OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:0.96 inchBattery life:5 daysDisplay type:OLED

Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 2 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

4.8

Technical score

30%

7.4

Review score ( 1 · 1)

Review score 30% · 7.4 · based on 1 written review + 1 video
1 written review + 1 video count as 1.5 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 88% of smartwatches
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

24%

4.0

Health

21%

6.1

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

3.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.5

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 89% of smartwatches
7.4

Review score

Review score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Grades by review (2)
≈ estimated
1

20%

9.0

instinctsportif.com

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 65% of smartwatches
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
  • mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium
mykronoz-zecircle2-premium

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

24%

4.0

Health

21%

6.1

Fitness

16%

5.3

Battery

14%

4.2

Smart features

12%

3.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.5

Hardware

4.8
Review score
Review score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Grades by review (2)
≈ estimated
1

20%

9.0

instinctsportif.com

estimated from the review
1 review, its grade estimated from the review text. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.9
Brand name
Mykronoz
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
Readings are for wellness use, not medical diagnosis.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
no
Barometer
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch does not include a barometer. 49.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 63.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 6.5% of smartwatches.
Up to 5 days standby.
Battery life in training mode
61 h
Battery life in training mode
61 h
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 61 h in training mode which is longer than 95.9% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
150 mAh
Battery power
150 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 150 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 95.7% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.6% of smartwatches.
Charge time
?
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
yes
Voice assistant support
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This smartwatch supports voice assistants. 32.4% of smartwatches support voice assistants.
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than the screens of 97.7% of smartwatches and equal to those of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Display type
OLED
Display type
OLED
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This smartwatch uses a OLED display type which is less advanced than that of 50.3% of smartwatches and the same as that of 9.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
198x 240
Resolution
198x 240
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 198x240 which is lower than that of 91.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.2% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
324 ppi
Pixel density
324 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 324 ppi which is lower than that of 55.1% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.4% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
?
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • 41.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    61 h
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (61 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    61 h vs 19.25 h
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 4 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    18.0 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (18 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    18.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    leather
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch uses leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    leather vs silicone
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 7.5 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    34.5 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (34.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    34.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 15 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    60.0 °C
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (60 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    60.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • 41.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    61 h
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (61 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    61 h vs 19.25 h
  • NFC functionality
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This smartwatch supports NFC, the average smartwatch does not. 43.4% of smartwatches support NFC.
  • 4 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    18.0 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (18 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    18.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • Better band material
    Band material
    leather
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This smartwatch uses leather for the band material, while the average smartwatch uses silicone.
    leather vs silicone
  • Better case material
    Case material
    stainless steel
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This smartwatch uses stainless steel for the case material, while the average smartwatch uses polycarbonate.
    stainless steel vs polycarbonate
  • 10.5 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    34.5 mm
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (34.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    34.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • 7.5 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    34.5 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (34.5 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    34.5 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 15 °C higher max temperature
    Maximum operating temperature
    60.0 °C
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <35 °C – >60 °C
    This smartwatch handles a higher maximum operating temperature than the average smartwatch (60 °C vs 45 °C). The average smartwatch reaches 45.0 °C.
    60.0 °C vs 45.0 °C
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • 8.7% worse value for money
    Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (6.92 vs 7.5).
    6.92 vs 7.52
  • No stress monitoring
    Stress monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This smartwatch does not support stress monitoring, the average smartwatch does. 65.4% of smartwatches support stress monitoring.
  • No cycle tracking
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support menstrual cycle tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • No multi-sport mode
    Multi-sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a multi-sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 68.4% of smartwatches include a multi-sport mode.
  • No pace tracking
    Pace tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This smartwatch does not support pace tracking, the average smartwatch does. 78.6% of smartwatches support pace tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • No swim mode
    Swim sport mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a swim sport mode, the average smartwatch does. 74.9% of smartwatches include a swim sport mode.
  • No voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice feedback, the average smartwatch does. 61.9% of smartwatches support voice feedback.
  • No low-power mode
    Low power mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a low power mode, the average smartwatch does. 92.5% of smartwatches include a low power mode.
  • 150 mAh smaller battery capacity
    Battery life
    150 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a smaller battery capacity than the average smartwatch (150 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    Up to 5 days standby.
    150 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Rechargeable battery; chemistry unspecified.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • 2 days day/s shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch offers 5 days of battery life, while the average smartwatch offers 7 days.
    Up to 5 days standby.
    5 days vs 7 days
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This smartwatch supports an older Bluetooth version than the average smartwatch (4 vs 5). The average smartwatch uses 5.0.
    Bluetooth Low Energy support is indicated.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    Based on IP immersion rating (controlled lab conditions, not a swim/diving certification).
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a lower IP rating than the average smartwatch (IP67 vs IP68).
    IP67 vs IP68
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 0.44 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a smaller screen size than the average smartwatch (1 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    OLED
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch uses OLED display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    OLED vs AMOLED
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    198 x 240
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 198x240, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    198x240 vs 352x430
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No call answering
    Call answering
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This smartwatch does not support call answering, the average smartwatch does. 58.1% of smartwatches support call answering.
  • No call controls
    Call control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This smartwatch does not offer call control, the average smartwatch does. 90.9% of smartwatches offer call control.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not support a smart alarm, the average smartwatch does. 52.7% of smartwatches support smart alarms.
  • No gesture control
    Gesture control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This smartwatch does not support gesture control, the average smartwatch does. 77.7% of smartwatches support gesture control.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartwatch is an older model than the average smartwatch (2017 vs 2021). The average smartwatch was released in 2021.
    May 2017
    2017 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
instinctsportif.com
≈ estimated
14/08/2026
Multi-week test · Fitness tracker
Verdict
The MyKronoz Zecircle 2 is an elegant, light tracker for steps, notifications and music control, but its NFC payments only work with supported banks.

Third-party reviews

What we like about Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium

  • Slim and elegant design that fits well on smaller wrists
  • Effective smartphone connectivity for alerts and notifications
  • Bright touchscreen display that remains visible in daylight
  • Support for contactless payments via NFC (in supported markets)
  • Impressive battery life for its size, often lasting up to 5 days
  • Includes useful lifestyle features like camera remote and phone locator

What we don't like about Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium

  • Weak Bluetooth range leading to frequent disconnections
  • Lack of automatic reconnection after the device loses sync
  • The companion app is described as 'spartan' or basic compared to competitors
  • Sleep tracking requires manual activation and can be unreliable if sleep is interrupted
  • Does not include a built-in heart rate monitor
  • Limited after-sales support and difficulty finding replacement chargers

Verdict

The MyKronoz ZeCircle2 Premium is an ultra-slim activity tracker featuring a 0.96-inch TFT colour touchscreen (240x198 px) housed in a polished stainless steel case with a genuine leather band. It is equipped with a 3-axis accelerometer to track steps, distance, calories, and sleep, while also offering contactless payment via NFC (Mastercard-supported) and IP67 water resistance. Main pros include its stylish premium finish, long 5-day battery life from a 70 mAh battery, and convenient smartphone notifications. However, it lacks advanced sensors such as a heart rate monitor or built-in GPS, and it does not support answering calls directly from the wrist.

Compare Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Mykronoz Zecircle2 Premium and other Smartwatches

No results found