OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Redragon M991 Wireless Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:26000 DPIWeight:122 g

Redragon M991 Wireless Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

80%

6.8

Technical Score

20%

8.5

User score

â–²Better than 71% of mice
6.8

Technical Score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

36%

6.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

5.0

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

9.8

Connectivity

5%

6.3

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 69% of mice
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 1,932 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 71% of mice
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
  • redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless
redragon-m991-wireless

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Redragon M991 Wireless (Enlightenment) is a right-handed ergonomic gaming mouse featuring a high-precision PixArt PAW3370 optical sensor with up to 19,000 DPI, 400 IPS tracking speed, and 50G acceleration. It offers dual-mode connectivity via 2.4GHz wireless and a braided USB-C wired connection, supported by a 1000mAh rechargeable battery that provides up to 45 hours of use (or up to 80 hours in Eco mode). The device is equipped with 9 programmable buttons, including a dedicated rapid-fire key, and features customizable 16.8 million color RGB lighting across the scroll wheel, logo, and side strips. Main pros include its versatile macro customization, solid build quality with 20-million click Huano switches, and comfortable grip for palm or claw styles; however, notable cons include a relatively heavy weight of approximately 122g-130g, thin skates that can feel scratchy, and reports of occasional latency or lag during intensive wireless gaming.

Technical Specifications of mouse Redragon M991 Wireless

Technical Score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components:

36%

6.6

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.7

Controls

16%

5.0

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

9.8

Connectivity

5%

6.3

Battery & Charging

6.8
Redragon M991 Wireless has a technical score of 6.8 points, which is higher than that of 68.6% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.5

Number of reviews

Based on 1,932 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
Redragon M991 Wireless has a user score of 8.52 points, which is higher than that of 71% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Popularity:
Redragon M991 Wireless has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 65.7% of products in this category.
7.5
Redragon M991 Wireless has a popularity score of 7.5 points, which is higher than that of 65.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Redragon M991 Wireless has a value-for-money score of 8 points, which is higher than that of 70.5% of products in this category.
Brand name
Redragon
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
80 hours
Battery life
80 hours
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse has a battery life of 80 hours, which is less than 51.4% of mice and equal to 5.5% of mice.
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
Battery capacity
1,000 mAh
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 1,000 mAh, which is larger than 94% of mice and equal to 3.3% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
9
N. of buttons
9
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 9 buttons, which is more than 88.3% of mice and equal to 3.5% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
9
N. of programmable buttons
9
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, which is more than 88.6% of mice and equal to 3.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
yes
Profile switching button
yes
â–² Better than 84% of models
This mouse includes a profile switching button. 84.1% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
122 g
Weight
122 g
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 122 g, which is heavier than 89% of mice and equal to 0.1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.7 m
Cable length
1.7 m
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.7 m, which is less than 82.4% of mice and equal to 1.1% of mice.
Cable type
braided
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Onboard memory profiles
5
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Redragon Gaming Mouse Software
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Redragon M991 Wireless vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 3 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    50 DPI
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 3 more RGB zones
    RGB zones
    4
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse has 4 RGB zones, while the average mouse has 1 RGB zones.
    4 vs 1
  • Profile switch button
    Profile switching button
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This mouse includes a profile switching button, while the average mouse does not. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • 2.6x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    26,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 26000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    26,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    50 DPI
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 2x larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    1,000 mAh
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 1000 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    1,000 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 3 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 9 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • Profile switch button
    Profile switching button
    yes
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This mouse includes a profile switching button, while the average mouse does not. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
  • 3 more buttons
    N. of buttons
    9
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <4 – >9
    This mouse has 9 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    9 vs 6
  • 3 more RGB zones
    RGB zones
    4
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse has 4 RGB zones, while the average mouse has 1 RGB zones.
    4 vs 1
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 48.8% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    122 g
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 122 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    122 g vs 82 g
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This mouse uses 0.7 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.7 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 8.5 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    74.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 74.5 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    74.5 mm vs 66 mm
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 0.1 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.7 m
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.7 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.7 m vs 1.8 m
  • 2 mm longer mouse length
    Length
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <39.2 mm – >128.5 mm
    This mouse has a length of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a length of 40 mm.
    42 mm vs 40 mm
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    20 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 48.8% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    122 g
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 122 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    122 g vs 82 g
  • 8.5 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    74.5 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 74.5 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    74.5 mm vs 66 mm
  • Thin glide feet
    Feet thickness
    0.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This mouse uses 0.7 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.7 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 0.1 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.7 m
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.7 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.7 m vs 1.8 m
  • 2 mm longer mouse length
    Length
    42 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <39.2 mm – >128.5 mm
    This mouse has a length of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a length of 40 mm.
    42 mm vs 40 mm

Graphic comparison of Redragon M991 Wireless and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,932 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Redragon M991 Wireless?

  • Affordable price offering high value compared to major brands like Razer and Logitech
  • Comfortable ergonomic design suitable for palm grips and large hands
  • Accurate performance with a high-end PixArt PAW3370 (or PAW3395) sensor
  • Strong customization options including 9 programmable buttons and dedicated rapid-fire key
  • Impressive and vibrant RGB lighting with multiple adjustable modes
  • Solid build quality that is surprisingly sturdy and resistant to drops
  • Handy onboard storage for the USB wireless dongle

What customers dislike about Redragon M991 Wireless?

  • Inconsistent wireless performance with some users reporting noticeable lag or stuttering
  • Accompanying software is often described as limited or basic compared to competitors
  • Charging cable is notably stiff and can be cumbersome for wired use
  • The mouse is relatively heavy, which may not suit competitive FPS players
  • Stock mouse skates are reported to be thin and may catch on some surfaces
  • Scroll wheel lacks tactility and can feel too light or loose for some preferences
  • Side buttons may exhibit significant pre-travel or uneven actuation points

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Redragon M991 Wireless with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)