OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Monster 24K Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£240Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Monster 24K Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Monster 24K
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical score

20%

7.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 65% of headphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

4.9

Design

8%

6.4

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.5

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 64%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 83%
  • monster-24k
  • monster-24k
  • monster-24k
  • monster-24k
  • monster-24k
monster-24k
monster-24k
monster-24k
monster-24k
monster-24k
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Monster 24K

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

52%

6.5

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

4.9

Design

8%

6.4

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

6.5

Calls & Controls

5.7
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Popularity:
Monster 24K has a popularity score of 4.9 points, which is lower than that of 59.5% of products in this category.
4.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

6.9
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
?
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
yes
This pair of headphones includes a boom microphone. 86.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
?
Multipoint support
?
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Monster
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
331 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 331 g, heavier than 88.6% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Monster 24K vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • LE Audio support
    This pair of headphones supports LE Audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.6% of headphones support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 4,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • Dj-focused design
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Marked yes because the product is explicitly described in the product summary as a DJ headphone, designed for DJ use, or intended for DJ monitoring.
  • Boom microphone included
    This pair of headphones includes a boom microphone, the average pair of headphones does not. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Dj-focused design
    This pair of headphones is designed for DJ use, the average pair of headphones is not. 2.9% of headphones are designed for DJ use.
    Marked yes because the product is explicitly described in the product summary as a DJ headphone, designed for DJ use, or intended for DJ monitoring.
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 4,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • LE Audio support
    This pair of headphones supports LE Audio, the average pair of headphones does not. 11.6% of headphones support Bluetooth LE Audio.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Boom microphone included
    This pair of headphones includes a boom microphone, the average pair of headphones does not. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
  • 51.8% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (331 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    331 g vs 218 g
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 12.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Monster 24K
    the average pair of headphones
    Monster 24K has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (7.13 vs 8).
    7.13 vs 8
  • 2.67x more expensive
    Monster 24K is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£240 vs £90).
    £240 vs £90
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Monster 24K has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.95 vs 7.3).
    6.95 vs 7.27
  • 5 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (98 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    98 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • 12.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Monster 24K
    the average pair of headphones
    Monster 24K has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (7.13 vs 8).
    7.13 vs 8
  • 2.67x more expensive
    Monster 24K is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£240 vs £90).
    £240 vs £90
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Monster 24K has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.95 vs 7.3).
    6.95 vs 7.27
  • 51.8% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (331 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    331 g vs 218 g
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • 5 dB SPL lower sound pressure level
    This pair of headphones has a lower sound pressure level than the average pair of headphones (98 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL). The average headphones reach a sound pressure level of 103 dB SPL.
    98 dB SPL vs 103 dB SPL
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
TheReviewArtist
✓ explicit
16/01/2016
Hands-on review · sound, fit and gold finish
Verdict
Monster 24K is highly recommended, though its large fit may not suit smaller heads.
8.0
DJBooth Pro Audio
≈ estimated
04/12/2014
Hands-on review · sound, comfort and build tests
Verdict
Monster 24K is good for DJs and everyday listening, though its plastic build may crack over time.
9.0
TheGamingAudiophile
≈ estimated
17/10/2014
Hands-on review · sound tests, EQ tuning and comparisons
Verdict
Monster 24K is a stylish, bass-heavy DJ-style headphone that works well with electronic music once the EQ is adjusted.
9.0
Gear Diary
≈ estimated
02/07/2014
Hands-on review · sound, comfort and build tests
Verdict
Monster 24K sounds good and feels comfortable, though the gold paint and basic pouch are weak points.
7.0
Flossy Carter
≈ estimated
31/10/2015
First look · unboxing and style impressions
Verdict
Monster 24K is stylish and eye-catching for buyers who want looks, though it is not the strongest on sound.
7.0
Jacques Slade
≈ estimated
18/10/2015
Quick first listen · unboxing and sound check
Verdict
Monster 24K has clear highs and slightly muffled bass, a good fit for listeners who dislike heavy bass.
Overview video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

cnet.com
16/01/2015
Hands-on review · DJ-style headphones
Verdict
The Monster 24K is a loud, flashy pair with deep bass and swiveling earcups that suits DJs and fashion-minded listeners, though the fit can feel tight.
geardiary.com
03/07/2014
Daily-use review · Gold statement headphones
Verdict
The Monster 24K is a comfortable, bold-looking pair with rich sound and good noise blocking, though its carry bag is thin and MusicShare is missing.
gstylemag.com
19/11/2014
Daily-use review · Gold statement headphones
Verdict
The Monster 24K is a fun, flashy pair with balanced sound and comfortable padding, best for everyday listening, though critical audiophiles will probably find it too bass-heavy.
jetmag.com
26/11/2014
Hands-on test · Gold DJ headphones
Verdict
The Monster 24K suits style-minded listeners who want gold styling and a full sound, but it can get loud enough to annoy people nearby.
A
advicesisters.com
13/11/2015
Summary of the review
Monster 24K over the ear headphones have great sound
ecoustics.com
13/03/2015
Hands-on review · Fashion over-ear
Verdict
The Monster 24K is a flashy over-ear pair whose tight bass suits pop and rap, though rivals at the same price sound better.
K
kopfhoerer.de
16/01/2017
Summary of the review
Monster N-Pulse 24k review on kopfhoerer.de
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Monster 24K

  • Aggressive, high-energy sound profile with deep, powerful bass
  • Flashy and unique 24K-style gold aesthetic suitable for fashion-conscious users
  • Functional DJ design featuring swivelling ear cups for single-ear monitoring
  • High volume output capable of being driven easily by smartphones without an external amp
  • Comfortable fit for most due to giant plush ear pads and well-padded headband
  • Durable, rugged construction that can withstand professional DJ use

What customers don't like about Monster 24K

  • High price point compared to other headphones with similar performance
  • Clamping force may feel too tight for users with larger head sizes
  • Included cloth carrying bag is flimsy and offers minimal protection
  • Gold finish is painted plastic, not actual plating, and is prone to chipping or scratching
  • Bold and 'blingy' design may be too gaudy or attention-grabbing for casual users
  • Passive noise isolation may lead to significant sound leakage at higher volumes

Verdict

The Monster 24K is a professional-grade, over-ear DJ headphone featuring a flashy 24K gold-painted finish and iconic swiveling earcups for single-ear monitoring. These wired, closed-back headphones are hand-tuned to deliver 'Pure Monster Sound' characterized by tight, deep bass and clear high-end frequencies across a range of 13 Hz to 28,000 Hz, with a 38 Ohm impedance and 98 dB sensitivity. Main pros include its durable, surprisingly lightweight plastic construction, plush memory foam cushions for extended comfort, and the inclusion of both a pro-style coiled cable and a ControlTalk Universal cable with an inline microphone for mobile use. Notable cons include its high original price point, potential for sound leakage at extreme volumes, and a clamping force that some users may find too tight for long sessions.

Compare Monster 24K with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Monster 24K and other products in the Headphones category

No results found