid build quality with a durable brushed aluminum back
  • Functional microSD card slot for easy storage expansion
  • Good audio performance enhanced by Dolby Mobile software
  • Bright and crisp 10.1-inch display with decent viewing angles

What customers don't like about Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB)

  • Noticeably heavy and bulky, making it uncomfortable to hold for long periods
  • Glossy screen is highly reflective and difficult to view in direct sunlight
  • Mediocre camera performance with grainy images and washed-out colors
  • Inconsistent battery life that often trails behind top competitors
  • Software experience can be buggy with occasional app crashes and freezes
  • Included charging cable is considered too short for convenient use

Verdict

The Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G is a 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 WXGA capacitive multi-touch display and a durable aluminium casing. It is powered by a 1GHz NVIDIA Tegra 250 dual-core processor with 1GB of DDR2 RAM and 32GB of internal flash storage, expandable via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include extensive connectivity options such as a full-sized USB 2.0 host port, micro-USB, and micro-HDMI, alongside a 5MP rear camera with LED flash and a 2MP front-facing camera. Main pros are its versatile port selection, solid build quality, and smooth performance for multimedia and gaming. However, its significant cons include a relatively heavy and bulky design, a highly reflective screen that is difficult to view in direct sunlight, and mediocre camera image quality.

Compare Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia Tab A500 3G (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found