Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

HyperX QuadCast Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:122 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1, 48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-C

HyperX QuadCast Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.2

Overall score

Score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

75%

7.6

Technical score

25%

9.7

User score

★Better than 95% of microphones
7.6

Technical score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.9

Audio Performance

20%

5.2

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

5.4

Connectivity

3%

6.3

Design

3%

10

Accessories

â–²Better than 86% of microphones
9.7

User score

User score
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 73,116 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 99% of microphones
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
  • hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast
hyperx-quadcast

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone HyperX QuadCast

Technical score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.9

Audio Performance

20%

5.2

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

7.5

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

5.4

Connectivity

3%

6.3

Design

3%

10

Accessories

7.6
User score
User score
9.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.6

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 73,116 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.7
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HyperX QuadCast has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than 90.5% of microphones.
10
Value for money
Value for money
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.7
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
14 mm
Capsule type
triple
Sensitivity
-36 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-C
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1, 48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
90 dB
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
90 dB
This microphone has a DAC SNR of 90 dB which is lower than that of 51.4% of microphones and equal to that of 8.6% of microphones.
Show more
N. of polar patterns
4
N. of polar patterns
4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 4, which is higher than that of 87.9% of microphones and equal to that of 11.1% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 25.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
yes
Bidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports a bidirectional pickup pattern. 16.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
249.4 mm
Height
249.4 mm
This microphone is 249.4 mm tall, which is taller than 86.2% of microphones.
Width
50 mm
Width
50 mm
This microphone is 50 mm wide, which is narrower than 75.9% of microphones and equal in width to 8.7% of microphones.
Thickness
50 mm
Thickness
50 mm
This microphone is 50 mm thick, which is thinner than 73.7% of microphones and equal in thickness to 7.9% of microphones.
Weight
710 g
Weight
710 g
This microphone weighs 710 g, which is heavier than 67.2% of microphones and equal in weight to 1.6% of microphones.
With included stand.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Included accessories
stand; cable; mount adapter
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
yes
Windscreen included
yes
This microphone includes a windscreen. 31.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
3 m
Cable length
3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 3 m which is longer than that of 81.3% of microphones and equal to that of 14.4% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

HyperX QuadCast vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3 m vs 2 m
  • 21% higher user score
    User score
    9.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.72 vs 8.027).
    9.72 vs 8.03
  • 60.7% more popular
    HyperX QuadCast has a higher popularity than the average microphone (10 vs 6.2).
    10 vs 6.22
  • 21% higher user score
    User score
    9.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast has a higher user score than the average microphone (9.72 vs 8.027).
    9.72 vs 8.03
  • 60.7% more popular
    HyperX QuadCast has a higher popularity than the average microphone (10 vs 6.2).
    10 vs 6.22
  • 9.7% better value for money
    HyperX QuadCast has a higher value-for-money score than the average microphone (8.71 vs 7.9).
    8.71 vs 7.94
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • 6 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    50 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (50 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    50 mm vs 56 mm
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3 m vs 2 m
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 37 mW lower headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    7 mW
    This microphone has a lower headphone output power than the average microphone (7 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    7 mW vs 44 mW
  • 64.4 mm taller body
    Height
    249.4 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (249.4 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    249.4 mm vs 185 mm
  • 28.4% heavier
    Weight
    710 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (710 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    710 g vs 553 g
  • 1.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    90 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (90 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    90 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 1 older release date
    Release date
    2019
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2019 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    March 2019.
    2019 vs 2020
  • 37 mW lower headphone output power
    Headphone output power
    7 mW
    This microphone has a lower headphone output power than the average microphone (7 mW vs 44 mW). The average microphone has a headphone output power of 44 mW.
    7 mW vs 44 mW
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 1.5 dB lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    90 dB
    This microphone has a lower DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (90 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    90 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 64.4 mm taller body
    Height
    249.4 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (249.4 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    249.4 mm vs 185 mm
  • 28.4% heavier
    Weight
    710 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (710 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    710 g vs 553 g
  • 1 older release date
    Release date
    2019
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2019 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    March 2019.
    2019 vs 2020

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
ign.com
28/03/2022
Summary of the review
S
soundguys.com
05/11/2024
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
25/03/2019
Summary of the review
M
mixmicroo.com
22/01/2026
Summary of the review
W
windowscentral.com
12/08/2020
Summary of the review
M
me.ign.com
27/03/2019
Summary of the review
G
games.ch
26/03/2019
Summary of the review
G
gamertech.fr
18/05/2020
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
20/08/2019
Summary of the review
I
irrompibles.net
29/05/2019
Summary of the review
F
fhgamer.ar
09/11/2021
Summary of the review
C
culturageek.com.ar
10/05/2019
Summary of the review
R
robadainformatici.it
28/03/2026
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
28/09/2025
Summary of the review
T
techgaming.nl
24/04/2023
Summary of the review
T
techgaming.nl
28/01/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 73,116 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about HyperX QuadCast

  • Excellent sound quality for gaming and streaming
  • Helpful tap-to-mute sensor with LED status indicator
  • Four selectable polar patterns for versatile recording
  • Comes with a built-in pop filter and anti-vibration shock mount
  • Easy plug-and-play USB setup on PC, Mac, and consoles
  • Convenient gain control dial at the bottom of the mic

What we don't like about HyperX QuadCast

  • High sensitivity can pick up background noise if not adjusted
  • Limited to 48kHz/16-bit resolution (not professional studio grade)
  • Shock mount is primarily made of plastic, which some find cheap
  • Large size can be obtrusive on smaller desk setups
  • Lighting cannot be turned off unless the microphone is muted
  • No XLR connectivity, making it harder to upgrade in professional setups

Verdict

The HyperX QuadCast is a professional-grade USB condenser microphone featuring a triple 14mm capsule array that supports four selectable polar patterns: cardioid, bidirectional, omnidirectional, and stereo. It operates with a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz and a sample rate of 48kHz at 16-bit depth, making it a highly versatile choice for streaming, podcasting, and gaming. Key pros include its integrated anti-vibration shock mount, built-in pop filter, a convenient tap-to-mute sensor with an LED status indicator, and a dedicated gain control dial for on-the-fly sensitivity adjustments. However, notable cons include its bulky design, which can take up significant desk space, and the high sensitivity of the microphone which may pick up unwanted background noise like mechanical keyboard clicks even in cardioid mode.

Compare HyperX QuadCast with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HyperX QuadCast and other products in the Microphones category

No results found