OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£950
Avg. price in US: ~$480
PassMark benchmark result: 18930
N. of physical cores: 8
CPU boost clock speed: 4.8 GHz

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

6.6

Good

6.6

Good

?

6.5
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
7.7
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
8.0
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
7.0
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.7
L3 cache
8.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
3.7
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
4.6
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
3.5
N. of physical cores
20.0%
2.8
CPU threads
15.0%
2.7
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £950

Best rankings

#142 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is a high-efficiency Lunar Lake processor featuring an 8-core, 8-thread architecture with 4 Lion Cove performance cores (up to 4.8 GHz) and 4 Skymont efficient cores (up to 3.7 GHz). Key characteristics include 32GB of integrated LPDDR5x-8533 memory, a 47 TOPS NPU for AI acceleration, and the Arc 140V iGPU with 8 Xe-cores for solid integrated graphics performance. Its main pros are exceptional power efficiency with a 17W base TDP, leading to long battery life in thin-and-light laptops, and strong single-core performance. However, cons include the lack of hyper-threading, a relatively low thread count compared to previous generations, and RAM that is soldered directly to the package, making it non-upgradable.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Overall score

6.6

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.0

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

5.8

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

8.5

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

?

Show more

Memory & PCIe

6.1

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.8

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

?

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.5

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

?

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core Ultra 7 258V better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

62.3% better single-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,031 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,031 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.4,031 vs 2,483
86.6% higher single-core score
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,745 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,745 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.2,745 vs 1,471
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Lunar Lake vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Lunar Lake vs Kaby Lake).Lunar Lake vs Kaby Lake
5.6x larger L2 cache
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (14 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=6 MB
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (14 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.14 MB vs 2.5 MB
5x more L2 per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L2 cache available to each CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing per-core cache resources in deeper architectural analysis.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >=1 MB/core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.2.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
2.91x higher memory speed
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,533 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=4800 MHz
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,533 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.8533 MHz vs 2933 MHz
75% smaller process node
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower process node than the average processor (3 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.
When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <10 nm
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower process node than the average processor (3 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.3 nm vs 12 nm
2.97x higher memory bandwidth
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (136 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
What it is: The maximum theoretical memory bandwidth the processor can support.
When it matters: When memory-heavy workloads matter to you.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >75 GB/s
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (136 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.136 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
Advanced security extensions
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V provides more advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SHA, NX bit, Secure Key, SGX, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TDT, TME, TME-MK vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Processor).
4 year/s newer release date
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a newer release date than the average processor (2024 vs 2020).
Supports HMP
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports HMP, the average processor does not.
62.3% better single-core performance
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (4,031 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
86.6% higher single-core score
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (2,745 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
2x higher multi-core score
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (9,599 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
11.6% higher boost clock
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
79.7% higher PassMark score
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (18,930 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
2 more CPU cores
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has more CPU cores than the average processor (8 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
4 wider front-end design
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher front-end width than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Lunar Lake vs Kaby Lake).
5.6x larger L2 cache
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (14 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
5x more L2 per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (2.5 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
75% smaller process node
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower process node than the average processor (3 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
Uses big.LITTLE design
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a big.LITTLE design, the average processor does not.
More advanced foundry
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 3 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
50% larger L3 cache
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (12 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
2.91x higher memory speed
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8,533 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
2.97x higher memory bandwidth
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (136 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
Newer DDR support
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (LPDDR5X vs DDR4).
Higher JEDEC memory speed
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5X-8533 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
Better integrated GPU
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Intel Arc Graphics 140V vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
71.4% higher GPU clock speed
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (600 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
62.2% lower base power
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower base power draw than the average processor (17 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
42.2% lower boost power
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (37 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
62.2% lower TDP
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower TDP than the average processor (17 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Core Ultra 7 258V worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, AES, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
No multithreading support
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
1 fewer threads per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
6 lower clock multiplier
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (22 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
12.5% less L3 per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
8 fewer PCIe lanes
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
50% less memory capacity
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
No multithreading support
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
What it is: Lets each physical core run more than one thread at the same time, such as with Hyper-Threading or SMT.
When it matters: When multitasking, rendering, compiling, virtualization, or other thread-heavy work benefits from more total processing threads.
Importance: HIGH
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V does not support multithreading, the average processor does.
8 fewer PCIe lanes
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
What it is: The number of PCIe lanes provided directly by the processor.
When it matters: When you connect fast GPUs, SSDs, or expansion cards.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=20
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer PCIe lanes than the average processor (8 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.8 vs 16
Narrower instruction support
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, AES, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
What it is: The supported CPU instruction sets and extensions.
When it matters: When you run software that depends on specific CPU instructions.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, AES, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, AES, AMX vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA
3.8x more expensive
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is more expensive than the average processor (£950 vs £250).
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is more expensive than the average processor (£950 vs £250).£950 vs £250
12.5% less L3 per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=2 MB/core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has less L3 cache per core than the average processor (1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.1.5 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
50% less memory capacity
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.
When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >=128 GB
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer maximum memory capacity than the average processor (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.32 GB vs 64 GB
1 fewer threads per core
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.
What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.
When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: 2
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has fewer threads per core than the average processor (1 vs 2). The average processor offers 2 threads per core.1 vs 2
6 lower clock multiplier
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (22 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
What it is: The ratio used to derive CPU frequency from the base clock.
When it matters: When you tune or compare overclocking behavior.
Importance: LOW
Good value: >33
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (22 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.22 vs 28

Cache & Architecture

Graphic comparison of Intel Core Ultra 7 258V and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core Ultra 7 258V?

Exceptional power efficiency, often cited as Intel's most efficient x86 chip to date
Titanic battery life in thin-and-light laptops, reaching up to 16 hours in local video playback tests
Phenomenal integrated graphics (Arc 140V) that can handle modern games at 1080p with respectable frame rates
Strong single-core performance, making it highly responsive for everyday productivity and coding
Runs remarkably cool and quiet, with fans rarely ramping up under average workloads
Broad software and game compatibility inherent to the x86 architecture compared to ARM alternatives

What customers dislike about Intel Core Ultra 7 258V?

Mediocre multi-threaded performance due to the lack of Hyper-Threading and a low core count (8 cores/8 threads)
Soldered, on-package RAM (32GB) means the memory is not upgradable after purchase
Performance can drop significantly when running on battery compared to some competitors
GPU driver stability issues have been noted, including occasional crashes or fluctuating frame rates in some games
AI-driven features (NPU) can sometimes be inconsistent, such as misidentifying shadows or activating unrequested functions
Early Linux support may be limited or require specific kernel versions (6.12+) for full compatibility

Expert reviews

tomshardware.com

13/09/2024

Summary of the review

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V beats AMD Z1 Extreme in DX12 benchmark

A Tom's Hardware review indicates the AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme outperforms the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V in DX12 gaming when memory is normalized, with up to 92.7% higher frame rates. While the Z1 Extreme's RDNA 3 graphics provide superior raw gaming performance (pros), the Intel chip offers vastly better efficiency and lower power consumption (pros). Ultimately, the Z1 Extreme delivers higher performance, but the Core Ultra 7 258V boasts superior efficiency and newer platform technology (cons).

pcworld.com

24/09/2024

Summary of the review

Tested: Intel's Lunar Lake wants you to forget Qualcomm ever existed

Intel’s Lunar Lake (Core Ultra Series 2) architecture, tested in the Asus Zenbook S 14, offers competitive, "Snapdragon-like" battery life (nearly 24 hours in video tests) while maintaining full x86 software compatibility. The platform's integrated Xe2 GPU provides a significant 30-50% graphics boost over previous generations, alongside a 48 TOPS NPU for AI tasks. While efficient, the processor exhibits weaker multi-core performance under heavy, sustained workloads compared to competitors. Furthermore, a notable drawback is the substantial performance degradation observed when running on battery power, rather than plugged in.

arstechnica.com

25/09/2024

Summary of the review

Review: Intel Lunar Lake CPUs combine good battery life and...

Ars Technica's review of Intel's Core Ultra 200V "Lunar Lake" series highlights a strategic shift toward power efficiency, boasting battery life that rivals Qualcomm Snapdragon and Apple M-series chips while offering strong single-core performance. Key improvements include superior Xe2 integrated graphics, making these chips highly capable for thin-and-light laptops, though the removal of Hyperthreading and a lower core count results in decreased multi-threaded performance compared to predecessors. Another major drawback is the switch to on-package, soldered memory, which eliminates user upgradability to achieve these performance-per-watt gains. The processor is positioned as an excellent choice for mainstream portability rather than heavy workstations, delivering strong Windows compatibility.

guru3d.com

10/12/2024

Summary of the review

Review: Core Ultra 7 258V - ASUS Zenbook S 14 (Lunar lake)

The ASUS Zenbook S 14 (UX5406), powered by the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V "Lunar Lake" processor, is a highly efficient, 1.2kg premium ultrabook featuring a "Ceraluminum" chassis and a 14-inch 3K 120Hz OLED display. Key strengths include exceptional battery life (14-16 hours) and competitive integrated graphics (Arc 140V) for casual gaming, though the soldered, non-upgradable memory and weak webcam are noted downsides. While ideal for mobile professionals due to low noise and solid single-core performance, the 8-core CPU lacks Hyper-Threading, resulting in weaker multi-core performance for heavy rendering workloads.

laptopmedia.com

01/03/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V - Benchmarks and performance tests

The Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ("Lunar Lake") focuses on extreme energy efficiency for thin-and-light laptops, featuring an 8-core/8-thread design (4 P-cores, 4 E-cores) and 47 TOPS AI performance, notes LaptopMedia. A major advantage is the Intel Arc Graphics 140V, which offers a significant graphical boost enabling 1080p gaming, alongside industry-leading battery efficiency. However, the chip lacks hyper-threading, resulting in lower multi-threaded performance compared to competitors, and its on-package soldered RAM prohibits future upgrades.

larazon.es

13/04/2025

Summary of the review

ASUS ExpertBook P5 Review: Premium Design, Powerful Performance, Long Battery Life, and AI Features with Copilot

The ASUS ExpertBook P5 (P5405) is a durable 1.29 kg aluminum business laptop featuring a 14-inch 2.5K 144Hz display, as reviewed by La Razón. Powered by Intel Core Ultra 7 "Lunar Lake," it excels in productivity, offering 13–14+ hours of battery life and AI-driven tools like ASUS ExpertMeet. While praising its performance and screen, the review notes minor drawbacks, including slightly "mushy" touchpad clicks, 100% sRGB color limitation, and grainy low-light webcam performance. For the full analysis, visit La Razón.

pronetic.geeknetic.es

29/10/2024

Summary of the review

ASUS ExpertBook P5 P5405CSA Review with Core Ultra 7 258V

The ASUS ExpertBook P5 P5405CSA, featuring the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (Lunar Lake), is a 14-inch business laptop with a durable aluminum chassis and a notable 144Hz 2560x1600 matte display, according to Geeknetic. Key advantages include exceptional battery life (over 10 hours), robust performance with 32GB RAM, integrated Intel Arc 140V graphics, and advanced AI features via the ASUS ExpertMeet suite. However, the review notes drawbacks, including soldered, non-upgradeable RAM and lower multi-core performance compared to some competitors. Pros for this device include the efficient processor, smooth display, and modern connectivity (Wi-Fi 7, Thunderbolt 4), while potential cons involve limited availability for specific high-spec configurations.

laptopmedia.com

29/09/2024

Summary of the review

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: Intel's chip is the dark horse winner

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V is deemed the "hidden winner" over the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite, offering superior single-core responsiveness and better x86 software compatibility for daily tasks. While the Snapdragon X Elite excels in raw multi-core performance (pro) and battery life (pro), it suffers from compatibility issues (con). Conversely, the Intel chip's main drawback is lower multi-core performance compared to the Qualcomm chip. The review highlights a significant graphical advantage for Intel, with the Arc Graphics 140V described as an unmatched iGPU that outpowers the Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU and even some dedicated cards. This makes the Intel chip superior for gaming, whereas the Snapdragon's GPU faces optimization issues with many titles. Ultimately, the Intel 258V is recommended for its "everything just works" reliability and exceptional integrated graphics. The Snapdragon X Elite remains a strong choice, specifically for users prioritizing extreme, long-lasting battery life and heavy multi-threaded productivity. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

29/09/2024

Summary of the review

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V vs. Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite: Intel's chip is the hidden winner here

LaptopMedia labels the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V the "hidden winner" over the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite due to superior real-world versatility and single-core responsiveness. While the Snapdragon offers roughly 45% higher multi-core performance, Intel’s chip, featuring the Arc Graphics 140V, provides superior gaming and creative performance that rivals a 40W RTX 3050. Intel holds the advantage in AI with 47–48 TOPS and ensures 100% app compatibility, whereas the ARM-based Snapdragon faces, software emulation challenges. For the full comparison and detailed, see the article at LaptopMedia.

tweakers.net

24/09/2024

Summary of the review

Lightweight Powerhouse with Lunar Lake - ASUS Zenbook S 14

The Tweakers.net review of the Asus Zenbook S 14 (UX5406) highlights it as a premium, 1.2 kg ultraportable featuring Intel’s Lunar Lake architecture and a durable, stain-resistant "Ceraluminium" finish. The device boasts an impressive 3K 120Hz OLED display and exceptional battery life exceeding 15–17 hours, rivaling Apple's M-series efficiency. While the Core Ultra 7 258V offers great single-core responsiveness and capable Arc 140V integrated graphics, the laptop's thin design results in shallow, 1.1 mm keyboard travel, limited hinge angle, and soldered, non-upgradable RAM.

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare Intel Core Ultra 7 258V with other processors

Compare