OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

KLIM Voice Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:?Supported sample rates:48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-a

KLIM Voice Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

75%

5.8

Technical score

25%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 74% of microphones
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

20%

6.9

Audio Performance

20%

3.2

Recording

16%

2.8

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

8.7

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

6.5

Design

3%

6.3

Accessories

▼Worse than 83% of microphones
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 13,683 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 66% of microphones
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
  • klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice
klim-voice

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone KLIM Voice

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

20%

6.9

Audio Performance

20%

3.2

Recording

16%

2.8

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

8.7

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

6.5

Design

3%

6.3

Accessories

5.8
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.8

Number of reviews

Based on 13,683 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 87% of models
Popularity:
KLIM Voice has a popularity score of 9.8 points, which is higher than 87.4% of microphones.
9.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Microphone type
desktop
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
?
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-58 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-a
Headphone output
no
Headphone output
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a headphone output. 62.8% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
no
3.5 mm audio jack
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack. 63.3% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
▼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
N/A
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
▼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
no
Cardioid pattern
no
▼ Worse than 91% of models
This microphone does not support a cardioid pickup pattern. 91.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This microphone supports an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 25.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
▲ Better than 32% of models
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
▲ Better than 49% of models
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
▲ Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
▼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
▲ Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
▲ Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
210 mm
Height
210 mm
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 210 mm tall, which is taller than 69.7% of microphones and equal in height to 1% of microphones.
Width
103 mm
Width
103 mm
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 103 mm wide, which is wider than 87.2% of microphones and equal in width to 1% of microphones.
Thickness
120 mm
Thickness
120 mm
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 120 mm thick, which is thicker than 92.6% of microphones and equal in thickness to 0.5% of microphones.
Weight
200 g
Weight
200 g
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
This microphone weighs 200 g, which is lighter than 91.2% of microphones and equal in weight to 2.4% of microphones.
With included stand.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Included accessories
stand; pop filter; cable
Shock mount included
no
Shock mount included
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This microphone does not include a shock mount. 49.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
▲ Better than 40% of models
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
▼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
?
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
▲ Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
no
iOS compatibility
no
▼ Worse than 62% of models
This microphone is not compatible with iOS. 61.8% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
yes
Xbox compatibility
yes
★ Better than 99% of models
This microphone is compatible with Xbox. 1% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

KLIM Voice vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • 63.8% lighter
    Weight
    200 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (200 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    200 g vs 553 g
  • 3.5x cheaper
    KLIM Voice is cheaper than the average microphone (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 57.2% more popular
    KLIM Voice has a higher popularity than the average microphone (9.78 vs 6.2).
    9.78 vs 6.22
  • 3.5x cheaper
    KLIM Voice is cheaper than the average microphone (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • 57.2% more popular
    KLIM Voice has a higher popularity than the average microphone (9.78 vs 6.2).
    9.78 vs 6.22
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • 63.8% lighter
    Weight
    200 g
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is lighter than the average microphone (200 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    200 g vs 553 g
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 80 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    100 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (100 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    100 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 10,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    10,000 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (10000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    10,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • 5% worse value for money
    KLIM Voice has a lower value-for-money score than the average microphone (7.56 vs 7.9).
    7.56 vs 7.94
  • 80 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    100 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (100 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    100 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 10,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    10,000 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (10000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    10,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • No zero-latency monitoring
    Zero-latency monitoring
    no
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    This microphone does not support zero-latency monitoring, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No cardioid pickup
    Cardioid pattern
    no
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    This microphone does not support cardioid pickup, the average microphone does.
  • 64 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    120 mm
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (120 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    120 mm vs 56 mm
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2016
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2016 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2016 vs 2020
  • 25 mm taller body
    Height
    210 mm
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (210 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    210 mm vs 185 mm
  • 47 mm wider body
    Width
    103 mm
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
    This microphone is wider than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a width of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
podcastage.com
08/07/2016
Summary of the review
Klim Desktop USB Gaming Microphone Review / Test
O
obli.net
25/08/2017
Summary of the review
KLIM / ANCEL / GHB Voice Desktop USB Microphone Review", "Testing the KLIM / ANCEL / GHB Voice Desktop USB Microphone
(Translated)Show original
T
todasgamers.com
08/10/2018
Summary of the review
Klim VoiceGo Microphone Review: View product dialogue for this item. - Todas Gamers
(Translated)Show original
S
socialandtech.net
14/02/2017
Summary of the review
KLIM Voice Desktop Microphone
(Translated)Show original
T
tuttoapp-android.com
18/03/2017
Summary of the review
Klim Voice USB Desktop Microphone - Our Complete Review", "Klim Voice USB Desktop Mic - Full Review
(Translated)Show original
W
www1.xtremehardware.com
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
Klim Voice - Materials and hands-on impressions
(Translated)Show original
T
tech-hardware.it
04/09/2017
Summary of the review
Review - Klim Voice Microphone: The Essentials at the Right Price
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
01/01/2022
Summary of the review
Thorough and independent microphone reviews - Tweakers
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 13,683 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about KLIM Voice

  • Excellent value for money and affordable pricing for beginners.
  • Simple plug-and-play setup with no drivers or software required.
  • Decent sound quality for casual gaming, Skype calls, and voice dictation.
  • Features a physical mute button and a volume control knob on the base.
  • Highly stable and robust build with a flexible gooseneck for easy adjustment.
  • Compatible with a wide range of systems including Windows, MacOS, Linux, and PS4.
  • Eye-catching design with integrated LED/RGB lighting.

What we don't like about KLIM Voice

  • Omnidirectional polar pattern can pick up unwanted background noise like keyboard typing.
  • Reports of inconsistent durability, specifically with the mute button failing over time.
  • Some users report excessive crackle, hiss, or static at higher gain settings.
  • Limited frequency response (100 Hz to 10 kHz) makes it unsuitable for professional music recording.
  • The base is lightweight and can sometimes slide if the cable is moved.
  • Some reports of 'roomy' or hollow sound quality depending on desk placement.

Verdict

The KLIM Voice is a highly sensitive USB desktop microphone designed for gaming and professional use, featuring an omnidirectional polar pattern and a patented audio filter that suppresses background noise with a 76 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Its technical profile includes a frequency range of 15 Hz to 21,000 Hz, an impedance of 2.2 Kiloohms, and a 1.4m USB cable for easy plug-and-play connectivity across Windows, macOS, and PS4. Main pros include its durable reinforced plastic and metal construction, integrated mute button, volume control dial, and the inclusion of an anti-pop filter and backlit LED base for a stylish aesthetic. However, notable cons include its high sensitivity to ambient desk vibrations or keyboard clicks due to the omnidirectional pickup, and some user reports regarding long-term reliability of the mute switch and potential interference if placed near speakers.

Compare KLIM Voice with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of KLIM Voice and other products in the Microphones category

No results found