OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connectivity:wirelessMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:2600 DPIWeight:85 g

Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

80%

5.0

Technical Score

20%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of mice
5.0

Technical Score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

36%

3.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

7.0

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

9.8

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 66% of mice
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 320,399 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
★Better than 94% of mice
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
  • tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic
tecknet-pro-2-4g-ergonomic

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic Wireless Mouse is a right-handed peripheral featuring a stable 2.4GHz connection with a 15-metre range and a customisable optical sensor offering 6 DPI levels: 800, 1200, 1600, 2400, 3200, and 4800. Its main characteristics include a 6-button layout, a dedicated DPI switch, and an energy-efficient design that provides up to 30 months of battery life using two AAA batteries. Key pros include its comfortable contoured shape with a textured rubber thumb rest, reliable plug-and-play setup via a Nano USB receiver, and smooth gliding feet for precise tracking. However, main cons include a lack of Bluetooth connectivity and the fact that it is not rechargeable, requiring periodic physical battery replacements.

Technical Specifications of mouse Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic

Technical Score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components:

36%

3.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

7.0

Design

14%

1.9

Features

7%

9.6

Connectivity

5%

9.8

Battery & Charging

5.0
Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a technical score of 5 points, which is lower than that of 66.5% of products in this category.
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 94% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on 320,399 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
9.3
Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a user score of 9.3 points, which is higher than that of 93.8% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.5% of products in this category.
10
Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.5% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.1
Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a value-for-money score of 7.1 points, which is lower than that of 56.4% of products in this category.
Brand name
Tecknet
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
Connectivity
wireless
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This mouse supports wireless connectivity, which is more versatile than 35% of mice and equal to 21.7% of mice.
connection modes: Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
700 mAh
Battery capacity
700 mAh
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 700 mAh, which is larger than 80.9% of mice and equal to 2.7% of mice.
Battery form factor
AAA
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 78% of models
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
?
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
85 g
Weight
85 g
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 85 g, which is heavier than 52.7% of mice and equal to 2.2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
N/A
Firmware upgradable
no
Firmware upgradable
no
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 0.5 hours shorter full charge time
    Full charge time
    1.5 hours
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 1.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 16.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.30 vs 8.000).
    9.3 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 75% cheaper
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • 16.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic has a higher user score than the average mouse (9.30 vs 8.000).
    9.3 vs 8
  • 56.6% more popular
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic is more popular than the average mouse (10 vs 6.4).
    10 vs 6.38
  • 75% cheaper
    Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 0.5 hours shorter full charge time
    Full charge time
    1.5 hours
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 1.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    1.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    10 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 74% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 74% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,600 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2600 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,600 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    10 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 3.7% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    85 g
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 85 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    85 g vs 82 g
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2015
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse has a release date of 2015, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    2015 vs 2021
  • No firmware upgrades
    Firmware upgradable
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Graphic comparison of Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 320,399 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic?

  • Excellent value for money and highly budget-friendly
  • Comfortable ergonomic design that fits well in the hand and reduces wrist strain
  • Impressive battery life lasting up to 24-30 months
  • Convenient plug-and-play setup with zero drivers required
  • Multiple adjustable DPI levels for customizable tracking speeds
  • Handy side buttons for quick forward and backward web navigation
  • Smooth gliding and precise cursor control on a wide variety of surfaces
  • Secure built-in storage compartment for the USB nano receiver

What customers dislike about Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic?

  • Batteries are not included in the box
  • Build quality can feel somewhat cheap and lightweight due to thin plastic
  • Clicking sound can be noticeably loud and harsh rather than silent
  • Lacks support for infinite scrolling or free-spinning scroll wheel motion
  • Occasional cursor lag or stuttering reported by some users over time
  • Buttons cannot be extensively reprogrammed via dedicated software
  • The receiver slot's magnet can occasionally feel too loose to some users

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Tecknet Pro 2.4G Ergonomic with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)