Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Philips HomeRun 3000 review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ310Max suction power:4000 PaRuntime:200 minDustbin capacity:350 mLMax threshold height:17 mm

Philips HomeRun 3000 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Philips HomeRun 3000
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

7.0

User score

â–˛Better than 59% of robot vacuums
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

â–˛Better than 66%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

30%

7.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

6.4

Mopping

12%

7.4

Battery

10%

8.7

Smart Features

7%

6.3

Design

â–˛Better than 66%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–ĽWorse than 87%
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
  • philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
philips-homerun-3000
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Philips HomeRun 3000

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

30%

7.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

6.4

Mopping

12%

7.4

Battery

10%

8.7

Smart Features

7%

6.3

Design

7.5
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Philips HomeRun 3000 has a popularity index of 7.4, higher than that of 58% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 1% of robot vacuums.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

8.9

Price

7.9
Max suction power
4,000 Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa, which is higher than 49.5% of robot vacuums and equal to 9.9% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
4
This robot vacuum has 4 suction power levels, which is more than 49.7% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 43.8% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
5
This robot vacuum offers 5 cleaning modes, which is more than 85.9% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 6.2% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
static pad
This robot vacuum uses static pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 20.4% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 46.3% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
semi-circular
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
yes
This robot vacuum updates its map in real time. 68.5% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
yes
This robot vacuum stores multiple maps. 56.4% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
dual-band
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity. 64.7% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,800 mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 4,800 mAh, which is higher than 65.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 0.2% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.76 V
Runtime
200 min
This robot vacuum runs for 200 min per charge, which is longer than 77.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 4.8% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
96 mm
Width
341 mm
Length
341 mm
Weight
3.8 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.8 kg, making it heavier than 62.5% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 2.7% of robot vacuums.
Show more

Philips HomeRun 3000 vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • Has a removable battery
    This robot vacuum has a removable battery, while the average robot vacuum has a fixed battery.
  • 50 min longer runtime
    This robot vacuum runs longer per charge than the average robot vacuum (200 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    200 min vs 150 min
  • 1 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (5 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    5 vs 4
  • Dustbin full alert
    This robot vacuum alerts you when its dustbin is full, while the average robot vacuum does not. 19.5% of robot vacuums offer a dustbin full indicator.
  • 1,600 mAh greater battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a greater battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (4,800 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    4,800 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • Has a removable battery
    This robot vacuum has a removable battery, while the average robot vacuum has a fixed battery.
  • 50 min longer runtime
    This robot vacuum runs longer per charge than the average robot vacuum (200 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    200 min vs 150 min
  • 1,600 mAh greater battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a greater battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (4,800 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    4,800 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 3.96 kg lighter base station
    This robot vacuum has a lighter base station than the average robot vacuum (0.3 kg vs 4.3 kg). The average robot vacuum's base station weighs 4.3 kg.
    0.34 kg vs 4.3 kg
  • Has a child lock
    This robot vacuum has a child lock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.9% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Adjusts its cleaning height automatically
    This robot vacuum adjusts its cleaning height automatically, while the average robot vacuum uses a fixed cleaning height.
  • 1 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (5 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    5 vs 4
  • Dustbin full alert
    This robot vacuum alerts you when its dustbin is full, while the average robot vacuum does not. 19.5% of robot vacuums offer a dustbin full indicator.
  • 1 more water flow levels
    This robot vacuum offers more water flow levels than the average robot vacuum (4 vs 3). The average number of water flow levels is 3.
    4 vs 3
  • 60 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (300 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    300 mL vs 240 mL
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • 3 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (17 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    17 mm vs 20 mm
  • 4 % lower filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has lower filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (95 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    95 % vs 99 %
  • More basic filter
    This robot vacuum uses a EPA 11 filter, while the average robot vacuum uses HEPA.
    EPA 11 vs HEPA
  • 2 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6.5 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6.5 h vs 4.5 h
  • No Bluetooth
    This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity, while the average robot vacuum does. 64.6% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
  • 50 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (350 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    350 mL vs 400 mL
  • 14.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľâ–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Philips HomeRun 3000
    the average robot vacuum
    Philips HomeRun 3000 has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (6.97 vs 8.000).
    6.97 vs 8
  • 2 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (6.5 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    6.5 h vs 4.5 h
  • 6.4% heavier
    This robot vacuum is heavier than the average robot vacuum (3.8 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.8 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • 1 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (66 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    66 dB vs 65 dB
  • No Bluetooth
    This robot vacuum does not support Bluetooth connectivity, while the average robot vacuum does. 64.6% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 3 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (17 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    17 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • 4 % lower filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has lower filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (95 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    95 % vs 99 %
  • More basic filter
    This robot vacuum uses a EPA 11 filter, while the average robot vacuum uses HEPA.
    EPA 11 vs HEPA
  • 50 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (350 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    350 mL vs 400 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
galaxus.at
11/04/2024
Summary of the review
H
homekits.de
13/09/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.de
11/04/2024
Summary of the review
R
rtl.de
23/12/2023
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.ch
11/04/2024
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.ch
11/04/2024
Summary of the review
M
meilleurs-aspirateurs-robots.fr
01/05/2026
Summary of the review
M
meilleurs-aspirateurs-robots.fr
2026
Summary of the review
Q
qualescegliere.it
29/11/2023
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
27/03/2024
Summary of the review
T
test-aankoop.be
Geen datum beschikbaar
Summary of the review
V
vakervrolijk.nl
01/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
26/02/2024
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
15/02/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Philips HomeRun 3000

  • Strong suction up to 4,000 Pa, effective on carpets and pet hair
  • Accurate laser navigation enables good mapping and efficient cleaning plans
  • Excellent battery life up to 200 minutes
  • Low profile easily fits beneath sofas, beds and other low furniture
  • Intuitive mobile app for easy remote scheduling and control

What customers don't like about Philips HomeRun 3000

  • Mopping is sometimes considered basic or weaker than vacuuming
  • Maintaining the mopping system requires regular manual cleaning of the pad
  • The app may experience Wi-Fi connectivity problems in large spaces
  • Navigation can sometimes react unpredictably to unexpected obstacles

Verdict

The Philips HomeRun 3000 Series Aqua is a versatile 2-in-1 robot vacuum and mop that delivers a strong 4,000 Pa suction power alongside a passive flat mopping system. Guided by 360° LiDAR laser navigation, it maps up to 5 floors and automatically boosts suction when detecting carpets to draw out deep-seated dust. Its substantial 4,800 mAh battery provides up to 200 minutes of continuous runtime to cover up to 185 square metres on a single charge, operating at a relatively low noise level of 66 dB and measuring 9.6 cm in height to fit under low furniture. Notable advantages include its dual-band Wi-Fi connectivity via the HomeRun app, an automatic recharge-and-resume feature, and a 350 ml dust bin coupled with a 300 ml water tank. However, major downsides include its lack of advanced small obstacle detection or artificial intelligence, a passive mop that cannot lift on carpets (requiring manual no-mop zones), and the absence of auto-cleaning, auto-drying, or auto-refilling functions at the base station.

Compare Philips HomeRun 3000 with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Philips HomeRun 3000 and other robot vacuums

No results found