OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

FIFINE K651 Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Connection type:USBTransducer type:dynamicMax SPL:?Supported sample rates:48 kHzOutput connector type:USB-c

FIFINE K651 Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.7

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

75%

6.1

Technical score

25%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 65% of microphones
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

20%

4.6

Audio Performance

20%

6.3

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

8.1

Design

3%

9.7

Accessories

â–¼Worse than 74% of microphones
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 1,067 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 64% of microphones
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
  • fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651
fifine-k651

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone FIFINE K651

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

20%

4.6

Audio Performance

20%

6.3

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

6.4

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

10

Compatibility

5%

4.0

Connectivity

3%

8.1

Design

3%

9.7

Accessories

6.1
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 1,067 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Popularity:
FIFINE K651 has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than 59.3% of microphones.
7.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

60%

6.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.7
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
dynamic
Diaphragm size
?
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-40 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB-c
Headphone output
no
Headphone output
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a headphone output. 62.8% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
no
3.5 mm audio jack
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack. 63.3% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
48 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
48 kHz
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 48 kHz which is higher than that of 2.3% of microphones and equal to that of 55.6% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
N/A
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
yes
Mute function
yes
â–² Better than 32% of models
This microphone includes a mute function. 67.8% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
no
Onboard gain control
no
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This microphone does not include onboard gain control. 51.3% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
0
Volume control levels
0
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 0 which is lower than that of 65.7% of microphones and equal to that of 34.3% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
142 mm
Height
142 mm
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 142 mm tall, which is shorter than 86.2% of microphones and equal in height to 0.5% of microphones.
Width
55 mm
Width
55 mm
â–² Better than 53% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 55 mm wide, which is narrower than 53.3% of microphones and equal in width to 5.1% of microphones.
Thickness
105 mm
Thickness
105 mm
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 105 mm thick, which is thicker than 86.8% of microphones and equal in thickness to 0.5% of microphones.
Weight
?
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
boom arm; desk clamp; shock mount; windscreen; mount adapter
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
yes
Pop filter included
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This microphone includes a pop filter. 60.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
yes
Windscreen included
yes
â–² Better than 69% of models
This microphone includes a windscreen. 31.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
2.5 m
Cable length
2.5 m
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 2.5 m which is longer than that of 63.1% of microphones and equal to that of 15% of microphones.
Android compatibility
yes
Android compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 34% of models
This microphone is compatible with Android. 65.8% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
yes
iOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This microphone is compatible with iOS. 61.3% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

FIFINE K651 vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • Supports loopback audio
    Loopback support
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This microphone supports loopback audio, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes LED level indicator
    LED level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This microphone includes an LED level indicator, the average microphone does not.
  • 43 mm shorter body
    Height
    142 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (142 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    142 mm vs 185 mm
  • 2 newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is newer than the average microphone (2022 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    January 2022.
    2022 vs 2020
  • Supports loopback audio
    Loopback support
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This microphone supports loopback audio, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes LED level indicator
    LED level indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This microphone includes an LED level indicator, the average microphone does not.
  • 43 mm shorter body
    Height
    142 mm
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
    This microphone is shorter than the average microphone (142 mm vs 185 mm). The average microphone has a height of 185 mm.
    142 mm vs 185 mm
  • 2 newer release date
    Release date
    2022
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is newer than the average microphone (2022 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    January 2022.
    2022 vs 2020
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • Includes windscreen
    Windscreen included
    yes
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    This microphone includes a windscreen, the average microphone does not.
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 90 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    110 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (110 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    110 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 5,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    15,000 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (15000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    15,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 11.5 dB lower signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    70 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (70 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    70 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • 20.96 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    75.04 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (75 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    75.04 dB vs 96 dB
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • 90 Hz higher low-frequency limit
    Lowest frequency
    110 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    Market range: <20 Hz – >50 Hz
    This microphone has a higher low-frequency cutoff than the average microphone (110 Hz vs 20 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a low-frequency limit of 20 Hz.
    110 Hz vs 20 Hz
  • 5,000 Hz lower high-frequency limit
    Highest frequency
    15,000 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <15k Hz – >20k Hz
    This microphone has a lower high-frequency limit than the average microphone (15000 Hz vs 20000 Hz). By comparison, the average microphone has a high-frequency limit of 20000 Hz.
    15,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 11.5 dB lower signal-to-noise ratio
    Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)
    70 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <70 dB – >100 dB
    This microphone has a lower signal-to-noise ratio than the average microphone (70 dB vs 81.5 dB). The average microphone has a signal-to-noise ratio of 81.5 dB.
    70 dB vs 81.5 dB
  • 20.96 dB narrower dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    75.04 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a narrower dynamic range than the average microphone (75 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    75.04 dB vs 96 dB
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No 3.5 mm jack
    3.5 mm audio jack
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a 3.5 mm jack, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 49 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    105 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (105 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    105 mm vs 56 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
obli.net
07/03/2022
Summary of the review
Fifine K651 AmpliRocket Review – Dynamic USB microphone with unique accessories and RGB", "Fifine K651 AmpliRocket Tested – Dynamic USB microphone wit...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,067 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about FIFINE K651

  • Excellent value for the price, often cited as a top budget 'starter kit' for streaming and gaming.
  • Comes with a comprehensive bundle including a sturdy boom arm, shock mount, and metal desk clamp.
  • Dynamic cardioid capsule provides good background noise rejection and minimizes keyboard clicks.
  • Features attractive and customizable RGB lighting on the shock mount with eight different styles.
  • Convenient tap-to-mute functionality with visual LED indicators (smiling face icons).
  • Solid metal construction that feels higher quality than its price suggests.
  • Simple plug-and-play setup via USB-C with no additional drivers required.

What we don't like about FIFINE K651

  • The capacitive touch-to-mute button can be unresponsive or fail after several months of use.
  • Lacks physical onboard gain or volume control knobs, requiring adjustments through OS settings.
  • Does not have a built-in 3.5mm headphone jack for direct zero-latency monitoring.
  • Can sound too quiet for some users, leading to static noise when applying heavy digital gain filters.
  • Requires two separate USB ports if you want to power both the microphone and the RGB shock mount lights.
  • Not compatible with Xbox consoles or most smartphones without specific adapters.
  • Relatively large physical size may be cumbersome for users with limited desk space.

Verdict

The Fifine K651, also known as the Amplirocket, is a budget-friendly USB dynamic microphone kit designed specifically for gaming and streaming. It features a unidirectional cardioid pickup pattern, a frequency response of 110Hz to 15kHz, and a sensitivity of -40±3dB, making it effective at isolating voices while minimizing background noise. The rugged metal microphone includes a touch-sensitive mute button with LED indicators and is bundled with an adjustable boom arm and an RGB-lit shock mount that offers eight lighting modes. Its main pros include high-quality close-up vocal clarity, a comprehensive all-in-one setup for beginners, and plug-and-play compatibility with PC, Mac, and PlayStation consoles. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in gain knob or headphone jack for zero-latency monitoring, and the requirement of two separate USB cables to power both the microphone and the RGB shock mount simultaneously.

Compare FIFINE K651 with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of FIFINE K651 and other products in the Microphones category

No results found