OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Core i7 1065g7 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£360
Avg. price in US: ~$430
PassMark benchmark result: 8114
N. of physical cores: 4
CPU boost clock speed: 3.9 GHz

Intel Core i7 1065g7 review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

4.4

Poor

4.4

Poor

?

3.6
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
3.6
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
4.6
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.3
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
2.1
L3 cache
8.0%
1.8
N. of physical cores
1.9
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
1.6
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
1.8
N. of physical cores
20.0%
2.8
CPU threads
15.0%
2.1
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £360

Best rankings

#430 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a 10th Gen 'Ice Lake' quad-core processor built on a 10nm process, featuring 8 threads, a 1.3GHz base clock, and a 3.9GHz max turbo boost. Key highlights include 8MB of Intel Smart Cache and high-performance Iris Plus G7 integrated graphics with 64 execution units, making it ideal for thin-and-light laptops requiring AI acceleration and Wi-Fi 6 support. While it offers excellent power efficiency and strong integrated GPU performance for its class, it is held back by relatively low base clock speeds and a tendency for thermal throttling in compact chassis under sustained heavy workloads.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i7 1065g7

Overall score

4.4

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

8.0

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

3.2

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

5.6

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

5.3

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

8.4

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

?

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.3

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Core i7 1065g7 vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i7 1065g7 better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

66.7% lower base power
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
30.9% smaller die size
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower die size than the average processor (123 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
What it is: The physical area of the processor die, usually measured in square millimeters.
When it matters: When you are comparing chip scale, packaging density, or broader design differences rather than direct user-visible performance.
Importance: LOW
Good value: <150 mm²
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower die size than the average processor (123 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².123 mm² vs 178 mm²
Includes crypto acceleration
Intel Core i7 1065g7 includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
What it is: Built-in hardware support for accelerating encryption and cryptographic tasks.
When it matters: When encryption speed or secure workloads matter to you.
Importance: LOW
Intel Core i7 1065g7 includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.AES, VAES, SHA, PCLMULQDQ vs AES, SHA
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
Newer DDR support
Intel Core i7 1065g7 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4 vs DDR4).
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: DDR5
Intel Core i7 1065g7 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4 vs DDR4).DDR4/LPDDR4 vs DDR4
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Ice Lake vs Kaby Lake).
What it is: The internal core-design codename used for this processor generation.
When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs at a deeper design level and want to identify the exact architecture behind marketing names.
Importance: LOW
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Ice Lake vs Kaby Lake).Ice Lake vs Kaby Lake
20.3% lower boost power
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (51 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <50 W
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (51 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.51 W vs 64 W
More advanced foundry
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.
When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.
Importance: MEDIUM
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm vs Intel 14 nm).Intel 10 nm vs Intel 14 nm
Includes crypto acceleration
Intel Core i7 1065g7 includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
8.7% higher single-core score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,599 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
1 wider front-end design
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a higher front-end width than the average processor (5 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
30.9% smaller die size
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower die size than the average processor (123 mm² vs 178 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 178 mm².
More advanced microarchitecture
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Ice Lake vs Kaby Lake).
More advanced foundry
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (Intel 10 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
16.7% smaller process node
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower process node than the average processor (10 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
Newer DDR support
Intel Core i7 1065g7 supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR4 vs DDR4).
27.3% higher memory bandwidth
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (58.3 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
27.3% higher memory speed
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (3,733 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
2.67x more GPU execution units
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has more GPU execution units than the average processor (64 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
66.7% lower base power
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
20.3% lower boost power
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (51 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Core i7 1065g7 worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Narrower instruction support
Intel Core i7 1065g7 supports a narrower instruction set than the average processor (MMX, SSE, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA vs MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, F16C, FMA3, AES, SHA).
Older CPU socket
Intel Core i7 1065g7 uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,526 vs FP2).
41.1% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,639 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
60.3% lower multi-core score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1901 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
2 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
9.3% lower boost clock
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
9.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (438 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
50% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
8.3% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,278 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
50% lower bus speed
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
15 lower clock multiplier
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (13 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
23% lower PassMark score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (8,114 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
20% smaller L2 cache
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (2 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
60.3% lower multi-core score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1901 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1901 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.1,901 vs 4,793
2 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (4 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.4 vs 6
41.1% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,639 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (1,639 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.1,639 vs 2,783
9.3% lower boost clock
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
9.5% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (438 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >600
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (438 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.438 vs 484
50% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
What it is: The maximum data transfer rate supported by the processor's platform bus, usually shown in GT/s.
When it matters: When you are comparing older platform bandwidth limits rather than just raw CPU core performance.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=8 GT/s
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
50% lower bus speed
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
What it is: The base platform clock used by older processor designs to derive other operating speeds.
When it matters: When you are comparing older CPU platforms where bus design still affects how clocks and compatibility are set up.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=8 GT/s
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s
8.3% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,278 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Core i7 1065g7 has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2,278 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.2,278 vs 2,483

Cache & Architecture

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i7 1065g7 and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core i7 1065g7?

Significantly improved integrated graphics (Iris Plus G7) compared to previous 14nm generations
Excellent single-threaded performance for day-to-day productivity tasks like web browsing and office work
Highly power-efficient 10nm architecture with a low 15W TDP, contributing to longer laptop battery life
Supports fast memory (LPDDR4-3733), which boosts overall system responsiveness and benchmark scores
Integrated support for modern standards like Thunderbolt 3 and Wi-Fi 6
Capable of handling light creative workloads, including basic photo and video editing

What customers dislike about Intel Core i7 1065g7?

Multi-threaded performance is underwhelming compared to higher core-count rivals like the 6-core i7-10710U
Still struggles with modern AAA games; graphically intensive titles often remain unplayable even at low settings
Performance is heavily dependent on the laptop's thermal design and power limit settings (15W vs 25W modes)
Integrated graphics drivers can be buggier for gaming compared to AMD's competitive offerings
Often found in higher-priced 'premium' laptops, making it less of a value choice than some AMD Ryzen alternatives

Expert reviews

cpu.userbenchmark.com

01/10/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 - CPU UserBenchmarks

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a 10th-generation "Ice Lake" mobile processor with 4 cores and 8 threads, delivering an average benchmark score of 53.2%. Key pros include the integrated Iris Plus G7 graphics with 64 execution units and a ~18% IPC increase from the Sunny Cove architecture. However, to maintain a 15W envelope, base speeds are low at 1.3 GHz, resulting in, as noted in the TechSpot review, weak multi-threaded performance compared to 6-core 14nm counterparts. The chip excels in ultraportables prioritizing graphics over raw multi-core speed.

laptopmedia.com

26/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-9750H - two different worlds

The LaptopMedia review highlights that the Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10nm, 15W) and i7-9750H (14nm, 45W) cater to distinct needs, with the former prioritizing efficiency in thin-and-light devices and the latter maximizing raw performance. The i7-1065G7 excels with a superior Iris Plus G7 iGPU and faster DDR4-3200 memory, though it is limited by its 4-core, 8-thread design in heavy, sustained workloads. The i7-9750H dominates in heavy tasks like rendering and video editing due to its 6-core/12-thread architecture, but it requires superior cooling, leading to heavier laptops with shorter battery life and relies on a weak UHD 630 iGPU. The i7-1065G7 is recommended for portable, everyday use and light gaming, while the i7-9750H is better suited for power users and content creators needing maximum performance.

laptopmedia.com

08/05/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-10710U – the Comet Lake wins, big time

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core i7-10710U (Comet Lake) outperforms the i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake) by 45% in 3D rendering due to its 6-core/12-thread design, making it the superior choice for raw, heavy-duty processing. While the i7-10710U excels in productivity, its main drawback is weak integrated UHD graphics compared to the Ice Lake alternative. Conversely, the i7-1065G7 provides better Iris Plus G7 graphics and higher memory frequencies, but falls behind significantly in CPU-intensive tasks, making it less suitable for workstation duties. The review concludes that the i7-10710U is the better investment for most users because its massive CPU advantage far outweighs the graphical superiority of the i7-1065G7, especially as users needing high-end graphics should choose dedicated graphics solutions. The 6-core ULV processor offers superior, higher-value performance for demanding applications. Copy

laptopmedia.com

10/12/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs Core i5-1035G1

LaptopMedia analysis of the 10nm Ice Lake processors finds that while the Core i7-1065G7 offers slightly higher clock speeds and a larger cache, it struggles to justify a 44% price premium over the Core i5-1035G1. The i7 excels in demanding tasks with 24% faster CPU performance and superior Iris Plus G7 graphics, but the i5 delivers excellent value for everyday usage, including web browsing and media. Ultimately, the i5-1035G1 is considered the smarter choice for most users due to its superior price-to-performance ratio, making the i7 better suited only for those needing better integrated graphics. Copy

laptopmag.com

01/08/2019

Summary of the review

Intel 10th Gen Ice Lake CPU Benchmarked

The 10th Gen Intel "Ice Lake" Core i7-1065G7 represents a solid, evolutionary step, delivering a 20% to 30% performance leap over 8th Gen "Whiskey Lake" processors. A key pro includes the new Iris Plus integrated graphics, which nearly doubled gaming performance in tests (100.1 fps in Dirt 3) and enabled faster 4K video transcoding. The platform also introduces native support for technologies like Wi-Fi 6, Thunderbolt 3, and specialized AVX-512 instructions. Conversely, the chips struggle with graphically demanding AAA titles (e.g., GTA V at 19 fps) and are outpaced in raw multithreaded tasks by the 14nm Comet Lake series, which offers higher core counts and clock speeds.

techspot.com

05/12/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 Gaming Test: Integrated Graphics Performance

The TechSpot review of the Intel Core i7-1065G7 highlights a 10nm design featuring a 15–18% increase in single-threaded performance and IPC. However, multi-threaded performance remains largely stagnant, representing a major drawback. The 64-unit Iris Plus G7 integrated GPU brings a significant leap for gaming in ultraportables, allowing titles like Fortnite to run well at 45–55 FPS in 25W configurations. While providing massive gains for creative tasks, the graphics capability is heavily limited in demanding titles like Apex Legends and relies heavily on the 25W configuration to outperform 15W modes. The review concludes that while it is a significant improvement for integrated graphics, it still struggles to consistently match entry-level dedicated GPUs.

techspot.com

24/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 Benchmarked: Ice Lake with Iris Plus Graphics

The TechSpot review of the Intel Core i7-1065G7 highlights the 10nm "Ice Lake" chip as a major advancement for ultraportable laptops, specifically showcasing significant "Gen11" Iris Plus graphics improvements. Pros include a roughly 50% performance leap in integrated graphics, making games like Fortnite playable, with even higher gains at 25W TDP. However, cons include lower clock speeds resulting in identical multi-threaded performance to older 14nm chips, and the limitation of being a quad-core processor that is outperformed in productivity by the 6-core 14nm Comet Lake chips. While graphics are improved, they still fall short of dedicated GPUs like the Nvidia MX250, and the chip face stiff competition from AMD's Ryzen Mobile, serving best in thin-and-light devices lacking discrete graphics.

legitreviews.com

01/08/2019

Summary of the review

Intel 10nm Ice Lake Benchmarks on the Core i7-1065G7 Processor

The Legit Reviews analysis of the Intel Core i7-1065G7 highlights a transition to a 10nm process and Sunny Cove architecture, which delivers significant instructions per clock (IPC) improvements despite lower 3.9 GHz maximum clock speeds. The 25W processor demonstrates high efficiency, with performance challenging older desktop chips in various benchmarks. While the Gen11 Iris Plus graphics provide over a 50% performance gain in synthetic tests, enabling casual gaming, the processor faces competition in multi-threaded tasks and gaming from discrete options. Key pros include the massive iGPU leap, high IPC, and AI acceleration (DL Boost), while cons involve reduced clock speeds and, occasionally, less consistent performance compared to some 14nm counterparts.

indiatoday.in

12/08/2020

Summary of the review

Intel 10th Gen Core i7-1065G7 review: Taking the fight to AMD's Ryzen CPUs

The Intel Core i7-1065G7, based on the 10nm Ice Lake architecture, focuses on AI capabilities and integrated Iris Plus G7 graphics, offering substantial performance leaps in light gaming and photo editing. While providing superior single-threaded performance and efficiency for thin laptops, the chip's low 1.3GHz base clock leads to limitations in sustained multi-threaded tasks compared to 14nm counterparts. The processor serves as a specialized "one-chip solution" with strong graphics, native Thunderbolt 3, and Wi-Fi 6, though it often faces stiff competition from higher-clocked alternatives and AMD Ryzen processors in multi-core tasks.

laptopmedia.com

21/03/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-10710U – Comet Lake wins by a landslide

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a 10nm quad-core processor designed for thin-and-light laptops, offering high power efficiency and strong integrated Iris Plus G7 graphics for light, creative, and 3D tasks. While supporting fast memory speeds, it often carries a higher price tag than higher-core 14nm Comet Lake alternatives, offering lower raw multi-core performance for intensive tasks like video rendering. Overall, it serves as a competent, battery-efficient choice for ultrabooks, though it is frequently outperformed in pure computational tasks by AMD Ryzen 4000-series processors. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

notebooks-und-mobiles.de

11/04/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 Review: Testing Ice Lake

The Intel Core i7-1065G7, a 10th-generation 10nm "Ice Lake" processor designed for thin laptops, offers improved efficiency with 4 cores and 8 threads, focusing on a 15-watt TDP. Key pros include significantly enhanced integrated Iris Plus G7 graphics for light gaming and superior single-core performance due to better instructions per clock (IPC), alongside faster LPDDR4x-3733 memory support. However, cons highlighted include limited multi-threaded performance compared to 6-core 14nm alternatives and restricted sustained performance under heavy loads.

hardwareinside.de

03/08/2019

Summary of the review

Intel 10nm Ice Lake Benchmarks: 10th Gen Core i7 Performance Examined

The HardwareInside review of the Intel Core i7-1065G7 highlights the 10nm "Ice Lake" architecture's Sunny Cove cores, which deliver a significant 18% increase in Instructions Per Clock (IPC). A key pro is improved single-threaded efficiency, though a notable con is the lower maximum turbo frequency of 3.9 GHz compared to previous 14nm designs. The Gen 11 Iris Plus graphics provide a massive performance boost, effectively doubling integrated GPU capabilities for 1080p gaming. While these graphics compete well, a limiting factor is that they still lack the power for high-end AAA gaming. Furthermore, the platform shines with native Thunderbolt 3 and Wi-Fi 6 support, alongside AI-acceleration features. However, a major con is the limited multi-threaded performance, with the quad-core chip sometimes underperforming compared to higher-core-count Comet Lake alternatives. Copy

laptopspirit.fr

28/10/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 review: how the Ice Lake processor and its Iris Plus G7 hold up against the Core i7-8565U + GeForce MX250 combo

The LaptopSpirit review compares the 10nm Intel Core i7-1065G7 (Ice Lake) to the older i7-8565U paired with a GeForce MX250, finding that despite lower clock speeds, the i7-1065G7 provides competitive CPU performance and significantly improved integrated graphics. Pros include superior graphics performance from the Iris Plus G7, which is roughly twice as fast as previous generations, alongside support for faster RAM and better efficiency in AI tasks. Cons involve underperformance in sustained, heavy multi-threaded tasks compared to the high-clocked i7-8565U, and the G7 graphics still falling slightly behind a dedicated 25W MX250 in gaming, coupled with a higher initial cost. Copy

laptopmedia.com

18/12/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-10510U – Gaming and CPU Performance

The Intel Core i7-10510U and i7-1065G7 battle features a tradeoff between the 10510U’s 14nm higher clock speeds and the 1065G7’s 10nm newer architecture. The i7-10510U offers a 15% advantage in raw CPU performance for multitasking, though it suffers from poor UHD integrated graphics. Conversely, the i7-1065G7 provides superior Iris Plus G7 graphics for casual gaming and faster memory support, but at a slightly higher cost. Copy

laptopmedia.com

08/05/2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i7-1065G7 vs. i7-10710U – Comet Lake wins big

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core i7-10710U (Comet Lake) is superior in raw performance, boasting 6 cores/12 threads, a 12MB cache, and higher boost clocks to outperform the i7-1065G7 by roughly 45% in multi-threaded tasks. However, the 14nm i7-10710U lags behind the 10nm i7-1065G7 in efficiency and integrated graphics performance. The Ice Lake i7-1065G7 provides superior Iris Plus G7 graphics (44% faster) and better memory support (up to LPDDR4-3733), making it better for thin-and-light laptops relying on integrated GPUs. Ultimately, the i7-10710U is the pro choice for heavy computing, while the i7-1065G7 offers a more balanced, efficient, and graphics-capable alternative.

notebookcheck.biz

07/03/2020

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Review (i7-1065G7, Iris Plus G4): Core i7 and Improved Graphics Performance

The Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (i7-1065G7) retains its predecessor's design while upgrading to Intel's 10th Gen chips, featuring a highly accurate 12.3-inch display and a much-needed USB-C port, though the design is starting to feel dated with thick bezels. The Intel Core i7-1065G7 provides solid productivity performance and significant graphical boosts, yet the device can run hot, and battery life actually decreases compared to the previous model. A major drawback is the lack of Thunderbolt 3 support on the USB-C port and the added expense of purchasing the Type Cover and Pen separately.

laptopspirit.fr

02/08/2019

Summary of the review

Ice Lake – A Review of the Intel Quad-Core i7-1065G7 Processor (10th Gen)

The Intel Core i7-1065G7, part of the 10th-gen "Ice Lake" family, brings 10nm manufacturing and the Sunny Cove architecture to ultra-thin laptops with a 15W TDP. It features a 1.3 GHz base clock, delivering strong single-threaded performance and improved IPC for daily tasks. The processor introduces modern connectivity like Wi-Fi 6, Thunderbolt 3, and supports faster LPDDR4X-3733 memory. A major advantage highlighted is the integrated Iris Plus G7 graphics with 64 execution units, allowing for playable performance in lighter, 1080p gaming scenarios without a dedicated GPU. However, as a quad-core/8-thread chip, it is outclassed in heavy, multi-threaded workloads, such as video editing, by 6-core "Comet Lake" alternatives. The review positions the i7-1065G7 as an efficient, highly portable solution suitable for light media work rather than intensive workstation tasks.

notebookcheck.it

26/02/2020

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Review: i7 Upgrade with Extra GPU Performance

The Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (i7) review by Notebookcheck highlights a 2-in-1 device focusing on internal upgrades, specifically 10th Gen Intel "Ice Lake" processors with significantly improved Iris Plus graphics for better light gaming and creative performance. While adopting a long-awaited USB-C port and maintaining a high-quality 12.3-inch PixelSense display, the device suffers from heavy CPU throttling under sustained loads due to thermal limitations in the thin chassis. The design, now considered dated, lacks Thunderbolt 3 and retains thick bezels, and while a strong upgrade from much older models, its "decent" battery life and performance constraints make it a less compelling upgrade from the Surface Pro 6.

ct.nl

09/11/2020

Summary of the review

Lightweight laptop - Asus ZenBook 13 (2020) review

The 2020 Asus ZenBook 13 (UX325) is a highly portable, 1.07 kg ultrabook with a 13.9 mm thick, military-grade chassis featuring a 67Wh battery that provides excellent 12- to 14-hour endurance. Key pros include the versatile port selection (including HDMI 2.0 and Thunderbolt) and the innovative "NumberPad 2.0" integrated into the touchpad. Performance-wise, the laptop, equipped with 10th or 11th Gen Intel Core processors and Iris Xe graphics, excels at daily tasks, while the 13.3-inch display boasts high brightness and excellent color coverage. The ErgoLift hinge improves typing ergonomics and thermal management, and the device operates quietly under light workloads. However, the design sacrifices, which are considered cons, include the removal of the 3.5mm headphone jack, soldered RAM, and a cramped keyboard layout. Additionally, the display lid is prone to fingerprints, and the 720p webcam provides subpar image quality.

itdaily.be

19/12/2019

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 review: time for a new look

The Microsoft Surface Pro 7 review highlights a high-quality 2-in-1 device that focuses on incremental upgrades, most notably adding a USB-C port while retaining its familiar magnesium alloy design and versatile kickstand. Performance is significantly boosted by 10th-generation Intel Core processors, making it a capable machine, though the design is criticized for having thick, outdated bezels compared to modern competitors. While the 12.3-inch PixelSense display remains excellent, and fast charging is a welcome feature, real-world battery life often fails to last a full workday, and essential accessories like the Type Cover are sold separately. Pros include the high-resolution 3:2 screen, improved graphical performance, and quick Windows Hello authentication, while cons center on the lack of Thunderbolt 3 support, disappointing battery life on the i7 model, and the high total cost of ownership.

laptopmedia.com

29/03/2021

Summary of the review

All our articles tagged Intel Core i7-1065G7

The Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a 10th Gen "Ice Lake" processor designed for thin and light laptops, utilizing a 10nm process with 4 cores, 8 threads, and a boost frequency up to 3.90 GHz. A key feature is the integrated Iris Plus Graphics G7, which offers superior graphical power (64 EUs) compared to previous Intel solutions, ideal for casual gaming and daily productivity. However, it may struggle with high temperatures in poorly cooled, budget-focused laptops, leading to reduced performance. While the i7-1065G7 boasts high Instructions Per Clock (IPC) efficiency and supports fast RAM for improved responsiveness, its 4-core architecture limits it in heavy multi-core tasks compared to 6-core alternatives. The integrated graphics can be a "game-changer" for entry-level tasks, yet its advantage is negated when paired with a dedicated GPU, making it a better fit for laptops lacking dedicated graphics. Ultimately, the processor strikes a balance between portability, efficiency, and integrated graphical power, positioning it as an ideal choice for ultraportable machines meant for combined office work and light gaming. For more details, visit LaptopMedia UK.

notebookcheck.nl

19/04/2020

Summary of the review

Dell XPS 13 (2020) Full Test & Review

The Dell XPS 13 9300 with Intel Core i7-1065G7 is a premium ultrabook featuring a durable CNC aluminium/carbon fiber chassis and a 16:10 InfinityEdge display that maximizes screen space, although the design limits connectivity to only two Thunderbolt 3 ports and a microSD reader. Performance, driven by the "Ice Lake" chip and Iris Plus Graphics, is strong for multitasking and light creative tasks, and it boasts a comfortable, updated keyboard and touchpad. However, the compact, thin design results in thermal challenges under heavy loads, causing potential throttling and noticeable fan noise. Battery life is a major strength, lasting over 12 hours on FHD+ models, though the 4K panel significantly reduces this to around 6–7 hours, and the machine comes at a high price point. Overall, it is regarded as a top-tier, stylish ultraportable with minor compromises in port selection and thermals.

notebookcheck.nl

19/12/2019

Summary of the review

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 (15-inch) review

The Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15-inch with Intel Core i7-1065G7 is lauded as a premium, highly portable business device featuring an exceptional 3:2 PixelSense touchscreen and a robust aluminum chassis. It provides improved performance over its predecessor with 10th Gen Intel Ice Lake graphics and better battery life than the AMD variants, lasting approximately 10 hours. However, key drawbacks include the absence of Thunderbolt 3 support, limited ports, and high temperatures under sustained heavy loads, alongside a high price point.

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare Intel Core i7 1065g7 with other processors

Compare