OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Smartwatches Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Smartwatches Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 3,488 independent expert reviews and 5,192 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartwatches Methodology v2.0

Fire Boltt Epic Plus Review | 126 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Screen size:1.83 inchBattery life:7 daysDisplay type:IPS LCD

Fire Boltt Epic Plus Review: Compare 126 technical specifications and 3 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartwatches category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartwatch's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartwatches on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

70%

5.4

Technical score

30%

6.9

Review score ( 0 · 3)

Review score 30% · 6.9 · based on 3 videos
3 videos count as 1.5 of the 5 needed; the rest counts as 7/10. Every model in this category gets the same split: reviews 30%, technical score 70%. A video or a short review counts less than a full test.
â–¼Worse than 80% of smartwatches
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

24%

5.9

Health

21%

6.9

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.3

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.1

Hardware

â–¼Worse than 75% of smartwatches
6.9

Review score

Review score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Grades by review (3)
Video reviews 2

10%

9.0

Suraj Parvat

10%

8.0

Blue Boy

estimated from the review
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88% of smartwatches
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
  • fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus
fire-boltt-epic-plus

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartwatch Fire Boltt Epic Plus

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartwatchx27s technical performance, covering seven key areas: health, fitness, display & design, hardware, battery, smart features and connectivity.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartwatches based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

24%

5.9

Health

21%

6.9

Fitness

16%

5.7

Battery

14%

4.3

Smart features

12%

2.5

Connectivity

9%

5.6

Display & Design

4%

5.1

Hardware

5.4
Review score
Review score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: Reviews are 30% of the overall score for every model in this category; each of the 5 needed reviews that is missing counts as 7/10.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Grades by review (3)
Video reviews 2

10%

9.0

Suraj Parvat

10%

8.0

Blue Boy

estimated from the review
3 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Share in the overall score: 30%, the same for every model in this category.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartwatch's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartwatch with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Brand name
Fire
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 11% of models
This smartwatch includes a heart rate monitor. 10.5% of smartwatches include a heart rate monitor.
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
Blood oxygen monitoring
yes
â–² Better than 33% of models
This smartwatch supports blood oxygen monitoring. 33.4% of smartwatches support blood oxygen monitoring.
ECG
no
ECG
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This smartwatch does not support ECG. 16.6% of smartwatches support ECG.
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
Irregular heart rate warnings
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support irregular heart rate warnings. 48.2% of smartwatches support irregular heart rate warnings.
Show more
Accelerometer
yes
Accelerometer
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This smartwatch includes an accelerometer. 0.6% of smartwatches include an accelerometer.
Barometer
yes
Barometer
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This smartwatch includes a barometer. 50.6% of smartwatches include a barometer.
Gyroscope
no
Gyroscope
no
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope. 70% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
Cadence sensor
no
Cadence sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cadence sensor. 31.2% of smartwatches include a cadence sensor.
Distance tracking
yes
Distance tracking
yes
â–² Better than 4% of models
This smartwatch supports distance tracking. 4.1% of smartwatches support distance tracking.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <1 days – >16 days
This smartwatch offers a battery life of 7 days which is longer than that of 38.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 17.1% of smartwatches.
7 (or 5-6 days with heavy use/BT calling.
Battery life in training mode
28 h
Battery life in training mode
28 h
â–² Better than 69% of models
Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
This smartwatch lasts 28 h in training mode which is longer than 69.5% of smartwatches and equal to that of 1.2% of smartwatches.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery power
390 mAh
Battery power
390 mAh
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <195 mAh – >475 mAh
This smartwatch has a battery capacity of 390 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 73.5% of smartwatches and equal to those in 0.4% of smartwatches.
Charge time
120 min
Charge time
120 min
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <60 min – >150 min
This smartwatch charges in 120 min which is faster than 13.1% of smartwatches and equal to the charge time of 44.2% of smartwatches.
Show more
Operating system
Proprietary OS
Operating system
Proprietary OS
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch runs Proprietary OS which is less advanced than the operating system in 53.5% of smartwatches and the same as that in 42.8% of smartwatches.
Software update frequency
ended
Software update frequency
ended
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartwatch has ended software update support which is less active than that of 42.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 57.5% of smartwatches.
Third-party app support
no
Third-party app support
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This smartwatch does not support third-party apps. 47.7% of smartwatches support third-party apps.
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch supports notifications. 0.3% of smartwatches support notifications.
Voice assistant support
?
Show more
Cellular module
no
Cellular module
no
â–¼ Worse than 18% of models
This smartwatch does not include a cellular module. 18% of smartwatches include a cellular module.
SIM cards
0
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
This smartwatch does not support GPS. 56.2% of smartwatches support GPS.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 39% of models
This smartwatch does not support Galileo navigation. 38.5% of smartwatches support Galileo navigation.
Compass
no
Compass
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This smartwatch does not include a compass. 52.7% of smartwatches include a compass.
Show more
Screen size
1.83 inch
Screen size
1.83 inch
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
This smartwatch has a screen size of 1.83 inch which is larger than the screens of 90.2% of smartwatches and equal to those of 0.8% of smartwatches.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch uses a IPS LCD display type which is less advanced than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and the same as that of 6.6% of smartwatches.
Resolution
240x 286
Resolution
240x 286
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x286 which is lower than that of 67.4% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.9% of smartwatches.
Pixel density
204 ppi
Pixel density
204 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
This smartwatch has a pixel density of 204 ppi which is lower than that of 90.7% of smartwatches and equal to that of 0.3% of smartwatches.
Display brightness
?
Show more
CPU speed
?
Processor model
?
RAM
?
Internal storage
0 GB
Internal storage
0 GB
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
This smartwatch uses 0 GB for internal storage which is smaller than that of 73.6% of smartwatches and equal to that of 26.4% of smartwatches.
No local user storage for apps/media
External memory slot
no
External memory slot
no
Category Benchmark
This smartwatch does not include an external memory slot. 0.3% of smartwatches include an external memory slot.
Show more

Fire Boltt Epic Plus vs the average smartwatch

246810TotalHealthFitnessBatteryConnectivityDisplay & DesignSmart featuresHardware
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • 0.43 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.83 inch
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.8 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.83 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 22 g lighter weight
    Weight
    23.0 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (23 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    23.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 8.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    28 h
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (28 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    28 h vs 19.25 h
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • 6.5x cheaper
    Fire Boltt Epic Plus is cheaper than the average smartwatch (£20 vs £130).
    £20 vs £130
  • Blood pressure monitoring
    Blood pressure monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This smartwatch supports blood pressure monitoring, the average smartwatch does not. 22% of smartwatches support blood pressure monitoring.
  • Calorie tracking
    Calorie tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    This smartwatch supports calorie tracking, the average smartwatch does not. 48.6% of smartwatches support calorie tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    This smartwatch tracks water intake, the average smartwatch does not. 44% of smartwatches track water intake.
  • Barometer sensor included
    Barometer
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This smartwatch includes a barometer, the average smartwatch does not. 49.5% of smartwatches include a barometer.
  • 40 more exercise profiles
    Multi-sport mode
    120
    â–² Better than 32% of models
    This smartwatch supports more exercise modes than the average smartwatch (120 vs 80). The average smartwatch supports 80 exercise modes.
    120 vs 80
  • 8.75 h longer training battery life
    Battery life in training mode
    28 h
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5.5 h – >48 h
    This smartwatch lasts longer in training mode than the average smartwatch (28 h vs 19.25 h). The average smartwatch lasts 19.25 h.
    28 h vs 19.25 h
  • 90 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery life
    390 mAh days
    â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
    Market range: <1 days – >16 days
    This smartwatch has a larger battery capacity than the average smartwatch (390 mAh vs 300 mAh). The average smartwatch battery is 300 mAh.
    7 (or 5-6 days with heavy use/BT calling.
    390 mAh vs 300 mAh
  • 0.43 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.83 inch
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <1.2 inch – >1.82 inch
    This smartwatch has a larger screen size than the average smartwatch (1.8 inch vs 1.4 inch). The average smartwatch screen is 1.40 inch.
    1.83 inch vs 1.40 inch
  • 22 g lighter weight
    Weight
    23.0 g
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <29 g – >80 g
    This smartwatch is lighter than the average smartwatch (23 g vs 45 g). The average smartwatch weighs 45.0 g.
    23.0 g vs 45.0 g
  • 1.1 mm thinner watch body
    Thickness
    10.50 mm
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    Market range: <9.8 mm – >14.1 mm
    This smartwatch is thinner than the average smartwatch (10.5 mm vs 11.6 mm). The average smartwatch thickness is 11.6 mm.
    Some sources mention variant-dependent thickness values.
    10.50 mm vs 11.6 mm
  • 2 mm narrower band
    Width of band
    20.0 mm
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <20 mm – >22 mm
    This smartwatch has a narrower band width than the average smartwatch (20 mm vs 22 mm). The average smartwatch band is 22.0 mm wide.
    20.0 mm vs 22.0 mm
  • 7 mm narrower watch width
    Width
    35.0 mm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <34.6 mm – >46.8 mm
    This smartwatch is narrower than the average smartwatch (35 mm vs 42 mm). The average smartwatch width is 42.0 mm.
    35.0 mm vs 42.0 mm
  • 4.5 mm shorter watch height
    Height
    40.5 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <39.5 mm – >51 mm
    This smartwatch is shorter than the average smartwatch (40.5 mm vs 45 mm). The average smartwatch height is 45 mm.
    40.5 mm vs 45 mm
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • 6.12x less popular
    Fire Boltt Epic Plus has a lower popularity than the average smartwatch (1 vs 6.1).
    1 vs 6.12
  • 6.1% worse value for money
    Fire Boltt Epic Plus has a lower value-for-money score than the average smartwatch (7.09 vs 7.5).
    7.09 vs 7.52
  • No smart scale support
    Smart scale compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support smart scale compatibility, the average smartwatch does. 53.7% of smartwatches support smart scale compatibility.
  • No elevation tracking
    Elevation tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartwatch does not support elevation tracking, the average smartwatch does. 64.3% of smartwatches support elevation tracking.
  • No route tracking
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support route tracking, the average smartwatch does. 74.6% of smartwatches support route tracking.
  • No coaching features
    Coaching
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This smartwatch does not support coaching, the average smartwatch does. 54.6% of smartwatches support coaching.
  • No auto-pause
    Auto pause
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This smartwatch does not support auto pause, the average smartwatch does. 59.3% of smartwatches support auto pause.
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a gyroscope, the average smartwatch does. 69.9% of smartwatches include a gyroscope.
  • Basic battery type
    Battery type
    Li-ion
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartwatch uses a Li-ion battery, while the average smartwatch uses Li-Po.
    Li-ion vs Li-Po
  • No GPS support
    Route support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This smartwatch does not support GPS, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches support GPS.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a compass, the average smartwatch does. 52.6% of smartwatches include a compass.
  • 49 m lower water resistance depth
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <1 m – >50 m
    This smartwatch has a shallower waterproof rating than the average smartwatch (1 m vs 50 m). The average smartwatch reaches 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No always-on display
    Always-On Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not have an always-on display, the average smartwatch does. 67.6% of smartwatches have an always-on display.
  • Basic display type
    Display type
    IPS LCD
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch uses IPS LCD display technology, while the average smartwatch features AMOLED.
    IPS LCD vs AMOLED
  • No ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartwatch does not include an ambient light sensor, the average smartwatch does. 60.7% of smartwatches include an ambient light sensor.
  • 122 ppi lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    204 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <207 ppi – >461 ppi
    This smartwatch has a lower pixel density than the average smartwatch (204 ppi vs 326 ppi). The average smartwatch display reaches 326 ppi.
    204 ppi vs 326 ppi
  • Less practical form
    Form
    rectangular
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This smartwatch uses a rectangular form, while the average smartwatch uses round.
    rectangular vs round
  • Lower resolution
    Display type
    240 x 286
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch has a display resolution of 240x286, while the average smartwatch reaches 352x430.
    240x286 vs 352x430
  • No music playback
    Music playback
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This smartwatch does not support music playback, the average smartwatch does. 54.2% of smartwatches support music playback.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartwatch does not support voice commands, the average smartwatch does. 67% of smartwatches support voice commands.
  • No passcode
    Passcode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartwatch does not include passcode protection, the average smartwatch does. 67.8% of smartwatches include passcode protection.
  • No calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    This smartwatch does not support calendar sync, the average smartwatch does. 94.8% of smartwatches support calendar sync.
  • No speaker
    Built-in speaker
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This smartwatch does not include a built-in speaker, the average smartwatch does. 56.1% of smartwatches include a built-in speaker.
  • 4 GB less storage
    Internal storage
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >32 GB
    This smartwatch offers less internal storage than the average smartwatch (0 GB vs 4 GB). The average smartwatch provides 4 GB of storage.
    No local user storage for apps/media
    0 GB vs 4 GB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Suraj Parvat
≈ estimated
20/12/2022
Unboxing and review · strap, waterproofing and feature tests
Verdict
Fire Boltt Epic Plus is a good smartwatch and worth buying if the price drops.
Not graded
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What we like about Fire Boltt Epic Plus

  • Extremely affordable pricing, often cited as a key value proposition.
  • Comprehensive health monitoring features including SpO2, heart rate, and sleep tracking.
  • Impressive battery life, typically lasting between 5 to 7 days on a single charge.
  • Large HD display with 2.5D curved glass that is easy to read indoors.
  • Wide range of sports modes (over 100) catering to various fitness activities.
  • Lightweight and stylish design that mimics premium smartwatches.

What we don't like about Fire Boltt Epic Plus

  • Inaccurate fitness tracking; users report inconsistent step counts and heart rate readings.
  • Poor outdoor visibility due to the reflective nature of the LCD panel.
  • Sub-par build quality of accessories, specifically mentioned are the 'flimsy' charger and 'cheap-looking' straps.
  • Slow touch responsiveness and 'raise to wake' feature, which can hinder the user experience.
  • Limited app ecosystem and lack of synchronization with popular third-party apps like Strava.
  • Reported issues with long-term durability and customer service responsiveness.

Verdict

The Fire-Boltt Epic Plus is an entry-level smartwatch featuring a large 1.83-inch HD IPS LCD display with a 240 x 280 pixel resolution and 2.5D curved glass. Key characteristics include an IP68 water-resistance rating, over 120 sports modes, and a suite of health monitoring tools such as SpO2, 24/7 heart rate tracking, and sleep analysis. Its main pros are the extensive battery life of up to 7 days, a lightweight design (approx. 23g), and high value for money with inclusions like built-in games and smart notifications. However, common cons involve the lack of built-in GPS, limited outdoor screen visibility due to the non-AMOLED panel, and occasional inaccuracies in fitness tracking sensors typical of budget devices.

Compare Fire Boltt Epic Plus with other Smartwatches

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fire Boltt Epic Plus and other Smartwatches

No results found