OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Smartwatches Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Smartwatches Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v3.0

Vector Luna review: 127 specs compared

Avg. price:~£360Screen size:1.20 inchBattery life:30 daysDisplay type:MIP LCD

Vector Luna Review: Compare 127 technical specifications and 20 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

Vector Luna
5.3/10

Overall score

Score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

35%

4.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

4.4

Reviews score

10%

4.4

Sentiment score

â–¼Worse than 98% of smartwatches
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
4.4

Technical score

Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

24%

2.0

Health

21%

5.5

Fitness

16%

6.7

Battery

14%

4.5

Smart features

12%

2.4

Connectivity

9%

5.9

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 95%
4.4

Reviews score

Reviews score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

4.4

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

7.8

Average grade

20%

8.1

Popularity

Grades by review (20)
17 reviews + 3 videos, average 7.8/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 96%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • vector-luna
  • vector-luna
  • vector-luna
  • vector-luna
vector-luna
vector-luna
vector-luna
vector-luna
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Vector Luna

Based on 11 · 4

Reviewers love the design and battery life, but find it bulky, light on features and awkward to control; notifications divide opinion.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Vector Luna

Technical score
Technical score
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

24%

2.0

Health

21%

5.5

Fitness

16%

6.7

Battery

14%

4.5

Smart features

12%

2.4

Connectivity

9%

5.9

Display & Design

4%

5.7

Hardware

4.4
Reviews score
4.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

5.3

Overall score

30%

8.6

Price

6.3
Heart rate monitor
no
This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor. 90.7% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
no
This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring. 69.7% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 18.2% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
HRV tracking
no
This smartwatch does not support HRV tracking. 45.2% of smartwatches support HRV tracking.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.5% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 71.3% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 32.9% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 3.7% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
30 days
Market range: <1 day – >20 days
This smartwatch lasts 30 days on a charge, which is longer than 95.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 1% of Smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
220 mAh
Market range: <200 mAh – >500 mAh
This smartwatch has a 220 mAh battery, which is smaller than 81.9% of Smartwatches and the same as 1.5% of Smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges from empty in 120 min, which is quicker than 13.3% of Smartwatches and the same as 44.6% of Smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 120 minutes.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Proprietary OS
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS, which is less advanced than the system in 54.2% of Smartwatches and equal to 42% of Smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 46.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 53.9% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
yes
This smartwatch supports third-party apps. 48.5% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Support is limited to official app stores/approved app selection.
Notifications
yes
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 69.3% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 16.7% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 59.8% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 43.6% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Dual-frequency GPS
no
This smartwatch does not support dual-frequency GPS. 15.1% of Smartwatches offer this.
Show more
Screen size
1.2 inch
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.83 inch
This smartwatch has a 1.2 inch screen, which is smaller than 84.6% of Smartwatches and the same as 8.1% of Smartwatches.
Display type
MIP LCD
This smartwatch uses MIP LCD, which is less advanced than the screen in 62.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 5.7% of Smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 240
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240 which is lower than that of 75.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 14.1% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
283 ppi
Market range: <213 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 283 ppi, which is lower than 67.1% of Smartwatches and equal to 4.5% of Smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch has 0 GB of internal storage, which is less than 76.5% of Smartwatches and equal to 23.5% of Smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Vector Luna vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 23 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (30 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    30 days vs 7 days
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, stainless steel vs silicone
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    316L stainless steel case
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 23 days longer battery life
    This smartwatch runs longer per charge than the average smartwatch (30 days vs 7 days). The average smartwatch runs for 7 days on a charge.
    30 days vs 7 days
  • Better band material
    This smartwatch uses silicone, leather, stainless steel for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    silicone, leather, stainless steel vs silicone
  • Better case material
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    316L stainless steel case
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 37.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

    4.4

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    17 reviews + 3 videos, average 7.8/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.4 vs 7.0
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No heart rate monitor
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 90.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • 37.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    4.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Every review counts the same: written or video, short or full test.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models

    4.4

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 7.9 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    7.8

    Average grade

    20%

    8.1

    Popularity

    Grades by review (20)
    17 reviews + 3 videos, average 7.8/10. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    4.4 vs 7.0
  • 41.3% lower sentiment score
    4.4 vs 7.5
  • 23% worse value for money
    Vector Luna has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.31 vs 7.8).
    6.31 vs 7.76
  • 3.27x more expensive
    Vector Luna is more expensive than the average smartwatch (£360 vs £110).
    £360 vs £110
  • No VO2 max measurement
    This smartwatch does not measure VO2 max, the average smartwatch does. 51.3% of smartwatches measure VO2 max.
  • No blood oxygen monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support blood oxygen monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 69.6% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
  • No irregular heart rate alerts
    This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings, the average smartwatch does. 50.6% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
  • No stress monitoring
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 68.7% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No heart rate monitor
    This smartwatch does not include a heart rate monitor, the average smartwatch does. 90.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
  • No cycle tracking
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 66.8% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No smart scale support
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • 6 years older
    This smartwatch was released earlier than the average smartwatch (2015 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    September 2015
    2015 vs 2021
  • No multi-sport mode
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 71.7% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 81.8% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No barometer
    This smartwatch does not include a barometer, the average smartwatch does. 53.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • No route tracking
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 77% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 58.8% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 71.2% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No auto-pause
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 62.6% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No swim mode
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 76.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No route support
    This smartwatch does not support route support, the average smartwatch does. 54.4% of smartwatches support route support.
  • No achievement tracking
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 87% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No voice feedback
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 63.5% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • No exercise tagging
    This smartwatch does not support exercise tagging, the average smartwatch does. 94.2% of smartwatches support exercise tagging.
  • 85 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery than the average smartwatch (220 mAh vs 305 mAh). The average smartwatch has a 305 mAh battery.
    220 mAh vs 305 mAh
  • No battery indicator
    This smartwatch does not include a battery level indicator, the average smartwatch does. 97.8% of smartwatches include a battery level indicator.
  • No GPS support
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 59.7% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 56.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Less current Bluetooth version
    This smartwatch uses a less current Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4 vs 5).
    4 vs 5
  • 48.5 m shallower water rating
    This smartwatch is rated for shallower water than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch is rated to 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 112 g heavier
    This smartwatch is heavier than the average smartwatch (157 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45 g.
    157 g vs 45 g
  • More basic display
    This smartwatch uses a more basic screen than the average smartwatch (MIP LCD vs AMOLED).
    MIP LCD vs AMOLED
  • 0.2 inch smaller display
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen than the average smartwatch (1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch has a 1.4 inch screen.
    1.2 inch vs 1.4 inch
  • Lower resolution
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 360x360.
    240x240 vs 360x360
  • No touchscreen
    This smartwatch does not have a touch screen, the average smartwatch does. 91.5% of smartwatches have a touch screen.
  • 43 ppi less sharp screen
    This smartwatch has a less sharp screen than the average smartwatch (283 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch has a pixel density of 326 ppi.
    283 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • No music playback
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 57.1% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 69.2% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 60% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 68.1% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 70.4% of smartwatches include passcode protection.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Geekanoids
≈ estimated
13/02/2016
Hands-on review · design, battery, watch faces and display
Verdict
Vector Luna has a well-made design and a readable display, but its battery falls short of the advertised 30 days.
9.0
Marius Dan Tite
≈ estimated
06/02/2016
Hands-on review · unboxing, design, app and reliability
Verdict
Vector Luna feels solid and has a simple app, but notification and connection problems and missing features hold it back.
8.0
Bogdan ABR
≈ estimated
09/02/2016
Hands-on review · design, app and always-on display
Verdict
Vector Luna is a simple, good-looking watch that holds up in daily use, but the high price is hard to justify.
Not graded
Shop video
Shop video
Shop video
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
digitaltrends.com
✓ explicit
26/04/2022
Long-term test · Monochrome watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna keeps time all day and lasts about a month, suiting people who want notifications without frequent charging.
9.0
windowscentral.com
≈ estimated
16/11/2016
Long-term test · Button-driven watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna lasts a month and shows notifications well, but its Windows Phone app is unreliable.
9.0
androidheadlines.com
≈ estimated
01/11/2016
Hands-on review · Simple daily watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a simple, well-made watch that lasts about a month and suits buyers who want only notifications and basic fitness tracking.
6.0
wareable.com
≈ estimated
23/11/2015
Hands-on test · Basic watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna has a 30-day battery and a handy calendar face, but its grainy screen and flaky notifications hold it back.
6.0
techadvisor.com
✓ explicit
13/10/2015
Expert review · Retro-style watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a stylish watch with a month-long battery, but its retro display, few apps and weak fitness tracking hold it back.
7.0
pocket-lint.com
✓ explicit
13/08/2015
Review · Long-battery monochrome watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna Watch suits people who want a discreet, good-looking watch that lasts 30 days, but it does little beyond simple alerts.
6.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
28/08/2015
Three-week review · Stylish but limited
Verdict
The Vector Luna is one of the most stylish smartwatches around, but its limited apps and button-only controls hold it back.
8.0
cnet.com
≈ estimated
19/03/2015
Hands-on test · Classic-style watch with long battery life
Verdict
The Vector Luna looks like a classic watch and promises 30 days on a charge, but its side buttons have yet to be tested on busy streets.
6.0
ibtimes.co.uk
✓ explicit
20/08/2015
Review · Simple, long-battery watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a stylish watch that lasts a month, but its low-resolution screen and glitchy software hold it back.
8.0
digitalcitizen.life
✓ explicit
30/09/2015
Hands-on review · Fashion-style watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a stylish, durable watch that catches notifications reliably, but it's large and heavy and has few extra features.
7.0
pocnetwork.net
✓ explicit
05/10/2016
Hands-on review · Cross-platform watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a stylish, long-lasting watch best suited to Android and iOS users, while Windows owners will find its app lacking.
8.0
digitalcitizen.life
✓ explicit
30/09/2015
Hands-on review · Fashion-style watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a stylish, durable watch that catches notifications reliably, but it's large and heavy and has few extra features.
9.0
pocketpc.ch
≈ estimated
10/04/2016
Hands-on test · Classic-look smartwatch
Verdict
The Vector Luna is a classic-looking watch with a high-contrast monochrome screen and 20 to 25 days of battery, but its activity counts run about 10% below rivals.
8.0
01net.com
✓ explicit
20/04/2016
Hands-on test · Long-battery watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna lasts a full month on a charge, but its dated 240 x 240 black-and-white screen and slow app hold it back.
9.0
socialandtech.net
≈ estimated
16/12/2016
Quick review · Stylish daily watch
Verdict
The Vector Luna looks good and lasts about 20 days in normal use, but its screen is hard to read in strong sunlight.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Vector Luna

  • Exceptional 30-day battery life that can often reach 40-50 days on a single charge
  • Stylish, premium design that resembles a traditional high-end timepiece rather than a gadget
  • High build quality with a solid stainless steel body and water resistance up to 50m
  • Cross-platform compatibility with official apps for iOS, Android, and Windows Phone
  • Always-on monochrome display that remains legible even in direct sunlight
  • Subtle, discrete notification system that preserves privacy by requiring a wrist tilt to view content
  • Unique calendar visualization that displays appointments as markers around the watch face perimeter

What customers don't like about Vector Luna

  • Low-resolution monochrome screen that lacks colour and can appear dark or 'jagged'
  • Very limited third-party app ecosystem with many promised apps never materializing
  • Lack of a touchscreen; all interactions depend on three physical side buttons
  • Non-interactive notifications that only allow viewing snippets without the ability to reply
  • Inaccurate or basic fitness and sleep tracking that lacks a heart rate monitor and GPS
  • Large, chunky physical profile (44mm wide, 12mm thick) that may be too big for smaller wrists
  • Weak backlight that only stays on for a few seconds, making it difficult to read in the dark
  • Syncing and connectivity issues, particularly reported with the Windows Phone app

Verdict

The Vector Luna is a premium 44mm or 46mm stainless steel smartwatch defined by its industry-leading 30-day battery life and an always-on, high-contrast monochrome LCD. Crafted with a 316L stainless steel case and mineral glass, it features 5ATM water resistance, a built-in accelerometer, and a gyroscope for basic activity and sleep tracking. The device uses three physical side buttons for navigation instead of a touchscreen, providing 'glanceable' notifications and customizable information 'streams' like weather and calendar alerts across iOS, Android, and Windows platforms. Main pros include its exceptional endurance, elegant traditional watch aesthetic, and excellent sunlight legibility. However, its significant cons include a dim backlight, a low-resolution display with limited viewing angles, a bulky 11-12mm thickness, and a sparse ecosystem of third-party apps.

Compare Vector Luna with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Vector Luna and other Smartwatches

No results found