Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Skullcandy Titan Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Form factor:in-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Skullcandy Titan Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Skullcandy Titan
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.2

Technical score

20%

8.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 73% of headphones
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 67%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

5.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 88%
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 77%
  • skullcandy-titan
skullcandy-titan
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Skullcandy Titan

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

5.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

6.5

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.2

Calls & Controls

5.2
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

8.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.3
Popularity
Popularity
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Skullcandy Titan has a popularity score of 8.4 points, which is higher than that of 79.8% of products in this category.
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.1
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
11 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 11 mm, smaller driver size than 87.2% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Skullcandy
Form factor
in-ear
Weight
77 g
This pair of headphones weighs 77 g, lighter than 79.8% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
N/A
Show more

Skullcandy Titan vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 64.7% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (77 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    77 g vs 218 g
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • Better IP rating
    This pair of headphones has a better IP rating than the average pair of headphones (IP55 vs none). The average headphones have an IP rating of none.
    IP55 vs none
  • 2.57x cheaper
    Skullcandy Titan is cheaper than the average pair of headphones (£35 vs £90).
    £35 vs £90
  • 2.57x cheaper
    Skullcandy Titan is cheaper than the average pair of headphones (£35 vs £90).
    £35 vs £90
  • 64.7% lower weight
    This pair of headphones is lighter than the average pair of headphones (77 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    77 g vs 218 g
  • Better IP rating
    This pair of headphones has a better IP rating than the average pair of headphones (IP55 vs none). The average headphones have an IP rating of none.
    IP55 vs none
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • Direct 3.5 mm plug
    This pair of headphones includes a direct 3.5 mm plug, the average pair of headphones does not. 39.8% of headphones have a 3.5 mm male connector.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 29 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (11 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    11 mm vs 40 mm
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 8 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2008 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    December 2008
    2008 vs 2016
  • 2.9% worse value for money
    Skullcandy Titan has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.07 vs 7.3).
    7.07 vs 7.27
  • 2.9% worse value for money
    Skullcandy Titan has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.07 vs 7.3).
    7.07 vs 7.27
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • 29 mm smaller driver size
    This pair of headphones has smaller driver size than the average pair of headphones (11 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    11 mm vs 40 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 8 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2008 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    December 2008
    2008 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
UsednReviewed
≈ estimated
26/09/2012
Hands-on review · sound quality and build over several days
Verdict
Skullcandy Titan delivers superb sound and bass for the price, with slightly weak treble.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

theheadphonelist.com
05/06/2013
Personal review · Metal in-ear earphones
Verdict
The Skullcandy Titan has big bass and the best sound Skullcandy has made, but muddy bass and harsh treble with the stock tips hold it back.
theabsolutesound.com
12/12/2008
Hands-on review · Lightweight in-ear earphones
Verdict
The Skullcandy Titan is a light, well-balanced in-ear with punchy midrange detail, a bargain for its class, though the bass sits slightly forward and is a touch overripe.
H
headphoneslab.com
01/04/2020
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
13/11/2009
Summary of the review
U
ucdavistechtalk.wordpress.com
15/06/2010
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/06/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Skullcandy Titan

  • Exceptional bass response and deep, punchy sound
  • Rugged and durable build with all-metal housing
  • Comfortable, snug fit that stays in place during activities like running
  • Good value for the price, often performing better than similarly priced competitors
  • Effective passive noise isolation with properly fitted gel tips
  • Includes helpful accessories like a carrying bag and multiple sizes of ear tips
  • Stylish industrial design with multiple color options

What customers don't like about Skullcandy Titan

  • Lack of integrated in-line volume controls
  • Mid-range can feel slightly recessed and muddy compared to higher-end models
  • Treble can be harsh or lacks detail depending on the ear tips used
  • Metal housing can become uncomfortably hot if left in a car or sunlight
  • Cord lacks proper strain relief at the insertion point, raising long-term durability concerns
  • Thin cable is prone to tangling if not stored in the provided case
  • Can become uncomfortable after several hours of continuous use

Verdict

The Skullcandy Titan is a wired in-ear headphone featuring 11mm power drivers with NdFeB magnets housed in laser-cut aluminum for enhanced durability and style. It operates with a frequency response of 20Hz–20kHz, an impedance of 16 ohms, and a maximum input power of 100mW, connected via a 1.3-meter braided aluminum tangle-resistant cable with a gold-plated 3.5mm plug. Main pros include its powerful, thumping bass, high build quality due to the metal construction, and the inclusion of both silicone and Comply foam eartips for superior noise isolation and comfort. However, some users report cons such as a lack of inline volume controls on certain models, a sound signature that can be overly bass-heavy or muddy for critical listening, and potential discomfort during extended use due to the size of the metal housings.

Compare Skullcandy Titan with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Skullcandy Titan and other products in the Headphones category

No results found