OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Processors Methodology v3.0
Processors Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Processors Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Processors Methodology v3.0

Intel Core i7-7820EQ review: 74 specs compared

Avg. price:~£320PassMark multi-core score:7061N. of physical cores:4CPU boost clock speed:3.7 GHzCPU socket:FCBGA1440TDP (Thermal design power):45 W

Intel Core i7-7820EQ Review: Compare 74 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1/10

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

40%

4.3

Technical score

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 72% of processors
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

6.1

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

60%

3.4

Performance

18%

4.9

Architecture

10%

4.8

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.3

Power & Thermal

4%

7.5

Platform

1%

6.8

Integrated graphics

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £320
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
    Loading category ranking...

    Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7-7820EQ

    Technical score
    Technical score
    4.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
    Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
    Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Score components:

    60%

    3.4

    Performance

    18%

    4.9

    Architecture

    10%

    4.8

    Memory & PCIe

    7%

    7.3

    Power & Thermal

    4%

    7.5

    Platform

    1%

    6.8

    Integrated graphics

    4.3
    Reviews score
    7.2
    List score
    ?
    Value for money
    Value for money
    6.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
    When it matters
    When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Score components:

    70%

    6.1

    Overall score

    30%

    8.8

    Price

    6.9
    Processor type
    embedded
    This processor belongs to the embedded processor class, which is less advanced than that of 93.1% of processors and equal to that of 6.9% of processors.
    CPU socket
    FCBGA1440
    This processor uses the FCBGA1440 CPU socket, which is older than that of 82.6% of processors and equal to that of 4.5% of processors.
    Chipset
    ?
    CPU architecture
    x86-64
    This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.8% of processors and equal to that of 98.2% of processors.
    Instruction sets
    MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES
    This processor supports MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES instruction sets, which is narrower support than 54.4% of processors and equal to that of 3.4% of processors.
    Show more
    N. of physical cores
    4
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This processor has 4 CPU cores, which is fewer than 52.8% of processors and equal to 27.5% of processors.
    CPU threads
    8
    Market range: <4 – >24
    This processor offers 8 CPU threads, which is more than 33.4% of processors and equal to 18.8% of processors.
    CPU boost clock speed
    3.7 GHz
    Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
    This processor reaches a boost clock of 3.7 GHz which is lower than that of 74.2% of processors and equal to that of 3.6% of processors.
    CPU base clock speed
    4x 3 GHz
    This processor has a base clock of 4x3 GHz which is lower than that of 61.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.4% of processors.
    PassMark multi-core score
    7,061
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor scores 7,061 in PassMark, which is lower than 63% of processors.
    Show more
    Semiconductor size
    ?
    Foundry
    Intel 14 nm
    This processor is built on the Intel 14 nm foundry process, which is less advanced than that of 55.9% of processors and equal to that of 29% of processors.
    L3 cache
    8 MB
    Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
    This processor has an L3 cache of 8 MB which is smaller than that of 50.7% of processors and equal to that of 11.5% of processors.
    L2 cache
    1 MB
    Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
    This processor has an L2 cache of 1 MB which is smaller than that of 68.3% of processors and equal to that of 17% of processors.
    L1 cache
    256 KB
    Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
    This processor has an L1 cache of 256 KB which is smaller than that of 60.4% of processors and equal to that of 18.1% of processors.
    Show more
    DDR memory version
    DDR4
    This processor supports DDR DDR4, which is newer than that of 25.2% of processors and equal to that of 31.1% of processors.
    Maximum memory speed
    2,400 MHz
    Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
    This processor supports memory speeds up to 2,400 MHz, which is lower than that of 64.6% of processors and equal to 11.7% of processors.
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    DDR4-2400 MHz
    This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to DDR4-2400 MHz, which is lower than that of 67.7% of processors and equal to 10.9% of processors.
    Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
    N/A
    Maximum memory capacity
    64 GB
    Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
    This processor supports up to 64 GB of memory, which is more than 27.2% of processors and equal to 26.1% of processors.
    Show more
    Integrated graphics
    yes
    This processor includes integrated graphics. 14.7% of processors offer this.
    Integrated GPU model
    Intel HD Graphics 630
    This processor uses the Intel HD Graphics 630 integrated GPU, which is less advanced than that in 71.9% of processors and equal to that in 2.7% of processors.
    Integrated GPU execution units
    24
    Market range: <6 – >64
    This processor has 24 GPU execution units, which is more than 49.1% of processors and equal to 20.8% of processors.
    Integrated GPU base frequency
    350 MHz
    Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
    This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 350 MHz which is higher than that of 42.7% of processors and equal to that of 25.4% of processors.
    Integrated media encoders/decoders
    ?
    Show more
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    45 W
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a TDP of 45 W which is lower than that of 41.9% of processors and equal to that of 10.8% of processors.
    Base power (PL1)
    45 W
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a base power of 45 W which is lower than that of 41.9% of processors and equal to that of 11% of processors.
    Boost power (PL2)
    56 W
    Market range: <25 W – >150 W
    This processor has a boost power of 56 W which is lower than that of 59.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.3% of processors.
    Tau (power duration limit)
    28 seconds
    Market range: <8 seconds – >28 seconds
    This processor has a turbo duration of 28 seconds which is longer than that of 4.4% of processors and equal to that of 85.3% of processors.
    Configurable TDP
    yes
    This processor supports configurable TDP. 46.4% of processors offer this.
    cTDP: 35 W
    Show more

    Intel Core i7-7820EQ vs the average processor

    246810TotalPlatformPerformanceArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated graphicsPower & Thermal
    • 2.93x faster Blender rendering
      This processor has a lower Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (1,166.9 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
      1,166.86 vs 398.015
    • 28.8% smaller die size
      This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (126 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
      126 mm² vs 177 mm²
    • 8.1% more L3 per core
      This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
      2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
    • 2.93x faster Blender rendering
      This processor has a lower Blender BMW27 render time than the average processor (1,166.9 vs 398). The average processor needs 398.015 for the Blender BMW27 test.
      1,166.86 vs 398.015
    • 28.8% smaller die size
      This processor has a lower die size than the average processor (126 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
      126 mm² vs 177 mm²
    • 8.1% more L3 per core
      This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.85 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
      2 MB/core vs 1.85 MB/core
    • 85.7% lower multi-core score
      This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (746 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
      746 vs 5,209
    • 51.4% lower single-core score
      This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (746 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
      746 vs 1,535
    • 15.9% lower boost clock
      This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
      3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
    • 22.9% weaker single-core performance
      This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1972 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
      1,972 vs 2,558
    • 2 fewer CPU cores
      This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
      4 vs 6
    • 38.4% lower PassMark score
      This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (7,061 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
      7,061 vs 11,469
    • Weaker security extensions
      This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
      AES-NI, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
    • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
      This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
      1 MB vs 3 MB
    • 5.4% worse value for money
      Intel Core i7-7820EQ has worse value for money than the average processor (6.91 vs 7.3).
      6.91 vs 7.29
    • 28% more expensive
      Intel Core i7-7820EQ is more expensive than the average processor (£320 vs £250).
      £320 vs £250
    • Weaker security extensions
      This processor provides less advanced security extensions than the average processor (AES-NI, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK).
      AES-NI, SGX, TXT, MPX, OS Guard, Boot Guard vs AES-NI, NX bit, Secure Key, TXT, OS Guard, Boot Guard, CET, MBEC, TME, TME-MK
    • Narrower instruction support
      This processor supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V).
      MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA, AMD-V
    • Older CPU socket
      This processor uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1440 vs FP5).
      FCBGA1440 vs FP5
    • 3 years older release date
      This processor has an older release date than the average processor (2017 vs 2020).
      January 2017
      2017 vs 2020
    • More limited crypto acceleration
      This processor offers more limited crypto acceleration than the average processor (AES vs AES, SHA).
      AES vs AES, SHA
    • 85.7% lower multi-core score
      This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (746 vs 5,209). The average processor scores 5,209 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
      746 vs 5,209
    • 51.4% lower single-core score
      This processor has a lower Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (746 vs 1,535). The average processor scores 1,535 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
      746 vs 1,535
    • 15.9% lower boost clock
      This processor has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.4 GHz.
      3.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
    • 22.9% weaker single-core performance
      This processor has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (1972 vs 2,558). The average processor scores 2,558 in PassMark single-core.
      1,972 vs 2,558
    • 2 fewer CPU cores
      This processor has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
      4 vs 6
    • 38.4% lower PassMark score
      This processor has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (7,061 vs 11,469). The average processor scores 11,469 in PassMark benchmark.
      7,061 vs 11,469
    • 16.2% weaker multi-core performance
      This processor has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (2,351 vs 2,804.5). The average processor scores 2,804.5 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
      2,351 vs 2,804.5
    • 6.7% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
      This processor has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (457 vs 490). The average processor scores 490 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
      457 vs 490
    • Lower base clock
      This processor has a lower base clock than the average processor (4x3 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz).
      4x3 GHz vs 4x3.4 GHz
    • 66.7% smaller L2 cache
      This processor has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (1 MB vs 3 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 3 MB.
      1 MB vs 3 MB
    • 50% less L2 per core
      This processor has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
      0.25 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
    • 33.3% smaller L1 cache
      This processor has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (256 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
      256 KB vs 384 KB
    • 27.3% lower memory bandwidth
      This processor has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (34.1 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s.
      34.1 GB/s vs 46.9 GB/s
    • 25% lower memory speed
      This processor has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2,400 MHz vs 3,200 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 3,200 MHz.
      2,400 MHz vs 3,200 MHz
    • Lower JEDEC memory speed
      This processor has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (DDR4-2400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
      DDR4-2,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
    • Limited PCIe bifurcation
      This processor supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4).
      x16, x8/x8, x8/x4/x4 vs x16, x8/x8, x4/x4/x4/x4
    • Inferior integrated GPU
      This processor uses an inferior integrated GPU to the average processor (Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
      Intel HD Graphics 630 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

    Third-party reviews

    What customers like about Intel Core i7-7820EQ

    • Efficient energy consumption designated by the 'E' in its model name
    • Reliable performance for everyday tasks and multitasking with 4 cores and 8 threads
    • Capable of handling video editing and professional workloads
    • Quick system boot and shutdown speeds when paired with an SSD
    • Supports Intel Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz for increased performance under load
    • Compatible with modern operating systems like Windows 11

    What customers don't like about Intel Core i7-7820EQ

    • Dated architecture that is no longer competitive with current-generation processors
    • Limited core count (4 cores) compared to modern high-end alternatives
    • Inadequate for recent AAA gaming titles or high-resolution gaming
    • Higher initial cost compared to i3 or i5 counterparts of the same era
    • Occasional screen lag or frame drops in graphics-intensive applications

    Verdict

    The Intel Core i7-7820EQ is a 7th Generation Kaby Lake-H embedded processor featuring 4 cores, 8 threads, and an 8 MB Smart Cache. It operates at a 3.00 GHz base frequency with a maximum turbo boost of 3.70 GHz and integrates Intel HD Graphics 630. Main pros include a moderate 45W TDP suitable for industrial and commercial systems, support for up to 64 GB of DDR4-2400 memory, and hardware-accelerated 4K video decoding. However, main cons include its older 14nm lithography which is no longer competitive with modern architectures, lack of ECC memory support, and its status as an 'End of Servicing' product as of early 2024.

    Compare Intel Core i7-7820EQ with other processors

    1Product to compare no. 1
    VS
    2Product to compare no. 2
    VS
    3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

    Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7-7820EQ and other processors

    No results found