Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

HyperX QuadCast S Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140Connection type:USBTransducer type:electret condenserMax SPL:122 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1, 48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-c

HyperX QuadCast S Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

75%

7.6

Technical score

25%

9.3

User score

★Better than 92% of microphones
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.9

Audio Performance

20%

5.2

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

5.4

Connectivity

3%

6.0

Design

3%

8.5

Accessories

▲Better than 84% of microphones
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 6,891 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 90% of microphones
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
  • hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s
hyperx-quadcast-s

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone HyperX QuadCast S

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.9

Audio Performance

20%

5.2

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

5.4

Connectivity

3%

6.0

Design

3%

8.5

Accessories

7.6
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

9.1

Number of reviews

Based on 6,891 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HyperX QuadCast S has a popularity score of 9.1 points, which is higher than 82.9% of microphones.
9.1
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.0

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

8.5
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
electret condenser
Diaphragm size
14 mm
Capsule type
triple
Sensitivity
-36 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-c
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1, 48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
90 dB
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
90 dB
This microphone has a DAC SNR of 90 dB which is lower than that of 51.4% of microphones and equal to that of 8.6% of microphones.
A-weighted.
Show more
N. of polar patterns
4
N. of polar patterns
4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 4, which is higher than that of 87.9% of microphones and equal to that of 11.1% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 25.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
yes
Bidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports a bidirectional pickup pattern. 16.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
250 mm
Height
250 mm
This microphone is 250 mm tall, which is taller than 87.2% of microphones and equal in height to 2.6% of microphones.
Width
54 mm
Width
54 mm
This microphone is 54 mm wide, which is narrower than 60% of microphones and equal in width to 2.6% of microphones.
Thickness
103 mm
Thickness
103 mm
This microphone is 103 mm thick, which is thicker than 84.2% of microphones and equal in thickness to 1.6% of microphones.
Weight
710 g
Weight
710 g
This microphone weighs 710 g, which is heavier than 67.2% of microphones and equal in weight to 1.6% of microphones.
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
stand; cable; mount adapter
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
3 m
Cable length
3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 3 m which is longer than that of 81.3% of microphones and equal to that of 14.4% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

HyperX QuadCast S vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3 m vs 2 m
  • Includes RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    yes
    This microphone includes RGB lighting, the average microphone does not.
  • 15.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast S
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast S has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.30 vs 8.027).
    9.3 vs 8.03
  • 7.6% better value for money
    HyperX QuadCast S has a higher value-for-money score than the average microphone (8.54 vs 7.9).
    8.54 vs 7.94
  • 15.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast S
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast S has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.30 vs 8.027).
    9.3 vs 8.03
  • 7.6% better value for money
    HyperX QuadCast S has a higher value-for-money score than the average microphone (8.54 vs 7.9).
    8.54 vs 7.94
  • 46.1% more popular
    HyperX QuadCast S has a higher popularity than the average microphone (9.09 vs 6.2).
    9.09 vs 6.22
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    yes
    This microphone includes RGB lighting, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3 m vs 2 m
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 37 mW lower headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    7 mW
    This microphone has a lower headphone output power than the average microphone (7 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    7 mW vs 44 mW
  • 47 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    103 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 65 mm taller body
    Height
    250 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (250 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    250 mm vs 185 mm
  • 28.4% heavier
    Weight
    710 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (710 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    710 g vs 553 g
  • 2x more expensive
    HyperX QuadCast S is more expensive than the average microphone (£140 vs £70).
    £140 vs £70
  • 1.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    90 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (90 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    A-weighted.
    90 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 2x more expensive
    HyperX QuadCast S is more expensive than the average microphone (£140 vs £70).
    £140 vs £70
  • 37 mW lower headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    7 mW
    This microphone has a lower headphone output power than the average microphone (7 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    7 mW vs 44 mW
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 1.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    90 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (90 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    A-weighted.
    90 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 47 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    103 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 65 mm taller body
    Height
    250 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (250 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    250 mm vs 185 mm
  • 28.4% heavier
    Weight
    710 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (710 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    710 g vs 553 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
28/09/2020
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
28/03/2022
Summary of the review
S
soundguys.com
16/05/2025
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
14/05/2022
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
28/09/2020
Summary of the review
G
gamingtrend.com
18/10/2022
Summary of the review
Z
zdnet.com
12/04/2022
Summary of the review
N
nichegamer.com
29/12/2022
Summary of the review
C
cgmagonline.com
13/07/2021
Summary of the review
G
geekdad.com
10/10/2020
Summary of the review
T
thesixthaxis.com
09/02/2021
Summary of the review
X
xander51.medium.com
15/10/2020
Summary of the review
S
sea.ign.com
25/11/2020
Summary of the review
P
prosettings.net
26/11/2020
Summary of the review
R
reviews.org
08/12/2021
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
28/09/2020
Summary of the review
H
hardwareinside.de
18/12/2020
Summary of the review
G
gamezoom.net
07/12/2020
Summary of the review
M
mikrofon-test-podcast.de
01/03/2023
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
14/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
charlestech.fr
25/05/2024
Summary of the review
H
hobbyconsolas.com
17/12/2022
Summary of the review
C
cuatro.com
09/10/2020
Summary of the review
E
elcomercio.pe
26/04/2021
Summary of the review
G
gamescore.it
21/12/2020
Summary of the review
N
nl.mashable.com
02/01/2023
Summary of the review
T
techgaming.nl
24/04/2023
Summary of the review
G
gadgetgear.nl
21/11/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 6,891 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about HyperX QuadCast S

  • Excellent sound quality that is clear and natural for gaming, streaming, and voice recording
  • Highly customizable RGB lighting with dynamic effects that add visual flair to streaming setups
  • Convenient tap-to-mute sensor with an LED status indicator for quick visual confirmation
  • Versatile with four selectable polar patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo) for various recording scenarios
  • Includes a built-in anti-vibration shock mount and a pop filter to reduce unwanted noise
  • Plug-and-play simplicity via USB-C connection, compatible with PC, Mac, and consoles like PS4/PS5

What we don't like about HyperX QuadCast S

  • The internal pop filter can be subpar, sometimes requiring an external one to handle plosives at close range
  • Tap-to-mute button is highly sensitive and can be accidentally triggered by a slight graze
  • The USB-C and headphone jack placement can be awkward, making it difficult to fit thicker headphone plugs
  • NGENUITY software for light customization is only available on PC
  • Large and heavy physical design makes it less portable and requires a sturdy mounting solution
  • Limited to 48kHz/16-bit recording, which may not satisfy high-end audiophile or professional studio requirements

Verdict

The HyperX QuadCast S is a high-performance USB electret condenser microphone featuring a tri-capsule array that supports four selectable polar patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. It offers 16-bit/48kHz resolution with a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz and includes a 3.5mm headphone jack for real-time monitoring. Key advantages include its vibrant dual-zone customizable RGB lighting, a convenient tap-to-mute sensor with an LED status indicator, a built-in pop filter, and an included anti-vibration shock mount. However, some drawbacks include its bulky design that may be difficult to mount on smaller boom arms, a highly sensitive mute button prone to accidental triggers, and its limitation to 48kHz sampling which may not satisfy extreme audiophiles.

Compare HyperX QuadCast S with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HyperX QuadCast S and other products in the Microphones category

No results found