Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

HyperX QuadCast 2 Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Connection type:USBTransducer type:electret condenserMax SPL:120 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1, 48, 96 kHzOutput connector type:USB-c

HyperX QuadCast 2 Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

75%

8.4

Technical score

25%

?

User score

★Better than 98% of microphones
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.1

Audio Performance

20%

8.0

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

8.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

6.0

Design

3%

8.5

Accessories

★Better than 98% of microphones
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £130

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone HyperX QuadCast 2

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.1

Audio Performance

20%

8.0

Recording

16%

8.6

Pickup Patterns

16%

8.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

6.0

Design

3%

8.5

Accessories

8.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
HyperX QuadCast 2 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 68.3% of microphones.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.4

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

8.8
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
electret condenser
Diaphragm size
14 mm
Capsule type
triple
Sensitivity
?
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-c
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1, 48, 96 kHz
Supported bit depths
24 bit
Audio interface sample rate
96 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
96 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 96 kHz which is higher than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 24% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
24 bit
Audio interface bit depth
24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 24 bit which is higher than that of 42.1% of microphones and equal to that of 56.7% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
100 dB
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
100 dB
This microphone has a DAC SNR of 100 dB which is higher than that of 80% of microphones and equal to that of 14.3% of microphones.
A-weighted.
Show more
N. of polar patterns
4
N. of polar patterns
4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 4, which is higher than that of 87.9% of microphones and equal to that of 11.1% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
Omnidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 25.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
yes
Bidirectional pattern
yes
This microphone supports a bidirectional pickup pattern. 16.6% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
212.7 mm
Height
212.7 mm
This microphone is 212.7 mm tall, which is taller than 71.8% of microphones.
Width
53.98 mm
Width
53.98 mm
This microphone is 53.98 mm wide, which is narrower than 63.1% of microphones.
Thickness
103 mm
Thickness
103 mm
This microphone is 103 mm thick, which is thicker than 84.2% of microphones and equal in thickness to 1.6% of microphones.
Weight
819 g
Weight
819 g
This microphone weighs 819 g, which is heavier than 77.6% of microphones.
Body material
aluminum
Show more
Included accessories
stand; shock mount; cable
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
3 m
Cable length
3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 3 m which is longer than that of 81.3% of microphones and equal to that of 14.4% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
Via USB-C or OTG.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

HyperX QuadCast 2 vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • 18.5 dB higher signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    100 dB
    This microphone has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (100 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    100 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes mix control
    Mix control
    yes
    This microphone includes mix control, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes high-pass filter
    High-pass filter
    yes
    This microphone includes a high-pass filter, the average microphone does not.
  • 8.5 dB higher DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    100 dB
    This microphone has a higher DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (100 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    A-weighted.
    100 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 48 kHz higher interface sample rate
    Audio interface sample rate
    96 kHz
    This microphone supports a higher audio interface sample rate than the average microphone (96 kHz vs 48 kHz). The average microphone audio interface supports 48 kHz.
    96 kHz vs 48 kHz
  • 11.3% better value for money
    HyperX QuadCast 2 has a higher value-for-money score than the average microphone (8.84 vs 7.9).
    8.84 vs 7.94
  • 18.5 dB higher signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    100 dB
    This microphone has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (100 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    100 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • Includes mix control
    Mix control
    yes
    This microphone includes mix control, the average microphone does not.
  • 8.5 dB higher DAC signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
    100 dB
    This microphone has a higher DAC signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (100 dB vs 91.5 dB). The average microphone DAC has a signal-to-noise ratio of 91.5 dB.
    A-weighted.
    100 dB vs 91.5 dB
  • 48 kHz higher interface sample rate
    Audio interface sample rate
    96 kHz
    This microphone supports a higher audio interface sample rate than the average microphone (96 kHz vs 48 kHz). The average microphone audio interface supports 48 kHz.
    96 kHz vs 48 kHz
  • 3 more polar patterns
    N. of polar patterns
    4
    This microphone has more polar patterns than the average microphone (4 vs 1). The average microphone offers 1 polar patterns.
    4 vs 1
  • Supports omnidirectional pickup
    Omnidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports omnidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Supports bidirectional pickup
    Bidirectional pattern
    yes
    This microphone supports bidirectional pickup, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes high-pass filter
    High-pass filter
    yes
    This microphone includes a high-pass filter, the average microphone does not.
  • 4 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    This microphone is newer than the average microphone (2024 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    2024 vs 2020
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3 m vs 2 m
  • 48.1% heavier
    Weight
    819 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (819 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    819 g vs 553 g
  • 1 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    120 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 47 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    103 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 6.22x less popular
    HyperX QuadCast 2 has a lower popularity than the average microphone (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.22
  • 27.7 mm taller body
    Height
    212.7 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (212.7 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    212.7 mm vs 185 mm
  • 85.7% more expensive
    HyperX QuadCast 2 is more expensive than the average microphone (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast 2
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast 2 has a lower user score than the average microphone (8.00 vs 8.027).
    8 vs 8.03
  • 6.22x less popular
    HyperX QuadCast 2 has a lower popularity than the average microphone (1 vs 6.2).
    1 vs 6.22
  • 85.7% more expensive
    HyperX QuadCast 2 is more expensive than the average microphone (£130 vs £70).
    £130 vs £70
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    HyperX QuadCast 2
    the average microphone
    HyperX QuadCast 2 has a lower user score than the average microphone (8.00 vs 8.027).
    8 vs 8.03
  • 1 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    120 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 48.1% heavier
    Weight
    819 g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (819 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    819 g vs 553 g
  • 47 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    103 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (103 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    103 mm vs 56 mm
  • 27.7 mm taller body
    Height
    212.7 mm
    This microphone is taller than the average microphone (212.7 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    212.7 mm vs 185 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcworld.com
08/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
10/11/2024
Summary of the review
P
podcastage.com
21/01/2025
Summary of the review
T
techstomper.com
17/07/2025
Summary of the review
H
hitechcentury.com
21/10/2025
Summary of the review
I
irishexaminer.com
23/10/2025
Summary of the review
S
sifter.com.au
10/11/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamingbible.com
23/10/2024
Summary of the review
S
seriousinsights.net
22/08/2024
Summary of the review
C
cubed3.com
23/11/2024
Summary of the review
P
podcasts.apple.com
21/01/2025
Summary of the review
D
delamar.de
20/08/2024
Summary of the review
G
game2gether.de
20/08/2024
Summary of the review
C
cerealkillerz.org
12/08/2025
Summary of the review
L
lasonophonie.fr
19/05/2025
Summary of the review
E
eltiempo.com
22/08/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.es
08 de noviembre de 2024
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com.co
17/02/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.it
08/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
techgaming.nl
28/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
planetzone.nl
09/02/2025
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
28/09/2025
Summary of the review
G
gamereactor.nl
08/11/2024
Summary of the review
I
inthegame.nl
19/12/2024
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about HyperX QuadCast 2

  • High-quality 24-bit/96kHz audio with warm, natural vocal reproduction
  • Highly responsive tap-to-mute sensor with clear LED status indicator
  • Versatile with four selectable polar patterns (cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo)
  • Durable premium build quality featuring a heavy aluminum body
  • Effective integrated anti-vibration shock mount to reduce desk noise
  • Simple plug-and-play setup for PC, Mac, and PlayStation consoles

What we don't like about HyperX QuadCast 2

  • Software (NGENUITY) for lighting and setting customization is currently only compatible with Windows
  • Standard model lacks full RGB customization (red-only or frost-blue depending on the variant)
  • Control dial can produce audible clicks that may be picked up during live recording
  • Highly sensitive condenser design often requires additional filters or software for background noise suppression
  • Premium price point is considered high for a USB-only microphone
  • Internal pop filter can struggle with harsh plosives, sometimes requiring an external one
  • Bulky physical size and heavy weight may be difficult for small desk setups

Verdict

The HyperX QuadCast 2 is a high-resolution USB condenser microphone featuring three 14mm electret capsules and upgraded studio-quality recording specs of 24-bit/96kHz. It maintains its iconic sleek aluminum design with a built-in anti-vibration shock mount, internal pop filter, and a signature red lighting indicator. Key characteristics include four selectable polar patterns—cardioid, omnidirectional, bidirectional, and stereo—and a new multifunction knob for on-board control of gain, playback volume, and monitoring. Pros include its user-friendly tap-to-mute sensor, versatile plug-and-play USB-C connectivity, and excellent vocal clarity with a 20Hz–20kHz frequency response. However, common cons include its premium price point compared to entry-level USB mics, the lack of 32-bit float recording found in some competitors, and internal pop filtering that may still require an external shield for aggressive plosives.

Compare HyperX QuadCast 2 with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HyperX QuadCast 2 and other products in the Microphones category

No results found