OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

KLIM Voice V2 Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:?Supported sample rates:48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-a

KLIM Voice V2 Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

5.8

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

75%

5.8

Technical score

25%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 95% of microphones
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

20%

7.7

Audio Performance

20%

3.2

Recording

16%

2.8

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

7.2

Compatibility

5%

4.8

Connectivity

3%

7.0

Design

3%

7.1

Accessories

â–¼Worse than 84% of microphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone KLIM Voice V2

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

20%

7.7

Audio Performance

20%

3.2

Recording

16%

2.8

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

7.2

Compatibility

5%

4.8

Connectivity

3%

7.0

Design

3%

7.1

Accessories

5.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
KLIM Voice V2 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 68.3% of microphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

5.8

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Microphone type
desktop
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
?
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-58 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-a
Headphone output
no
Headphone output
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a headphone output. 62.8% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
no
3.5 mm audio jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack. 63.3% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
yes
6.35 mm audio jack connector
yes
★ Better than 98% of models
This microphone includes a 6.35 mm jack. 1.5% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
N/A
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
no
Cardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
This microphone does not support a cardioid pickup pattern. 91.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
â–² Better than 74% of models
This microphone supports an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 25.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
no
Onboard gain control
no
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This microphone does not include onboard gain control. 51.3% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
â–² Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
210 mm
Height
210 mm
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 210 mm tall, which is taller than 69.7% of microphones and equal in height to 1% of microphones.
Width
103 mm
Width
103 mm
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 103 mm wide, which is wider than 87.2% of microphones and equal in width to 1% of microphones.
Thickness
103 mm
Thickness
103 mm
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 103 mm thick, which is thicker than 84.2% of microphones and equal in thickness to 1.6% of microphones.
Weight
200 g
Weight
200 g
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
This microphone weighs 200 g, which is lighter than 91.2% of microphones and equal in weight to 2.4% of microphones.
Microphone only.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Included accessories
stand; pop filter; cable
Shock mount included
no
Shock mount included
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This microphone does not include a shock mount. 49.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
yes
Windscreen included
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This microphone includes a windscreen. 31.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
1.4 m
Cable length
1.4 m
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 1.4 m which is shorter than that of 90% of microphones.
Android compatibility
no
Android compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Android. 66.3% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
no
iOS compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This microphone is not compatible with iOS. 61.8% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

KLIM Voice V2 vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes 6.35 mm jack
    6.35 mm audio jack connector
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This microphone includes a 6.35 mm jack, the average microphone does not.
  • 5 Hz lower low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    15 Hz
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone extends to lower frequencies than the average microphone (15 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    One source cites 50 Hz.
    15 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 63.8% lighter
    Weight
    200 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (200 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    Microphone only.
    200 g vs 553 g
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    KLIM Voice V2 is cheaper than the average microphone (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 3.5x cheaper
    KLIM Voice V2 is cheaper than the average microphone (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 5 Hz lower low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    15 Hz
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone extends to lower frequencies than the average microphone (15 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    One source cites 50 Hz.
    15 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • Includes 6.35 mm jack
    6.35 mm audio jack connector
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This microphone includes a 6.35 mm jack, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • 63.8% lighter
    Weight
    200 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (200 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    Microphone only.
    200 g vs 553 g
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 4,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    16,000 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (16000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    16,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with Android, the average microphone is.
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • 6.22x less popular
    KLIM Voice V2 has a lower popularity than the average microphone (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.22
  • 12.2% worse value for money
    KLIM Voice V2 has a lower value-for-money score than the average microphone (7.08 vs 7.9).
    7.08 vs 7.94
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    KLIM Voice V2
    the average microphone
    KLIM Voice V2 has a lower user score than the average microphone (8.00 vs 8.027).
    8 vs 8.03
  • 4,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    16,000 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (16000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    16,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 47 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    103 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 25 mm taller body
    Height
    210 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (210 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    210 mm vs 185 mm
  • 1 older release date
    Release date
    2019
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2019 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    April 2019.
    2019 vs 2020
  • 47 mm wider body
    Width
    103 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
    This microphone is wider than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a width of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 0.6 m shorter cable length
    Cable length
    1.4 m
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a shorter cable than the average microphone (1.4 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    1.4 m vs 2 m
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with Android, the average microphone is.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
obli.net
25/08/2017
Summary of the review
KLIM / ANCEL / GHB Voice Desktop USB Microphone Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about KLIM Voice V2

  • Excellent value for money in its price range
  • Simple plug-and-play setup without requiring extra software
  • Decent and clear sound quality for online calls and casual gaming
  • Stable base and durable build materials
  • Convenient physical mute button and volume control
  • Comes with a 5-year warranty for peace of mind

What we don't like about KLIM Voice V2

  • Omnidirectional pickup pattern may capture unwanted keyboard or background noise
  • Not suitable for professional music recording or high-quality podcasting
  • Mute button reliability issues reported by some long-term users
  • Short neck length can be awkward for some desk setups
  • Volume control wheel and mute button are small and can feel fiddly
  • Sound quality may noticeably fade if speaking from more than 2 feet away

Verdict

The KLIM Voice V2 is a plug-and-play USB desktop microphone featuring a gooseneck design and a 1.45m cable, primarily intended for gaming, streaming, and conferencing on PC, Mac, and PS4. Technically, it utilizes an omnidirectional polar pattern with a frequency response range of 15 Hz to 21 kHz, a signal-to-noise ratio of 76 dB, and an impedance of 2.2 KΩ. Key pros include its high durability, built-in mute slider, integrated volume and light control knob, and the inclusion of an anti-pop filter on a stable base. However, its main cons include the lack of a cardioid pattern, which can lead to unwanted background noise pickup like keyboard clicking, and the absence of a shock mount to mitigate physical desk vibrations.

Compare KLIM Voice V2 with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of KLIM Voice V2 and other products in the Microphones category

No results found