OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Noise Colorfit Ultra Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Screen size:1.75 inchBattery life:9 daysDisplay type:LCD

Noise Colorfit Ultra Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 10 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

4.8

Technical score

30%

7.1

Review score ( 6 · 4)

Review score 30% · 7.1 · based on 10 independent reviews
Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. This model has enough reviews, so its review score is the weighted average of their grades.
â–¼Worse than 90% of smartwatches
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

24%

5.0

Health

21%

5.2

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

3.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.0

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 89% of smartwatches
7.1

Review score

Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Grades by review (10)
6 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
5

15.6%

7.0

techradar.com

12.5%

7.8

themobileindian.com

12.5%

7.0

indianexpress.com

12.5%

7.0

indiatoday.in

12.5%

5.6

geekman.in

Video reviews 4

6.3%

9.0

Tech Singh

6.3%

9.0

Tech Unboxing

6.3%

7.0

Vimal Chintapatla

3.1%

8.0

Gadget Gig

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 80% of smartwatches
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
  • noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra
noise-colorfit-ultra

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Noise Colorfit Ultra

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

24%

5.0

Health

21%

5.2

Fitness

16%

6.2

Battery

14%

3.8

Smart features

12%

2.6

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.0

Hardware

4.8
Review score
Review score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Grades by review (10)
6 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Text reviews 5
✓ explicit
5

15.6%

7.0

techradar.com

12.5%

7.8

themobileindian.com

12.5%

7.0

indianexpress.com

12.5%

7.0

indiatoday.in

12.5%

5.6

geekman.in

Video reviews 4

6.3%

9.0

Tech Singh

6.3%

9.0

Tech Unboxing

6.3%

7.0

Vimal Chintapatla

3.1%

8.0

Gadget Gig

estimated from the review
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartwatch.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 88% of models
Popularity:
Noise Colorfit Ultra has a popularity of 9.2 points, which is higher than 87.6% of smartwatches.
9.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.9
Brand name
Noise
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Distance tracking may depend on phone GPS/app on some models.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery life
9 days
Battery life
9 days
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 9 days which is longer than that of 60.3% of smartwatches and equal to that of 2.6% of smartwatches.
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
300 mAh
Battery power
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 300 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 44.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 6.7% of smartwatches.
Charge time
115 min
Charge time
115 min
â–² Better than 58% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 115 min which is faster than 57.7% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Approximate value from reported charging range: 115 minutes.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
?
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
no
Voice assistant support
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This smartwatch does not support voice assistants. 67.8% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
What reviewers say
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen size
1.75 inch
Screen size
1.75 inch
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.75 inch which is larger than the screens of 83.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 1.8% of smartwatches.
Display type
LCD
Display type
LCD
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This smartwatch uses a LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 90.1% of smartwatches and the same as that of 7.4% of smartwatches.
Resolution
320x 385
Resolution
320x 385
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 320x385 which is lower than that of 54.2% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
286 ppi
Pixel density
286 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 286 ppi which is lower than that of 64.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
What reviewers say
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Noise Colorfit Ultra vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 0.35 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.75 inch
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.8 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.75 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • 2 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9 days
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    9 days vs 7 days
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 5 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    115 min
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (115 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 115 minutes.
    115 min vs 120 min
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • 49.8% more popular
    Noise Colorfit Ultra has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.17 vs 6.1).
    9.17 vs 6.12
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Noise Colorfit Ultra is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • 49.8% more popular
    Noise Colorfit Ultra has a higher popularity than the average smartwatch (9.17 vs 6.1).
    9.17 vs 6.12
  • 2.89x cheaper
    Noise Colorfit Ultra is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£45 vs £130).
    £45 vs £130
  • Weight tracking
    Weight tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This smartwatch supports weight tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 39.1% of smartwatches support weight tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 2 days day/s longer battery life
    Battery life
    9 days
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 9 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    9 days vs 7 days
  • 5 min shorter charge time
    Charge time
    115 min
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 min – >150 min
    This smartwatch charges faster than the average smartwatch (115 min vs 120 min). The average smartwatch charges in 120 min.
    Approximate value from reported charging range: 115 minutes.
    115 min vs 120 min
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.1
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This smartwatch supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (5.1 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • 0.35 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.75 inch
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.8 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.75 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • 9.7% worse value for money
    Noise Colorfit Ultra has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.85 vs 7.5).
    6.85 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This smartwatch does not support automatic activity detection, the average smartwatch does. 79.7% of smartwatches support automatic activity detection.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No achievement tracking
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch does not support achievements, the average smartwatch does. 85.8% of smartwatches support achievements.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • 20 fewer exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    60
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports fewer exercise modes than the average smartwatch (60 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    60 vs 80
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This smartwatch uses LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    LCD vs AMOLED
  • 48.5 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • 40 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    286 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (286 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    286 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • 1.6 mm taller watch height
    Height
    46.6 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is taller than the average smartwatch (46.6 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    46.6 mm vs 45 mm
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice assistant
    Voice assistant support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice assistants, the average smartwatch does. 67.7% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No widget support
    Widget support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartwatch does not support widgets, the average smartwatch does. 83.1% of smartwatches support widgets.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

7.0
Vimal Chintapatla
≈ estimated
27/07/2021
Hands-on review · features, health sensors and price
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Ultra is a good smartwatch with decent features, but for the money it could offer much more.
7.0
Gadget Gig
≈ estimated
18/07/2021
Unboxing and review · features and app walkthrough
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Ultra has a good design and display, but menu lag and better rival options mean it only suits lag-tolerant buyers.
9.0
Tech Unboxing
≈ estimated
15/07/2021
Unboxing and review · display, health tracking and notifications
Verdict
Noise Colorfit Ultra offers very good value for fitness fans, though messages cannot be answered from the watch.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

What reviewers agree on

Based on 6 · 5

The display and premium build win praise, but sluggish responsiveness and unreliable GPS draw the most criticism.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.0
indiatoday.in
✓ explicit
03/08/2021
Hands-on review · Big-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise ColorFit Ultra is a sturdy aluminum watch with a big, legible screen and a week of battery, but its slow touch response lets it down.
7.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
17/08/2021
Hands-on test · Big-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise ColorFit Ultra suits casual users who want a big, bright screen, but its sleep tracking is inaccurate and it has no GPS.
7.0
indianexpress.com
✓ explicit
04/12/2021
Hands-on test · Sports smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise ColorFit Ultra suits everyday tracking with its big colourful screen and good battery life, but it lacks GPS and an ambient light sensor.
6.0
gadgetsnow.indiatimes.com
✓ explicit
15/08/2021
Hands-on review · Big-screen smartwatch
Verdict
The Noise ColorFit Ultra is a lightweight watch with a bright, large screen and a week of battery, but slow touch response and no built-in GPS hold it back.

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Noise Colorfit Ultra

  • Premium aluminium alloy build quality that feels sturdy and looks high-end
  • Large and vibrant 1.75-inch display with good outdoor visibility
  • Solid battery life typically lasting 5 to 7 days on a single charge
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for long-duration wear
  • IP68 water and dust resistance rating
  • Feature-rich companion 'NoiseFit' app with extensive watch face customisation

What we don't like about Noise Colorfit Ultra

  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a connected smartphone for distance tracking
  • Inconsistent sleep tracking accuracy, specifically failing to record awake time during cycles
  • Occasional slow touch response or lag in the user interface
  • Absence of an ambient light sensor, necessitating manual brightness adjustments
  • Notifications cannot be expanded to show full message content
  • Weak magnetic connection on the charging cable

Verdict

The Noise Colorfit Ultra is a budget-friendly smartwatch featuring a large 1.75-inch TruView LCD touch display with a 320x385 pixel resolution and a premium aircraft-grade 6061 aluminium alloy body. It offers comprehensive health tracking through the Noise Health Suite, including 24/7 heart rate monitoring, SpO2 blood oxygen tracking, stress monitoring, and REM sleep analysis, alongside support for 60 sports modes and IP68 water resistance. Key pros include its lightweight 47g design, a long-lasting 300mAh battery providing up to 9 days of use, and a dedicated productivity suite with features like stock market updates and quick message replies. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS, the absence of an ambient light sensor for automatic brightness adjustment, and a user interface that occasionally suffers from slow touch response and lacks smooth animations.

Compare Noise Colorfit Ultra with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Noise Colorfit Ultra and other Smartwatches

No results found