OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Smartphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Smartphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Smartphones Methodology v1.0

Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) Review | 197 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620RAM capacity:12 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:6.67 inchesMain camera megapixels:13 MP & 2 MP

Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 197 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Smartphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best smartphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

8.1

User score

▼Worse than 73% of smartphones
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

25%

5.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.0

Camera

15%

6.8

Display

15%

6.4

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

6.2

Connectivity

4%

4.7

Audio

3%

5.6

Design

▼Worse than 75% of smartphones
8.1

User score

User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 534 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 70% of smartphones
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
  • poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt
poco-f4-gt

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of smartphone Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare smartphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

25%

5.4

Performance & Hardware

18%

5.0

Camera

15%

6.8

Display

15%

6.4

Battery

10%

7.2

Software

10%

6.2

Connectivity

4%

4.7

Audio

3%

5.6

Design

5.9
User score
User score
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 534 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.1
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 69% of models
Popularity:
Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) has a popularity of 7.5 points, which is higher than 69.4% of smartphones.
7.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

7.2

Price

6.5
Brand name
Poco
Processor model
MediaTek Helio P35
Processor model
MediaTek Helio P35
▼ Worse than 96% of models
This smartphone uses the MediaTek Helio P35 processor model which is slower than processors in 96.4% of smartphones and equal to processors in 0.4% of smartphones.
RAM capacity
12 GB
RAM capacity
12 GB
▲ Better than 59% of models
Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
This smartphone has a RAM capacity of 12 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 59% of smartphones and equal to that of 24.3% of smartphones.
Internal storage
256 GB
Internal storage
256 GB
▲ Better than 39% of models
Market range: <64 GB – >512 GB
This smartphone has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 38.8% of smartphones and equal to that of 38.3% of smartphones.
CPU boost clock speed
2.3 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
2.3 GHz
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
The CPU boost clock speed of this smartphone is 2.3 GHz which is lower than the boost speed of 63.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.4% of smartphones.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 1% of models
This smartphone uses the Android operating system, which outperforms that of 1%.
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
Android version
Android 13
▼ Worse than 51% of models
This smartphone runs Android version Android 13 which is older than that found in 50.6% of smartphones and equal to that in 16.5% of smartphones.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
▼ Worse than 21% of models
This smartphone does not receive direct OS updates. 20.6% of smartphones receive direct updates.
Open-source OS
yes
Open-source OS
yes
▲ Better than 5% of models
This smartphone uses an open-source OS. 94.6% of smartphones use an open-source OS.
Dark mode
yes
Dark mode
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This smartphone offers dark mode. 95.8% of smartphones support this feature.
Show more
Multi-lens main camera
yes
Multi-lens main camera
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This smartphone includes a multi-lens main camera system. 93.7% of smartphones include multi-lens setups.
Main camera megapixels
13 MP & 2 MP
Main camera megapixels
13 MP & 2 MP
▼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <10 – >100
This smartphone has a main camera resolution of 13 MP & 2 MP which is lower than that of 89.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.6% of smartphones.
Main camera aperture
f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This smartphone has a main camera aperture of f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 83% of smartphones and equal to that of 3.3% of smartphones.
Main camera sensor area
8.3 mm²
Main camera sensor area
8.3 mm²
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
This smartphone has a main camera sensor area of 8.3 mm² which is smaller than the main camera sensor area of 99.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.2% of smartphones.
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
Main camera pixel size
0.8 µm
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0.64 µm – >1.22 µm
This smartphone has a main camera pixel size of 0.8 µm which is larger than in 35.5% of smartphones and equal to the size in 21.9% of smartphones.
1.6 binned
Show more
Number of SIM slots
2
Number of SIM slots
2
▲ Better than 4% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This smartphone has 2 SIM slots, which is more than in 3.8% of smartphones and equal to the number in 96.1% of smartphones.
Cellular module
yes
Cellular module
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone includes a cellular module. 100% of smartphones include cellular modules.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 67% of models
This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity. 66.9% of smartphones support 5G.
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports LTE. 99.7% of smartphones include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This smartphone supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 100% of smartphones offer Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Screen size
6.67 inches
Screen size
6.67 inches
▼ Worse than 48% of models
Market range: <6.3 inches – >6.82 inches
This smartphone has a screen size of 6.67 inches which is larger than the screens of 38.3% of smartphones and equal to those of 13.4% of smartphones.
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
Screen resolution
1080x 2400 px
▼ Worse than 43% of models
This smartphone has a screen resolution of 1080x2400 px which is higher than that of 36.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 20.4% of smartphones.
Pixel density
395 ppi
Pixel density
395 ppi
▼ Worse than 49% of models
Market range: <264 ppi – >460 ppi
This smartphone has a pixel density of 395 ppi which is higher than that of 41.7% of smartphones and equal to that of 8.9% of smartphones.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
▲ Better than 41% of models
This smartphone uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 58.6% of smartphones use this display technology.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Refresh rate
120 Hz
▲ Better than 35% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >144 Hz
This smartphone supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 34.7% of smartphones and equal to that in 55.2% of smartphones.
Show more
Battery capacity
10,600 mAh
Battery capacity
10,600 mAh
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
This smartphone has a battery capacity of 10,600 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 95.9% of smartphones and equal to those in 0.8% of smartphones.
Charging speed
120 W
Charging speed
120 W
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This smartphone supports charging speeds of 120 W which is faster than in 94.4% of smartphones and equal to speeds in 4.6% of smartphones.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 93% of models
This smartphone does not support fast charging. 93.1% of smartphones support fast charging.
GSMArena full wired charge time
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 25% of models
This smartphone does not support wireless charging. 25.2% of smartphones support wireless charging.
Show more
Stereo speakers
no
Stereo speakers
no
▼ Worse than 64% of models
This smartphone does not include stereo speakers. 64.4% of smartphones provide stereo audio.
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
3.5 mm headphone jack
yes
▲ Better than 55% of models
This smartphone includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack. 45.5% of smartphones offer this port.
Number of microphones
3
Number of microphones
3
▲ Better than 77% of models
Market range: <1 – >3
This smartphone includes 3 microphones, which is more than in 77.2% of smartphones and equal to the number in 19.7% of smartphones.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
▲ Better than 66% of models
This smartphone includes an FM radio. 34.2% of smartphones offer FM radio functionality.
aptX Lossless
no
aptX Lossless
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This smartphone does not support aptX Lossless. 12.9% of smartphones provide aptX Lossless.
Show more
Height
162.5 mm
Height
162.5 mm
▲ Better than 63% of models
Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
This smartphone has a height of 162.5 mm which is shorter than 63.5% of smartphones and equal to that of 0.9% of smartphones.
Width
76.7 mm
Width
76.7 mm
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
This smartphone has a width of 76.7 mm which is wider than 67.3% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.5% of smartphones.
Thickness
8.5 mm
Thickness
8.5 mm
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
This smartphone has a thickness of 8.5 mm which is thicker than 60.4% of smartphones and equal to that of 4.3% of smartphones.
Weight
210 g
Weight
210 g
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <175 g – >256 g
This smartphone weighs 210 g which is heavier than 72.6% of smartphones and equal to the weight of 0.9% of smartphones.
Device volume
98,496 cm³
Device volume
98,496 cm³
▼ Worse than 57% of models
Market range: <80 cm³ – >190 cm³
This smartphone has a device volume of 98,496 cm³ which is larger than 56.9% of smartphones and equal to that of 1.3% of smartphones.
Show more

Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) vs the average smartphone

246810TotalPerformance & HardwareSoftwareCameraConnectivityDisplayBatteryAudioDesign
  • 2.12x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    10,600 mAh
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (10600 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    120 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • 2.99x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    9,328
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (9,328 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    9,328 vs 3,115
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    12 GB
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2x higher touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    480 Hz
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <120 Hz – >480 Hz
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (480 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    480 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    5000000:1
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (5000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    5,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • 2.59x higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    9,922
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <975 – >12.4k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (9,922 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    9,922 vs 3,825
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    3
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • 1.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Poco F4 GT
    the average smartphone
    Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) has a higher user score than the average smartphone (8.13 vs 8.000).
    8.13 vs 8
  • 37.2% more popular
    Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) is more popular than the average smartphone (7.46 vs 5.4).
    7.46 vs 5.44
  • 2.99x higher 3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life benchmark
    9,328
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <661 – >11.1k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life than the average smartphone (9,328 vs 3,115). The average smartphone scores 3,115.
    9,328 vs 3,115
  • 4 GB more RAM
    RAM capacity
    12 GB
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <4 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone has more RAM capacity than the average smartphone (12 GB vs 8 GB). The average smartphone has 8 GB of RAM.
    12 GB vs 8 GB
  • 2.59x higher 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark
    9,922
    ▲ Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <975 – >12.4k
    This smartphone scores higher in 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited than the average smartphone (9,922 vs 3,825). The average smartphone scores 3,825.
    9,922 vs 3,825
  • 2 more memory channels
    Memory channels
    4
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2 – >4
    This smartphone has more memory channels than the average smartphone (4 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 memory channels.
    4 vs 2
  • 47% higher Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,385
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <392 – >2.2k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 single-core than the average smartphone (1,385 vs 942). The average smartphone scores 942 in single-core.
    1,385 vs 942
  • 2.02x higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    3DMark Wild Life Extreme benchmark
    2,479
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <313 – >4.7k
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme than the average smartphone (2,479 vs 1,226). The average smartphone scores 1,226.
    2,479 vs 1,226
  • 50% more L3 cache
    L3 cache
    6,144 KB
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <1k KB – >8.2k KB
    This smartphone has more L3 cache than the average smartphone (6144 KB vs 4096 KB). The average L3 cache is 4096 KB.
    6,144 KB vs 4,096 KB
  • 19.9% higher Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    3,037
    ▲ Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >6.7k
    This smartphone scores better in Geekbench 6 multi-core than the average smartphone (3,037 vs 2,533). The average smartphone scores 2,533 in multi-core.
    average user submitted score
    3,037 vs 2,533
  • Higher CPU base clock speed
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 2.3 GHz & 4 x 1.8 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This smartphone has a higher CPU base clock speed than the average smartphone (4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz). The average smartphone has a base clock speed of 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz.
    4x2.3 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz vs 2x2.2 GHz & 6x2 GHz
  • 29.4% higher 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark
    787
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <133 – >2.4k
    This smartphone performs better in 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark than the average smartphone (787 vs 608). The average score is 608.
    787 vs 608
  • 1 more flash LEDs
    Number of flash LEDs
    2
    ▲ Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >2
    This smartphone has more flash LEDs than the average smartphone (2 vs 1). The average smartphone has 1 flash LEDs.
    2 vs 1
  • Has a dual-tone LED flash
    Dual-tone LED flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 59% of models
    This smartphone features a dual-tone LED flash, the average smartphone does not. 41.4% of smartphones include dual-tone flash.
  • 2x higher touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    480 Hz
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <120 Hz – >480 Hz
    This smartphone has a higher touch sampling rate than the average smartphone (480 Hz vs 240 Hz). The average touch sampling rate is 240 Hz.
    480 Hz vs 240 Hz
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    5000000:1
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    This smartphone has a higher contrast ratio than the average smartphone (5000000:1 vs 1000000:1). The average smartphone contrast ratio is 1000000:1.
    AMOLED/OLED displays have an effectively infinite contrast ratio
    5,000,000:1 vs 1,000,000:1
  • Better display glass type
    Display glass type
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    This smartphone features a better display glass type than the average smartphone (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5). The average smartphone uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection.
    Corning Gorilla Glass Victus vs Corning Gorilla Glass 5
  • 21.2% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    800 nits
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <437 nits – >1.3k nits
    This smartphone has a higher screen brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 660 nits). The average smartphone brightness is 660 nits.
    800 nits vs 660 nits
  • 2.12x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    10,600 mAh
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >7k mAh
    This smartphone has a larger battery capacity than the average smartphone (10600 mAh vs 5000 mAh). The average smartphone battery is 5000 mAh.
    10,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
  • 3.64x faster charging speed
    Charging speed
    120 W
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This smartphone supports a faster charging speed than the average smartphone (120 W vs 33 W). The average charging speed is 33 W.
    120 W vs 33 W
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    3
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This smartphone has more microphones than the average smartphone (3 vs 2). The average smartphone has 2 microphones.
    3 vs 2
  • Has a 3.5 mm headphone jack
    3.5 mm headphone jack
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This smartphone features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average smartphone does not. 45.5% of smartphones include a standard headphone jack.
  • Has FM radio
    FM radio
    yes
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This smartphone features an FM radio, the average smartphone does not. 34.2% of smartphones include an FM tuner.
  • 1.1 mm shorter
    Height
    162.5 mm
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <156.2 mm – >171.56 mm
    This smartphone is shorter than the average smartphone (162.5 mm vs 163.6 mm). The average smartphone height is 163.6 mm.
    162.5 mm vs 163.6 mm
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio P35
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 74.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    8.3 mm²
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (8.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    8.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    650 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP & 2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • 13.1% worse value for money
    Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average smartphone (6.48 vs 7.3).
    6.48 vs 7.34
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average smartphone (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • Worse processor
    Processor model
    MediaTek Helio P35
    ▼ Worse than 96% of models
    This smartphone uses a worse processor than the average smartphone (MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3).
    MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    12 nm
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >12 nm
    This smartphone is manufactured on a larger process node than the average smartphone (12 nm vs 6 nm). The average smartphone uses a 6 nm process.
    12 nm vs 6 nm
  • 31.6% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    650 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <646 MHz – >1.2k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower GPU frequency than the average smartphone (650 MHz vs 950 MHz). The average smartphone has a GPU frequency of 950 MHz.
    650 MHz vs 950 MHz
  • Lacks multithreading support
    Multithreading
    no
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    This smartphone does not support multithreading, the average smartphone does. 80.5% of smartphones support multithreading.
  • 57.1% lower maximum RAM capacity
    Maximum RAM
    6 GB
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <8 GB – >16 GB
    This smartphone supports less maximum RAM than the average smartphone (6 GB vs 14 GB). The average smartphone supports 14 GB of RAM.
    6 GB vs 14 GB
  • 41.8% slower memory speed
    Memory speed
    1,600 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.8k MHz – >4.8k MHz
    This smartphone has a lower memory speed than the average smartphone (1600 MHz vs 2750 MHz). The average smartphone has a memory speed of 2750 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 2,750 MHz
  • 16.7% higher TDP (less efficient)
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    5 W
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <4 W – >10 W
    This smartphone has a higher TDP than the average smartphone (5 W vs 6 W). The average smartphone has a TDP of 6 W.
    5 W vs 6 W
  • 87.5% fewer shader units
    N. of shading units
    32
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <32 – >1.5k
    This smartphone includes fewer shader units than the average smartphone (32 vs 256). The average smartphone has 256 shader units.
    32 vs 256
  • 41.8% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    14.9 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <13.41 GB/s – >76.6 GB/s
    This smartphone has lower memory bandwidth than the average smartphone (14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s). The average smartphone has a bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s.
    14.9 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s
  • Supports older OpenCL version
    OpenCL version
    1.2
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    This smartphone supports a lower OpenCL version than the average smartphone (1.2 vs 2). The average smartphone supports OpenCL version 2.0.
    1.2 vs 2.0
  • 2.3% less L2 cache
    L2 cache
    1,000 KB
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <512 KB – >4.1k KB
    This smartphone has a smaller L2 cache than the average smartphone (1000 KB vs 1024 KB). The average smartphone has an L2 cache of 1024 KB.
    1,000 KB vs 1,024 KB
  • 4.2% lower CPU boost clock speed
    CPU boost clock speed
    2.3 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <2 GHz – >3.3 GHz
    This smartphone has a lower CPU boost clock speed than the average smartphone (2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The average smartphone has a boost clock speed of 2.4 GHz.
    2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • No live text recognition
    Live text recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone does not support live text recognition, the average smartphone does. 50.9% of smartphones offer real-time text recognition.
  • Lacks app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    no
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This smartphone does not have app tracking protection, the average smartphone does. 70.2% of smartphones include app tracking protection.
  • Older Android version
    Android version
    Android 13
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This smartphone runs an older Android version than the average smartphone (Android 13 vs Android 14). The average smartphone runs Android version Android 14.
    Android 13 vs Android 14
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This smartphone has a narrower main camera aperture than the average smartphone (f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4). The average smartphone aperture is f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4.
    f/1.9 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 vs f/1.8 & f/2.2 & f/2.4 & f/2.4
  • 74.1% smaller main camera sensor area
    Main camera sensor area
    8.3 mm²
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <19.7 mm² – >71.4 mm²
    This smartphone has a smaller main camera sensor area than the average smartphone (8.3 mm² vs 32 mm²). The average smartphone sensor area is 32 mm².
    8.3 mm² vs 32 mm²
  • Worse main camera video quality
    Main camera video
    1080 x 30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This smartphone records worse main camera video than the average smartphone. 11.80x of smartphones support 4K video recording.
    1080x30 fps vs 2160x30 fps
  • Lower-resolution main camera
    Main camera megapixels
    13 MP & 2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 – >100
    This smartphone has a lower-resolution main camera than the average smartphone (13 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP). The average smartphone has a 50 MP & 8 MP main camera.
    13 MP & 2 MP vs 50 MP & 8 MP
  • Lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    5 MP
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <5 – >40
    This smartphone has lower front camera megapixels than the average smartphone (5 MP vs 16 MP). The average smartphone has a 16 MP front camera.
    5 MP vs 16 MP
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    This smartphone does not support timelapse video, the average smartphone does. 92.3% of smartphones include timelapse modes.
  • No 5G connectivity
    5G connectivity
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This smartphone does not support 5G connectivity, the average smartphone does. 66.9% of smartphones are 5G compatible.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This smartphone uses an older Bluetooth version than the average smartphone (5 vs 5.2). The average smartphone uses Bluetooth 5.2.
    5.0 vs 5.2
  • No gyroscope
    Gyroscope
    no
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This smartphone does not have a gyroscope, the average smartphone does. 84.4% of smartphones feature a gyroscope.
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone does not have a compass, the average smartphone does. 93.2% of smartphones include a built-in compass.
  • 200 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    800 nits
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <480 nits – >3.6k nits
    This smartphone has a lower peak brightness than the average smartphone (800 nits vs 1000 nits). The average smartphone peak brightness is 1000 nits.
    800 nits vs 1,000 nits
  • Lower GSMArena battery endurance score
    GSMArena battery life endurance score
    81
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <74 – >125
    This smartphone has a lower GSMArena battery endurance score than the average smartphone (81 vs 99.5). The average smartphone scores 99.5.
    81 vs 99.5
  • No fast charging support
    Fast charging
    no
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    This smartphone does not support fast charging, the average smartphone does. 93.1% of smartphones feature fast charging.
  • No reverse wired charging
    Reverse wired charging
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This smartphone does not support reverse wired charging, the average smartphone does. 60.8% of smartphones support reverse wired charging.
  • 4.5% lower PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark
    751 min
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <487 min – >1.3k min
    This smartphone scores lower in PCMark Work 3.0 battery benchmark than the average smartphone (751 min vs 786 min). The average smartphone scores 786 min.
    751 min vs 786 min
  • No stereo speakers
    Stereo speakers
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This smartphone does not have stereo speakers, the average smartphone does. 64.4% of smartphones feature stereo speakers.
  • No LDAC support
    LDAC
    no
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    This smartphone does not support LDAC, the average smartphone does. 60.3% of smartphones support LDAC.
  • Lower IP rating
    IP rating
    IP53
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This smartphone has a lower IP rating than the average smartphone (IP53 vs IP67). 0.00% of smartphones have a higher IP rating.
    IP53 vs IP67
  • 7% heavier
    Weight
    210 g
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <175 g – >256 g
    This smartphone is heavier than the average smartphone (210 g vs 196.2 g). The average smartphone weighs 196.2 g.
    210 g vs 196.2 g
  • 2 year/s older release date
    Release date
    2022
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This smartphone is an older model than the average smartphone (2022 vs 2024). 2.00% of smartphones were released more recently.
    April 2022
    2022 vs 2024
  • 7.5% lower French repairability index
    French repairability index
    7.4
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <6.2 – >9.5
    This smartphone has a lower French repairability index than the average smartphone (7.4 vs 8). The average smartphone scores 8.
    7.4 vs 8
  • 0.7 mm wider
    Width
    76.7 mm
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <73.1 mm – >81 mm
    This smartphone is wider than the average smartphone (76.7 mm vs 76 mm). The average smartphone has a width of 76 mm.
    76.7 mm vs 76 mm
  • 0.2 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.5 mm
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <7.53 mm – >10.5 mm
    This smartphone is thicker than the average smartphone (8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm). The average smartphone has a thickness of 8.3 mm.
    8.5 mm vs 8.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mmorpg.com
27/04/2022
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT Review: A Gaming Phone with Triggers
L
laptopmag.com
12/06/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT review: Gaming appeal(www.pocket-lint.com) | July 7, 2022 | Poco F4 GT review: Blurring the lines(www.trustedreviews.com) | June 24, 2022 |...
G
gsmarena.com
11/11/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT long-term review: Design, biometrics, speakers
P
petapixel.com
26/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: A Gaming Phone With a Capable Camera
Z
zdnet.com
13/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT review: A powerhouse with rapid charging and gaming triggers
G
gsmarena.com
26/04/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT review - GSMArena.com tests
P
petematheson.com
10/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT: The Flagship of Flagships? - Pete Matheson
A
androidcentral.com
24/12/2022
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT long-term review: This gaming phone is still a terrific value(www.notebookcheck.net) | June 10, 2022 | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT smartphone review:...
S
stuff.tv
27/04/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT review: a subtle take on the gaming smartphone
R
root-nation.com
18/06/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: It's Not Only About Gaming
T
techadvisor.com
27/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Casual Gamer(petapixel.com) | May 26, 2022 | Poco F4 GT Review: A Gaming Phone With a Capable Camera
A
allround-pc.com
25/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Top Features at a Mid-Range Price
(Translated)Show original
G
giga.de
18/09/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: A Gaming Smartphone with a Controller Feel
(Translated)Show original
S
smartzone.de
12/07/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review - Gaming Smartphone with Great Value for Money!
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.root-nation.com
23/07/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: It's Not Just About Gaming
(Translated)Show original
L
lesmobiles.com
10/06/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: A Mid-Range Smartphone Built for Gaming
(Translated)Show original
C
charlestech.fr
26/05/2024
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Poco's very surprising gaming smartphone
(Translated)Show original
P
phonandroid.com
03/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Our full verdict on the gaming smartphone
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
22/08/2022
Summary of the review
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT Review: A fast smartphone, but not furious
(Translated)Show original
N
nextpit.fr
14/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: This gaming smartphone really triggered me
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
21/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: A Design Built for Gaming
(Translated)Show original
E
es.root-nation.com
23/07/2022
Summary of the review
Root Nation: Poco F4 GT Review: It's Not Just About Gaming
(Translated)Show original
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
01/05/2022
Summary of the review
Computer Hoy: POCO F4 GT, review and opinion
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
26/04/2022
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT hands-on: the most powerful, ambitious… and expensive POCO to date
(Translated)Show original
P
profesionalreview.com
04/06/2022
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT Review (Full Analysis)
(Translated)Show original
C
corriere.it
29/04/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Massive Power and Pop-up Buttons for Gaming
(Translated)Show original
A
andreagaleazzi.com
26/04/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review – Andrea Galeazzi
(Translated)Show original
E
evosmart.it
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Finally a Flagship Killer!
(Translated)Show original
T
techzilla.it
16/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: The flagship killer with shoulder triggers
(Translated)Show original
G
gamelegends.it
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT – Review of the flagship gaming phone
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
20/05/2022
Summary of the review
Poco F4 GT Review: Accessible power
(Translated)Show original
M
multiplayer.it
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT Review: The Aggressively Priced Android Gaming Phone
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT Review: Not Just for Gamers
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoandroid.net
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
POCO F4 GT Review: Flagship heart, nerd gems, and lightning-fast charging
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 534 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: August 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB)

  • Extremely fast 120W HyperCharge (full charge in ~20 mins)
  • Innovative physical magnetic pop-up triggers for gaming
  • Excellent 120Hz AMOLED display with great outdoor visibility
  • High-end performance via Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
  • Impressive quad-speaker setup with clear, loud audio
  • Subtle design that doesn't look overly like a gaming phone
  • Excellent value for money compared to flagship competitors

What we don't like about Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB)

  • Prone to thermal throttling and overheating during heavy gaming
  • Average battery life, especially when gaming or using 120Hz
  • Camera performance is mediocre, particularly the ultra-wide and macro lenses
  • No 3.5mm headphone jack (though a dongle is often included)
  • No expandable storage via MicroSD card
  • Lack of wireless charging
  • MIUI software contains bloatware and occasional UI bugs

Verdict

The POCO F4 GT (12GB + 256GB variant) is a performance-focused smartphone designed for gaming enthusiasts, featuring flagship-level internal hardware and unique physical magnetic pop-up triggers for enhanced control. Key specifications include the powerful 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor, a vibrant 6.67-inch 120Hz AMOLED flat display, and ultra-fast 120W HyperCharge for its 4,700mAh battery, which can reach full charge in approximately 17-24 minutes. It also boasts impressive symmetrical quad speakers and a 64MP main camera. The main pros are its excellent price-to-performance ratio, the incredibly fast charging speed with the included charger, the smooth 120Hz display with Gorilla Glass Victus protection, and the practical, satisfying shoulder triggers. Cons typically mentioned are a relatively average battery life during heavy use, performance throttling under sustained high loads due to heat, and a camera system that is considered adequate but not on par with non-gaming flagships in the same price range.

Compare Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) with other smartphones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Poco F4 GT (12GB + 256GB) and other smartphones

No results found