OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Attack Shark X1 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:40000 DPIWeight:53 g

Attack Shark X1 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

80%

7.6

Technical Score

20%

8.2

User score

â–²Better than 82% of mice
7.6

Technical Score

Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.7

Controls

16%

9.5

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

7.5

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 82% of mice
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 678 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 59% of mice
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
  • attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1
attack-shark-x1

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Attack Shark X1 is an ultra-lightweight, tri-mode gaming mouse featuring the flagship PixArt PAW3395PRO sensor, which delivers up to 40,000 DPI, 700 IPS tracking speed, and 60G acceleration for professional-level precision. Weighing only 53g (±3g), it utilizes Omron optical microswitches rated for 100 million clicks and a 1,000Hz polling rate for rapid 1ms response times across 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth, and USB-C wired connections. Its standout characteristics include an upgraded magnetic charging dock with an integrated RGB touchpad and a high-performance F-Switch scroll wheel encoder. Main pros include its exceptional value-to-performance ratio, extremely light full-shell design without holes, and versatile connectivity. Available cons include a build that may feel plasticky to some users, potentially mushy side buttons, and a small physical profile that may cause discomfort for users with larger hands during long sessions.

Technical Specifications of mouse Attack Shark X1

Technical Score
Technical score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components:

36%

6.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.7

Controls

16%

9.5

Design

14%

6.1

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

7.5

Battery & Charging

7.6
Attack Shark X1 has a technical score of 7.6 points, which is higher than that of 81.6% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

70%

8.7

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on 678 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.2
Attack Shark X1 has a user score of 8.17 points, which is higher than that of 59.4% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Popularity:
Attack Shark X1 has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 56.6% of products in this category.
6.9
Attack Shark X1 has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 56.6% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.4
Attack Shark X1 has a value-for-money score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 81.1% of products in this category.
Brand name
Attack
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
?
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
192 hours
Battery life
192 hours
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 192 hours on a charge, which is longer than 86.8% of mice.
Battery capacity
300 mAh
Battery capacity
300 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, which is smaller than 70.3% of mice and equal to 19.9% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
5
N. of programmable buttons
5
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, which is less than 64.5% of mice and equal to 13.4% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
53 g
Weight
53 g
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 53 g, which makes it lighter than 88.3% of mice and equal to 1.4% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.6 m
Cable length
1.6 m
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, which is less than 83.6% of mice and equal to 3.1% of mice.
Cable type
braided
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
1
Onboard memory profiles
1
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 1 onboard profiles, which is more than 48% of mice and equal to 20% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
Attack Shark Driver
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Attack Shark X1 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 70 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    100 million clicks
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 100 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    100 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 4x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    40,000 DPI
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 40000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    40,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 35.4% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    53 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 53 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    53 g vs 82 g
  • 75% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    700 IPS
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 700 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    700 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 107 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    192 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 192 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    192 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    50 DPI
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 15.1% better value for money
    Attack Shark X1 has better value for money than the average mouse (8.42 vs 7.3).
    8.42 vs 7.31
  • 4x higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    40,000 DPI
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 40000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    40,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 75% higher tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    700 IPS
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 700 IPS, while the average mouse offers a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    700 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 50% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    60 G
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 60 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    60 G vs 40 G
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    50 DPI
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 107 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    192 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 192 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    192 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Charging dock included
    Charging dock included
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This mouse includes a charging dock, while the average mouse does not. 5.4% of mice include a charging dock.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • 70 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    100 million clicks
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 100 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    100 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 35.4% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    53 g
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 53 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    53 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 4 newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2025, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    March 2025
    2025 vs 2021
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    5
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 0.2 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.6 m
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.6 m vs 1.8 m
  • 0.5 hours longer full charge time
    Full charge time
    2.5 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.5 hours – >4 hours
    This mouse reaches a full charge in 2.5 hours, while the average mouse reaches a full charge in 2 hours.
    source range 2-3 h.
    2.5 hours vs 2 hours
  • 40% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    300 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 300 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    300 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • 1 fewer programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    5
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 5 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    5 vs 6
  • 0.2 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.6 m
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.6 m vs 1.8 m

Graphic comparison of Attack Shark X1 and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 678 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Attack Shark X1?

  • Excellent value for money as a budget-tier gaming mouse
  • Extremely lightweight design, weighing approximately 53g (some variants cited as 49g)
  • Includes a convenient magnetic RGB charging dock with a touchpad to switch lighting
  • High-performance PixArt PAW3395PRO sensor providing up to 40,000 DPI
  • Long-lasting battery life reported by many users, lasting weeks for light work
  • Tri-mode connectivity supports 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth, and wired USB-C
  • Shape is highly praised, often compared to a smaller version of the Razer Viper V3 Pro

What customers dislike about Attack Shark X1?

  • Software is often described as sketchy, difficult to find, or non-functional for some users
  • Build quality can feel 'cheap' due to the plastic materials used
  • Inconsistent quality control with reports of random disconnections or jittery performance
  • The charging dock can become finicky or unreliable over time
  • Stock mouse skates (feet) are considered thin and low quality by enthusiasts
  • Included grip tape is reported to fade or lose its texture very quickly

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Attack Shark X1 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)