OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

FIFINE K670 Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:120 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1, 48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-b

FIFINE K670 Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.5

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

75%

5.8

Technical score

25%

8.8

User score

▼Worse than 75% of microphones
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

20%

4.1

Audio Performance

20%

5.4

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

6.6

Design

3%

4.2

Accessories

▼Worse than 85% of microphones
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 4,674 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 72% of microphones
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
  • fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670
fifine-k670

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone FIFINE K670

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

20%

4.1

Audio Performance

20%

5.4

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

6.5

Connectivity

3%

6.6

Design

3%

4.2

Accessories

5.8
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 4,674 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.8
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 80% of models
Popularity:
FIFINE K670 has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than 80.4% of microphones.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

6.5

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
16 mm
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-46 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-b
Headphone output
yes
Headphone output
yes
▲ Better than 38% of models
This microphone includes a headphone output. 62.3% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1, 48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
▼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
▼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
?
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
▼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
▲ Better than 9% of models
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
▼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
no
Mute function
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This microphone does not include a mute function. 68.3% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
yes
Onboard gain control
yes
▲ Better than 49% of models
This microphone includes onboard gain control. 50.8% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
1
Volume control levels
1
▲ Better than 35% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 1 which is higher than that of 34.9% of microphones and equal to that of 49.5% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
▼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
▼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
▲ Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
▲ Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
130 mm
Height
130 mm
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 130 mm tall, which is shorter than 90.3% of microphones and equal in height to 1% of microphones.
Width
48 mm
Width
48 mm
▲ Better than 87% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 48 mm wide, which is narrower than 86.7% of microphones and equal in width to 3.6% of microphones.
Thickness
41.8 mm
Thickness
41.8 mm
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 41.8 mm thick, which is thinner than 94.2% of microphones.
Weight
890 g
Weight
890 g
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
This microphone weighs 890 g, which is heavier than 82.4% of microphones and equal in weight to 0.8% of microphones.
With included stand.
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
stand; cable; mount adapter
Shock mount included
no
Shock mount included
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This microphone does not include a shock mount. 49.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
no
Pop filter included
no
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This microphone does not include a pop filter. 60.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
▼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
2 m
Cable length
2 m
▼ Worse than 39% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 2 m which is longer than that of 36.3% of microphones and equal to that of 25% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
▲ Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
▲ Better than 39% of models
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
▲ Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

FIFINE K670 vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 55 mm shorter body
    Height
    130 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (130 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    130 mm vs 185 mm
  • 14.2 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    41.8 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (41.8 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    41.8 mm vs 56 mm
  • 55 mm shorter body
    Height
    130 mm
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (130 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    130 mm vs 185 mm
  • 14.2 mm thinner body
    Thickness
    41.8 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thinner than the average microphone (41.8 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    41.8 mm vs 56 mm
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • 5,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    15,000 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (15000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    15,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 15.5 dB lower signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    66 dB
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (66 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    66 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • 30 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    50 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (50 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    50 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 30 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    66 dB
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (66 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    66 dB vs 96 dB
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • 60.9% heavier
    Weight
    890 g
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (890 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    890 g vs 553 g
  • 5% worse value for money
    FIFINE K670 has a lower value-for-money score than the average microphone (7.56 vs 7.9).
    7.56 vs 7.94
  • 5,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    15,000 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (15000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    15,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 15.5 dB lower signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    66 dB
    ▼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (66 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    66 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • 30 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    50 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (50 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    50 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 30 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    66 dB
    ▼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (66 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    66 dB vs 96 dB
  • 1 dB SPL lower limit
    Max SPL
    120 dB SPL
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a lower max SPL than the average microphone (120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    120 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • 60.9% heavier
    Weight
    890 g
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <226.8 g – >1k g
    This microphone is heavier than the average microphone (890 g vs 553 g). The average microphone weighs 553 g.
    With included stand.
    890 g vs 553 g
  • 2 older release date
    Release date
    2018
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2018 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    May 2018.
    2018 vs 2020
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
podcastage.com
08/01/2019
Summary of the review
FiFine K670Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. USB Microphone Review / Test
S
socialmaharaj.com
17/07/2020
Summary of the review
Fifine K670 Review - Best Budget Microphone in India Podcastage
1
13db.de
14/11/2021
Summary of the review
USB microphones for streaming and gaming
(Translated)Show original
M
mizine.de
29/12/2022
Summary of the review
How to connect a USB microphone to an iPhone", "Connecting a USB microphone to an iPhone: A step-by-step guide
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.mictests.com
20/04/2021
Summary of the review
Review #11748 on “fifine k670” | Microphone Review
(Translated)Show original
F
fr.mictests.com
20/01/2022
Summary of the review
Review #18291 on “FIFINE K670” | Microphone Review
(Translated)Show original
I
ipdtl.com
15/03/2021
Summary of the review
USB Mic Reviews: In-Depth Test of the Fifine K670", "Are you planning to use this for streaming or podcasting?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,674 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about FIFINE K670

  • Excellent value for the price, often compared to more expensive mics like the Blue Yeti
  • Solid all-metal build quality that feels durable and professional
  • Crystal clear audio quality suitable for podcasting, streaming, and voiceovers
  • Convenient physical gain control knob for real-time volume adjustments
  • Built-in 3.5mm headphone jack for zero-latency monitoring
  • Stable, heavy metal desktop stand with adjustable height poles
  • Simple plug-and-play setup for Windows and Mac systems

What we don't like about FIFINE K670

  • Highly sensitive to plosive sounds (p-pops), often requiring an external pop filter
  • The high end can sound overly boosted or harsh, which may lead to listener fatigue
  • Headphone amp quality is noted as noisy or having a constant hiss by some users
  • Lacks a dedicated physical mute button
  • Condenser capsule picks up significant background noise (e.g., fans, keyboard clicks) if gain is too high
  • Known driver detection issues on some systems, sometimes appearing as 'mic_test'
  • The monitoring volume in the headphones is tied directly to the microphone's gain knob

Verdict

The Fifine K670 is a large-diaphragm (16mm) cardioid condenser USB microphone designed for plug-and-play use on Windows, Mac, and PS4. It features a frequency response of 50Hz–15kHz, a sensitivity of -46±3dB, and a 66dB signal-to-noise ratio, supporting 16-bit/48kHz audio quality. Main characteristics include a durable all-metal body, an integrated blue LED power indicator, and a detachable height-adjustable desktop stand. Its primary pros are a convenient physical gain knob for real-time input adjustment and a built-in 3.5mm headphone jack for zero-latency monitoring. However, notable cons include a lack of a dedicated mute button, high sensitivity that may require a separate pop filter to manage plosives, and a headphone amp that some users report can be slightly noisy at high gain levels.

Compare FIFINE K670 with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of FIFINE K670 and other products in the Microphones category

No results found